Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
High Alt Med Biol ; 2024 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634740

ABSTRACT

Grimm, Mirjam, Lucie Ziegler, Annina Seglias, Maamed Mademilov, Kamila Magdieva, Gulzada Mirzalieva, Aijan Taalaibekova, Simone Suter, Simon R. Schneider, Fiona Zoller, Vera Bissig, Lukas Reinhard, Meret Bauer, Julian Müller, Tanja L. Ulrich, Arcangelo F. Carta, Patrick R. Bader, Konstantinos Bitos, Aurelia E. Reiser, Benoit Champigneulle, Damira Ashyralieva, Philipp M. Scheiwiller, Silvia Ulrich, Talant M. Sooronbaev, Michael Furian, and Konrad E. Bloch. SARS-CoV-2 Transmission during High-Altitude Field Studies. High Alt Med Biol. 00:00-00, 2024. Background: Throughout the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, virus transmission during clinical research was of concern. Therefore, during high-altitude field studies performed in 2021, we took specific COVID-19 precautions and investigated the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: From May to September 2021, we performed studies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in healthy school-age children in Kyrgyzstan in high-altitude facilities at 3,100 m and 3,250 m and at 760 m. The various implemented COVID-19 safety measures included systematic SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing (RAT). Main outcomes were SARS-CoV-2-RAT-positive rate among participants and staff at initial presentation (prevalence) and SARS-CoV-2-RAT-positive conversion during and within 10 days after studies (incidence). Results: Among 338 participants and staff, SARS-CoV-2-RAT-positive prevalence was 15 (4.4%). During mean ± SD duration of individual study participation of 3.1 ± 1.0 day and within 10 days, RAT-positive conversion occurred in 1/237(0.4%) participants. Among staff working in studies for 31.5 ± 29.3 days, SARS-CoV-2-RAT-positive conversion was 11/101(10.9%). In all 338 individuals involved in the studies over the course of 15.6 weeks, the median SARS-CoV-2-RAT-positive incidence was 0.00%/week (quartiles 0.00; 0.64). Over the same period, the median background incidence among the total Kyrgyz population of 6,636 million was 0.06%/week (0.03; 0.11), p = 0.013 (Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusions: Taking precautions by implementing specific safety measures, SARS-CoV-2 transmission during clinical studies was very rare, and the SARS-CoV-2 incidence among participants and staff was lower than that in the general population during the same period. The results are reassuring and may help in decision-making on the conduct of clinical research in similar settings.

2.
J Clin Med ; 12(3)2023 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36769447

ABSTRACT

Investigation of pulmonary gas exchange efficacy usually requires arterial blood gas analysis (aBGA) to determine arterial partial pressure of oxygen (mPaO2) and compute the Riley alveolar-to-arterial oxygen difference (A-aDO2); that is a demanding and invasive procedure. A noninvasive approach (AGM100), allowing the calculation of PaO2 (cPaO2) derived from pulse oximetry (SpO2), has been developed, but this has not been validated in a large cohort of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Our aim was to conduct a validation study of the AG100 in hypoxemic moderate-to-severe COPD. Concurrent measurements of cPaO2 (AGM100) and mPaO2 (EPOC, portable aBGA device) were performed in 131 moderate-to-severe COPD patients (mean ±SD FEV1: 60 ± 10% of predicted value) and low-altitude residents, becoming hypoxemic (i.e., SpO2 < 94%) during a short stay at 3100 m (Too-Ashu, Kyrgyzstan). Agreements between cPaO2 (AGM100) and mPaO2 (EPOC) and between the O2-deficit (calculated as the difference between end-tidal pressure of O2 and cPaO2 by the AGM100) and Riley A-aDO2 were assessed. Mean bias (±SD) between cPaO2 and mPaO2 was 2.0 ± 4.6 mmHg (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.2 to 2.8 mmHg) with 95% limits of agreement (LoA): -7.1 to 11.1 mmHg. In multivariable analysis, larger body mass index (p = 0.046), an increase in SpO2 (p < 0.001), and an increase in PaCO2-PETCO2 difference (p < 0.001) were associated with imprecision (i.e., the discrepancy between cPaO2 and mPaO2). The positive predictive value of cPaO2 to detect severe hypoxemia (i.e., PaO2 ≤ 55 mmHg) was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87 to 0.98) with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.77 (95% CI: 1.71 to 8.33). The mean bias between O2-deficit and A-aDO2 was 6.2 ± 5.5 mmHg (95% CI: 5.3 to 7.2 mmHg; 95%LoA: -4.5 to 17.0 mmHg). AGM100 provided an accurate estimate of PaO2 in hypoxemic patients with COPD, but the precision for individual values was modest. This device is promising for noninvasive assessment of pulmonary gas exchange efficacy in COPD patients.

3.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 16: 3503-3512, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34992358

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are particularly vulnerable to hypoxia-induced autonomic dysregulation. Hypoxemia is marked during sleep. In COPD, altitude exposure is associated with an increase in blood pressure (BP) and a decrease in baroreflex-sensitivity (BRS). Whether nocturnal oxygen therapy (NOT) may mitigate these cardiovascular autonomic changes in COPD at altitude is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial, 32 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD living <800 m were subsequently allocated to NOT and placebo during acute exposure to altitude. Measurements were done at low altitude at 490 m and during two stays at 2048 m on NOT (3 L/min) and placebo (3 L/min, ambient air) via nasal cannula. Allocation and intervention sequences were randomized. Outcomes of interest were BP, BRS (from beat-to-beat BP measurement), BP variability (BPV), and heart rate. RESULTS: About 23/32 patients finished the trial per protocol (mean (SD) age 66 (5) y, FEV1 62 (14) % predicted) and 9/32 experienced altitude-related illnesses (8 vs 1, p < 0.05 placebo vs NOT). NOT significantly mitigated the altitude-induced increase in systolic BP compared to placebo (Δ median -5.8 [95% CI -22.2 to -1.4] mmHg, p = 0.05) but not diastolic BP (-3.5 [95% CI -12.6 to 3.0] mmHg; p = 0.21) or BPV. BRS at altitude was significantly higher in NOT than in placebo (1.7 [95% CI 0.3 to 3.4] ms/mmHg, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: NOT may protect from hypoxia-induced autonomic dysregulation upon altitude exposure in COPD and thus protect from a relevant increase in BP and decrease in BRS. NOT may provide cardiovascular benefits in COPD during conditions of increased hypoxemia and may be considered in COPD travelling to altitude.


Subject(s)
Altitude , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Aged , Blood Pressure , Cross-Over Studies , Humans , Hypoxia/diagnosis , Hypoxia/therapy , Oxygen , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...