Sex differences and correlates of poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Brazil and Venezuela.

OBJECTIVE: Examine whether glycaemic control varies according to sex and whether the latter plays a role in modifying factors associated with inadequate glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Brazil and Venezuela. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cross-sectional, nationwide survey conducted in Brazil and Venezuela from February 2006 to June 2007 to obtain information about glycaemic control and its determinants in patients with diabetes mellitus attending outpatient clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was measured by liquid chromatography, and patients with HbA1c ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol) were considered to have inadequate glycaemic control. The association of selected variables with glycaemic control was analysed by multivariate linear regression, using HbA1c as the dependent variable. RESULTS: A total of 9418 patients with T2D were enrolled in Brazil (n=5692) and in Venezuela (n=3726). They included 6214 (66%) women and 3204 (34%) men. On average, HbA1c levels in women were 0.13 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.24; p=0.015) higher than in men, after adjusting for age, marital status, education, race, country, body mass index, duration of disease, complications, type of healthcare, adherence to diet, adherence to treatment and previous measurement of HbA1c. Sex modified the effect of some factors associated with glycaemic control in patients with T2D in our study, but had no noteworthy effect in others. CONCLUSIONS: Women with T2D had worse glycaemic control than men. Possible causes for poorer glycaemic control in women compared with men include differences in glucose homeostasis, treatment response and psychological factors. In addition, sex modified factors associated with glycaemic control, suggesting the need to develop specific treatment guidelines for men and women.

Performance of a bedside C-reactive protein test in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in adults with acute cough.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a rapid, bedside whole blood C-reactive protein test as a diagnostic test for pneumonia in adults. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive adults who presented with acute cough (duration < or =3 weeks). A fingerstick blood specimen for C-reactive protein level was obtained. Patients also provided information about demographic characteristics and symptoms. Physical examination findings, diagnoses, and treatments were abstracted from the medical record; illness duration and subsequent office visits were determined with follow-up telephone calls. A clinical prediction rule for pneumonia was calculated for each patient and compared with C-reactive protein levels. RESULTS: Twenty (12%) of the 168 patients in the study had radiographic evidence of pneumonia. Median C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher for patients with pneumonia than in the remaining patients (60 mg/L vs. 9 mg/L, P <0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for C-reactive protein level as a predictor of pneumonia was 0.83. C-reactive protein level and the clinical prediction rule were independently associated with pneumonia, yielding a combined area under the ROC curve of 0.93. C-reactive protein level was not associated with hospitalization or resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSION: C-reactive protein levels could be a valuable addition to clinical prediction rules for pneumonia. A C-reactive protein level > or =100 mg/L might be a useful indication for chest radiography or empiric antibiotic therapy when the diagnosis of pneumonia is in doubt.