Are there radiographic, metabolic, and prognostic differences between cavitary and noncavitary nonsmall cell lung carcinoma? A retrospective fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography study.

AIMS: The prognosis of nonsmall cell lung cancer with cavitation (NSCLC-c) is not well-known. We compared the positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings and survival data of patients with NSCLC-c patients with those without cavitation (NSCLC-nc). METHODS: Between 7/2004 and 6/2007, cavitary lung lesions were identified in 46/248 patients undergoing fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT for lung nodule characterization or lung cancer staging. Within the same period, 40 of 202 patients with NSCLC-nc were randomly selected for comparison. The primary was assessed by location, size, cell type, and standardized uptake value (SUV). Disease stage was determined according to American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines for lung cancer. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and Cox regression to assess the effect of clinical and imaging variables on survival. RESULTS: NSCLC-c was found in 87% of patients that had a cavitary lung lesion at PET/CT. Squamous cell carcinoma, primary size and primary-to-liver SUV ratio differed significantly between NSCLC-c and NSCLC-nc, whereas age, gender, primary location, primary SUV, type of treatment, and disease stage did not. Median survival and overall 5-year survival were 19 months and 24% for NSCLC-c, and 31 months and 31% for NSCLC-nc, P = 0.23. Disease stage was the only predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: Cavitary lung lesions in patients undergoing FDG PET/CT harbor a significant risk for cancer. NSCLC-c is associated with squamous cell carcinoma, larger size, and greater FDG metabolism compared with NSCLC-nc, although these variables may not be predictive of survival. Nonetheless, PET/CT contributes to accurate staging and has an indirect impact on prognosis.

18F-FDG PET/CT of patients with cancer: comparison of whole-body and limited whole-body technique.

OBJECTIVE: Use of the routine field of view for whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT can lead to underestimation of the true extent of the disease because metastasis outside the typical base of skull to upper thigh field of view can be missed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incremental added value of true whole-body as opposed to this limited whole-body PET/CT of cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: True whole-body FDG PET/CT, from the top of the skull to the bottom of the feet, was performed on 500 consecutively registered patients. A log was kept of cases of suspected malignancy outside the typical limited whole-body field of view. Suspected lesions in the brain, skull, and extremities were verified by correlation with surgical pathologic or clinical follow-up findings. RESULTS: Fifty-nine of 500 patients had PET/CT findings suggestive of malignancy outside the limited whole-body field of view. Thirty-one of those patients had known or suspected malignancy outside the limited whole-body field of view at the time of the true whole-body study. Among the other 28 patients, follow-up data were not available for two, six had false-positive findings, and new cancerous involvement was confirmed in 20. Detection of malignancy outside the limited whole-body field of view resulted in a change in management in 65% and in staging in 55% of the 20 cases. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that 20 of 500 (4.0%) of patients had previously unsuspected malignancy outside the typical limited whole-body field of view. Detection of such malignancy resulted in a change in management in 13 of 500 cases (2.6%). We propose that adopting a true whole-body field of view in the imaging of cancer patients may lead to more accurate staging and restaging than achieved with the routinely used limited whole-body field of view.

Randomized phase II study of bortezomib alone and bortezomib in combination with docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib +/- docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 (arm A) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (arm B). A treatment cycle of 21 days comprised four bortezomib doses on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus, in arm B, docetaxel on day 1. Patients could receive unlimited cycles. The primary end point was response rate. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were treated, 75 in arm A and 80 in arm B. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Investigator-assessed response rates were 8% in arm A and 9% in arm B. Disease control rates were 29% in arm A and 54% in arm B. Median time to progression was 1.5 months in arm A and 4.0 months in arm B. One-year survival was 39% and 33%, and median survival was 7.4 and 7.8 months in arms A and B, respectively. Adverse effect profiles were as expected in both arms, with no significant additivity. The most common grade > or = 3 adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, and dyspnea (4% and 53%, 19% and 26%, and 17% and 14% of patients in arms A and B, respectively). CONCLUSION: Bortezomib has modest single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced NSCLC using this schedule, with minor enhancement in combination with docetaxel. Additional investigation of bortezomib in NSCLC is warranted in combination with other drugs known to be active, or using different schedules.

Cutaneous metastatic lung cancer detected with 18F-FDG PET.

A 48-year-old male smoker presented with a chief complaint of persistent cough for three months. A CT scan revealed only a large right paratracheal mass. The plan was to obtain histological confirmation of suspected lung cancer via bronchoscopy and mediastinoscopy. A whole body 18F-FDG (2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose) PET Scan was ordered for staging and localization of the most accessible biopsy site. There was a large, intense hypermetabolic focus corresponding to the paratracheal lesion seen on CT, as well as a lesion in the right adrenal gland. There was also a superficial, subcutaneous hypermetabolic lesion in the mid-back. The subcutaneous lesion, which previously had not been noted, was biopsied and proved to be metastatic adenocarcinoma consistent with the lung primary. This case illustrates the clinical utility of reporting soft tissue abnormalities, which may provide an alternative, more readily accessible location for biopsy that is both safer and less expensive than bronchoscopy or mediastinoscopy.