Comparative Study of Clevidipine to Nicardipine for Perioperative Hypertension in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of clevidipine to nicardipine in the treatment of perioperative acute hypertension in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study which included patients who received either clevidipine or nicardipine. Patients were followed for the duration of study drug infusion or for a maximum of 48 hours. Outcomes assessed included the percent of time spent within patient specific goal blood pressure, incidence of hypertensive events per patient, safety outcomes, and cost of medication treatment. Results: There were 201 cardiac surgeries performed between August 2018-January 2019 and July 2019-February 2020. Sixty-seven patients met our inclusion criteria of receiving either clevidipine (n = 29) or nicardipine (n = 38). The median percent of time spent within goal blood pressure range for clevidipine was 55.2% compared to 36.4% for nicardipine treatment (P = .036). The median number of hypertensive episodes per patient was 3 for clevidipine and 2 for nicardipine (P = .211). There were no identified differences in safety outcomes such as hypotension, vasopressor use, serum creatinine elevation, tachycardia, and atrial fibrillation. The median cost of treatment required for the observed 48-hour period with clevidipine was $128.58 compared to $55.74 for nicardipine (P < .001). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that patients undergoing cardiac surgery on clevidipine had better perioperative blood pressure control compared to nicardipine, with a negligible increase in cost, and no observed difference in safety.

A single dose of pre-operative pregabalin reduces post-operative opioid use after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Multimodal pain management strategies including pregabalin (PGB) have been shown to reduce pain and opioid use after many types of surgeries. This was a single-center, retrospective study aimed to determine whether a single pre-operative dose of PGB reduces opioid requirements and post-operative pain after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Outcomes included the mean morphine milligram equivalents used; the proportion of patients with no pain documented; and the maximum level of pain documented within the first 24h and in the 24-72h following OLT. A total of 44 patients received PGB vs 57 who received standard of care. Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. Patients who received PGB required 70% and 54% less opioids within the first 24h and subsequent 24-72h post-OLT, respectively (p-values < .001). In the first 24h post-OLT, there were more patients with no documented pain, and fewer with severe pain in the PGB group, but these were not significant. A greater proportion in the PGB group reported a maximum of mild pain (p = .039). This study demonstrated that a single dose of pre-operative PGB significantly reduced opioid use in the first 72 h after OLT. Larger studies will help determine the safety and efficacy of PGB in this setting.

Potential Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Management of Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare, potentially life-threatening condition secondary to unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin exposure. This immune-mediated drug reaction manifests as thrombocytopenia with a paradoxical hypercoagulable state that can result in life-threatening thrombosis. It is imperative to ensure cessation of heparin-based products as soon as HIT is identified. Traditional treatment options include argatroban, bivalirudin, fondaparinux, and danaparoid with a transition to warfarin upon platelet recovery. These anticoagulants are notwithstanding limitations including parenteral administration and routine laboratory monitoring leading to prolonged hospitalizations, emphasizing the need for new therapies. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly investigated for the management of HIT and may overcome the aforementioned challenges of current therapies. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the current HIT guidelines, discuss limitations to contemporary treatment options, provide insight into the emerging evidence for the DOACs rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, and conclude with a clinical summary for their use in this setting. The PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases were searched for peer-reviewed literature from January 1, 2012, to June 31, 2018. Twenty-seven articles met inclusion criteria for review: 1 prospective trial, 5 retrospective cohort studies, and 21 case reports totaling 104 patients treated with a DOAC for HIT. The DOACs prevented new and recurrent thrombosis in 98% (n=102) of cases, and bleeding complications occurred in 3% (n=3). While current literature remains limited, it is suggestive of a potential role of DOACs for HIT, which has led to their integration into the 2018 American Society Hematology Guidelines with a conditional recommendation.

Assessment of Prescribing and Monitoring Habits for Patients Taking an Antiarrhythmic and Concomitant QTc-Prolonging Antibiotic.

