Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 46
Filter
1.
J Adhes Dent ; 24(1): 355-366, 2022 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36169267

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the kinetics of polymerization and shrinkage stress of resin cements, as well as their bond strength to dentin after 24-h or one-year water storage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three conventional resin cements were evaluated: RelyX Ultimate (RUL), Panavia V5 (PNV), and Multilink N (MLN); and three self-adhesive resin cements: RelyX Unicem 2 (RUN), Panavia SA Cement Plus (PSA), and G-CEM LinkAce (GCL). Degree of conversion (DC), maximum polymerization rate (RPmax) and gel time values were obtained using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR/ATR). Shrinkage stress values were determined with a tensiometer, using a universal testing machine (n=5). Indirect resin composite restorations (Solidex) were fabricated and cemented to the dentin surface using self-adhesive resin cements, or conventional resin cements with self-etching adhesive (n=5). Bonding performance was evaluated with the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test after 24 h or one year of water storage. RESULTS: MLN exhibited a higher DC (76.7%), whereas the percentage of other materials differed slightly (ranging from 54% to 58.5%). The RPmax and shrinkage stress values differed significantly between the cements. PSA showed the longest gel time. Significantly higher µTBS were observed for conventional resin cements after 24-h and one-year storage; a decrease in µTBS was observed for MLN only. CONCLUSION: Self-adhesive resin cements may not perform as well as conventional resin cements. Although both categories of cements presented similar polymerization kinetics and shrinkage values, the self-adhesive resin cements showed lower µTBS compared to those of conventional resin cements. Nevertheless, storage time only affected the bonding performance of MLN.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Resin Cements , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis , Dentin , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Materials Testing , Polymerization , Resin Cements/chemistry , Tensile Strength , Water/chemistry
2.
J Clin Exp Dent ; 14(6): e492-e498, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35765356

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of dental headlights is a common practice to better illuminate the operatory field and achieve excellence in restorative dentistry. However, visible light-cured dental materials can have reduced working time under headlight illumination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the spectral irradiance power of two dental headlights on the degree of polymerization and working time of light-curable dental composites. Material and Methods: Two headlights, StarLight Nano 3 (StarMed) (SN) and Zeon Endevour XL (Orascoptic) (ZE) were characterized using a spectrophotometer coupled to an integrating sphere (MARC® Light Collector, BlueLight Analytics). The degree of conversion of the two composites, Filtek Supreme (3M) and Tetric Prime (Ivoclar Vivadent), was evaluated using an FTIR spectroscope (NicoletTM iS20, Thermo Fisher). Results: Both headlights emitted a significant amount of blue light. The Zeon headlamp without filter emitted a broader spectrum with lower blue intensity and higher CRI than the White LED of the Nano 3. The Zeon headlamp with the blue blocking filter emitted a broader spectrum than the Orange LED of the Nano 3. There were no differences in the degree of conversion and working time of the Filtek Supreme and Tetric Prime composites when illuminated by the different headlamps. Both Zeon and the White LED of the Nano 3 were capable to cure the composites within only 5-10 minutes of irradiation. There were no changes in the degree of conversion of the composites when the Orange LED of the Nano 3 or the blue blocking filter of the Zeon were used. Conclusions: Both headlights reduced the working time of light-cured materials. The use of orange filters prevented the composite polymerization and maintained the working time. Key words:Surgical Headlight, degree of conversion, working time, light-curing.

