Gastrointestinal failure score in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: There are no universally accepted diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal failure in critically ill patients. In the present study we tested whether the occurrence of food intolerance (FI) and intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), combined in a 5-grade scoring system for assessment of gastrointestinal function (the Gastrointestinal Failure [GIF] score), predicts mortality. The prognostic value of the GIF score alone and in combination with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is evaluated, and the incidence and outcome of gastrointestinal failure is described relative to the GIF score. METHODS: A total of 264 subsequently hospitalized patients, who were mechanically ventilated on admission and stayed in the intensive care unit (ICU) for longer than 24 hours, were prospectively studied. GIF score was documented daily as follows: 0 = normal gastrointestinal function; 1 = enteral feeding with under 50% of calculated needs or no feeding 3 days after abdominal surgery; 2 = FI or IAH; 3 = FI and IAH; and 4 = abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Admission parameters and mean GIF and SOFA scores for the first 3 days were used to predict ICU outcome. RESULTS: FI developed in 58.3%, IAH in 27.3%, and both together in 22.7% of patients. The mean GIF score for the first 3 days in the ICU was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality (odds ratio = 3.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.63 to 5.59; P < 0.001). The GIF score integrated into the SOFA score allowed better prediction of ICU mortality than did the SOFA score alone, and was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.28 to 1.74; P < 0.001). The development of gastrointestinal failure (FI plus IAH) was associated with significantly higher ICU and 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: The GIF score is useful for classifying information on the gastrointestinal system. The mean GIF score during the first 3 days in the ICU had high prognostic value for ICU mortality. Development of gastrointestinal failure is associated with significantly impaired outcome.

Primary and secondary intra-abdominal hypertension--different impact on ICU outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in incidence, time course and outcome of primary versus secondary intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), and to evaluate IAH as an independent risk factor of mortality in a presumable risk population of critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: General intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 257 mechanically ventilated patients at presumable risk for the development of IAH were studied during their ICU stay and followed up for 90-day survival. INTERVENTIONS: Repeated measurements of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: IAP was measured intermittently, via bladder. IAH (sustained or repeated IAP > or = 12 mmHg) developed in 95 patients (37.0%). Primary IAH was observed in 60 and secondary IAH in 35 patients. Patients with secondary IAH demonstrated a significant increase of mean IAP during the first three days (mean DeltaIAP was 2.2 +/- 4.7 mmHg), whilst IAP decreased (mean DeltaIAP -1.1 +/- 3.7 mmHg) in the patients with primary IAH. The patients with IAH had a significantly higher ICU- (37.9 vs. 19.1%; P = 0.001), 28-day (48.4 vs. 27.8%, P = 0.001), and 90-day mortality (53.7 vs. 35.8%, P = 0.004) compared to the patients without the syndrome. Patients with secondary IAH had a significantly higher ICU mortality than patients with primary IAH (P = 0.032). Development of IAH was identified as an independent risk factor for death (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.23-5.14). CONCLUSIONS: Secondary IAH is less frequent, has a different time course and worse outcome than primary IAH. Development of IAH during ICU period is an independent risk factor for death.

Gastrointestinal failure in intensive care: a retrospective clinical study in three different intensive care units in Germany and Estonia.

BACKGROUND: While gastrointestinal problems are common in ICU patients with multiple organ failure, gastrointestinal failure has not been given the consideration other organ systems receive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of gastrointestinal failure (GIF), to identify its risk factors, and to determine its association with ICU mortality. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of adult patients (n = 2588) admitted to three different ICUs (two ICUs at the university hospital Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany and one at Tartu University Clinics, Estonia) during the year 2002 was performed. Data recorded in a computerized database were used in Berlin. In Tartu, the data documented in the patients' charts was retrospectively transferred into a similar database. GIF was defined as documented gastrointestinal problems (food intolerance, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and/or ileus) in the patient data at any period of their ICU stay. ICU mortality, length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation were assessed as outcome parameters. RESULTS: GIF was identified in 252 patients (9.7% of all patients). Only 20% of GIF patients were identifiable at admission. GIF was related to significantly higher mortality (43.7% vs. 5.3% in patients without GIF), as well as prolonged length of ICU stay (10 vs. 2 days) and mechanical ventilation (8 vs. 1 day), p < 0.001, respectively. Patients' profile (emergency surgical or medical), APACHE II and SOFA scores and the use of catecholamines at admission were identified as independent risk factors for the development of GIF. Development of GIF during ICU stay was an independent predictor for death. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal failure represents a relevant clinical problem accompanied by an increased mortality, longer ICU stay and mechanical ventilation.