Patients may intermittently require antimicrobial therapy with a QTc-prolonging antibiotic, which presents a challenge for prescribers of patients already taking a QTc-prolonging antiarrhythmic. Manufacturers recommend close monitoring for evidence of QTc-prolongation with the concomitant use of QTc-prolonging medications, but the monitoring parameters are not well-defined. Previous studies recommend a surveillance electrocardiogram (EKG) be completed both before and after the initiation of QTc-prolonging medications, but it is unknown to what degree EKGs displaying the QTc-interval are used to alter physician order entry and pharmacist order verification during concomitant therapy. A retrospective chart review was conducted between October 2015-September 2016 to assess prescribing and monitoring habits for patients taking an antiarrhythmic and a concomitant QTc-prolonging antibiotic. Of the 42 patients who received at least one dose of two QTc-prolonging agents, 36 (85.7%) received a baseline EKG, and 23 (63.8%) received a follow-up EKG. Pharmacists intervened on this drug-drug interaction and recommended follow-up EKGs only three times (8.3%) and offered alternative therapy recommendations once (2.8%). The QTc-interval was not optimally monitored in some instances for patients concomitantly receiving two QTc-prolonging agents. These results stress the importance of inter-professional communication to place an emphasis on follow-up monitoring or use of alternative therapy agents to avoid the drug-drug interaction altogether.

Pharmacologic management of angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

PURPOSE: The published evidence on pharmacologic approaches to the management of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)-induced angioedema is reviewed. SUMMARY: Angioedema is a serious, potentially life-threatening adverse effect of ACEI use. Although the underlying mechanism is not fully understood, excess bradykinin produced through a complex interplay between the kallikrein-kinin and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems is thought to play a major role. The nonallergic nature of the reaction renders traditional therapies (corticosteroids and antihistamines) ineffective because those agents do not modify the proposed pathophysiology. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) provides kinase II, a protein that breaks down bradykinin. Case reports support FFP as a treatment for ACEI-induced angioedema, but no formal evaluations have been completed to date. Both ecallantide and complement 1 esterase (C1) inhibitor concentrate reduce bradykinin production through upstream inhibition of kallikrein. C1 inhibitor concentrate has been used successfully to manage ACEI-induced angioedema in a few reported cases, but robust supportive studies are lacking. Conversely, ecallantide has been evaluated in multiple randomized trials but has not been shown to offer advantages over traditional therapies. The use of icatibant, a direct antagonist of bradykinin B2 receptors, was reported to be beneficial in several case reports and in a small Phase II study, safely and rapidly reducing symptoms of ACEI-induced angioedema. An ongoing Phase III trial (NCT01919801) will better define the role of icatibant in the management of ACEI-induced angioedema. CONCLUSION: FFP, C1 inhibitor, and icatibant appear to be safe and effective therapeutic options for the management of ACEI-induced angioedema, whereas it appears ecallantide should be avoided.

Impact of nursing education by a pharmacist on sedation practice in a trauma surgical intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION: Benefits of pharmacist-provided education on nurse-driven sedation protocols have not been assessed. METHODS: Trauma intensive care unit nurses received pharmacist-provided education on the hospital's sedation protocol. Sedation outcomes were assessed for patients in the preeducation (n = 29) and posteducation (n = 33) groups. RESULTS: The primary outcome of sedation scores at goal was not significantly different (41% vs 60%; P = .169), while more patients experienced oversedation (50% vs 32%; P = .013) in the pre- vs posteducation groups, respectively. No patient experienced self-extubation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar achievement of goal sedation scores before and after pharmacist-provided education, the posteducation group experienced fewer incidences of oversedation with no difference in self-extubation.

Role of corticosteroids during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Corticosteroids are commonly used in the peri-operative setting for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The inflammatory response to CPB is associated with organ dysfunction and increased mortality. Corticosteroids reduce biochemical inflammatory markers associated with CPB, however the impact on clinical outcomes is mixed. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the evidence of changes in clinical outcomes associated with the peri-operative administration of corticosteroids in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses were reviewed for evidence evaluating the impact of corticosteroids on clinical outcomes including mortality, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation (AF), duration of intubation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital stay, hyperglycemia, and gastrointestinal complications. Most of the relevant studies are underpowered to assess major clinical outcomes. Although corticosteroids likely reduce the risk of AF, this needs to be evaluated when used in addition to or in lieu of other anti-arrhythmic agents. Evidence does not equivocally support the use of corticosteroids to improve clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery patients.