3.
Microsc Res Tech ; 85(8): 2943-2952, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35557015

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effects of Erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser settings and dentin bonding agents on ultramorphological characteristics of resin-laser-irradiated dentin interfaces and dentin bond strength (BS) of these adhesive systems. Additionally, dentin depth affected by Er:YAG laser irradiations was measured. The experiments were performed on occlusal dentin surfaces of third molars that were flattened with 600-grit SiC sandpaper. Treated-dentin with laser settings (250 mJ/4 Hz and 160 mJ/10 Hz) were the experimental groups, while SiC abraded dentin was the control. These three dentin treatments and three adhesives (two self-etchings and one etch-&-rinse adhesive) formed nine groups for the ultramorphology of laser-ablated dentin-adhesives interfacial analysis, using a transmission electron microscope (TEM). For BS (n = 8), the same nine groups were tested with addition of the two evaluation times (24 h after sample preparation or 1 year). The depths of Er:YAG laser effects into the dentin were measured using a TEM (n = 10). Ablated-dentin depth and BS data were analyzed by one- and three-way ANOVA, respectively, and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Hybrid layer formation was only observed for controls, while for laser-treated dentin, adhesives were bonded to dentin with resin tags formation. Laser settings reduced the BS for all adhesives at 24 h, while at 1 year, etch-&-rinse adhesive presented the highest BS, regardless treatment (control or laser settings). Dentin depth affected by laser settings was similar. The laser irradiation altered the bonding mechanism of the adhesives to dentin and reduced the BS for self-etching adhesives. Etch-&-rinse adhesive yielded the highest BS at 1 year. Laser settings similarly affected the dentin in depth. HIGHLIGHTS: Er:YAG laser irradiation settings produced similar effects on depth and bond strength to dentin. The etch-&-rinse adhesive yielded the highest dentin bond strength regardless of the type of dentin treatment at 1 year.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Lasers, Solid-State , Adhesives/analysis , Dentin/chemistry , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Erbium , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Resin Cements/chemistry , Tensile Strength
4.
J Adhes Dent ; 21(3): 281-286, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31165107

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the bond strength to dentin produced by experimental adhesives formulated with an elastomeric methacrylate monomer (EMM) and an alternative initiator system based on a Thioxanthone derivative (QTX). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self-etching primer was used. For the bonding resin, a model adhesive (G1) was formulated containing bis-GMA/TEG-DMA/HEMA (co-monomeric blend) + CQ/EDAB (initiator system). The other groups were formulated by adding to this formulation: EMM only (G2), QTX (G3), or EMM and QTX (G4). Clearfil SE Bond was used as the commercial control group. Fifty bovine teeth (n = 5) were restored with each one of the five adhesives. After restorative procedures, half of the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h. The other half was fixed on a metal stub and subjected to 200,000 mechanical (50 N loading at 2 Hz frequency) and 1000 thermal cycles (5°C and 55°C). Afterwards, specimens were serially sectioned into beams and tested in tension until fracture. Bond strengths were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 5%). RESULTS: After 24 h, significantly higher µTBS was observed for the formulation containing EMM and QTX (G4) when compared to Clearfil SE Bond (p < 0.05). No significant differences in µTBS were detected among the experimental groups after 24 h (p>0.05). After thermomechanical cycling, no significant differences were observed among groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of EMM and QTX can be considered as possible alternative in dental adhesive formulations.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Animals , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate , Cattle , Composite Resins , Dental Cements , Dentin , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Materials Testing , Methacrylates , Resin Cements , Tensile Strength
5.
Braz Oral Res ; 31(suppl 1): e59, 2017 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28902239

ABSTRACT

This systematic review assessed the literature to evaluate the efficiency of polymerization of bulk-fill composite resins at 4 mm restoration depth. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched with no restrictions on year, publication status, or article's language. Selection criteria included studies that evaluated bulk-fill composite resin when inserted in a minimum thickness of 4 mm, followed by curing according to the manufacturers' instructions; presented sound statistical data; and comparison with a control group and/or a reference measurement of quality of polymerization. The evidence level was evaluated by qualitative scoring system and classified as high-, moderate- and low- evidence level. A total of 534 articles were retrieved in the initial search. After the review process, only 10 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. Most articles included (80%) were classified as high evidence level. Among several techniques, microhardness was the most frequently method performed by the studies included in this systematic review. Irrespective to the "in vitro" method performed, bulk fill RBCs were partially likely to fulfill the important requirement regarding properly curing in 4 mm of cavity depth measured by depth of cure and / or degree of conversion. In general, low viscosities BFCs performed better regarding polymerization efficiency compared to the high viscosities BFCs.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Curing Lights, Dental , Polymerization , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Hardness , Materials Testing , Polymerization/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Time Factors
6.
Braz Oral Res ; 31: e65, 2017 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28832713

ABSTRACT

The effect of restoration depth on the curing time of a conventional and two bulk-fill composite resins by measuring microhardness and the respective radiosity of the bottom surface of the specimen was investigated. 1-, 3- and 5-mm thick washers were filled with Surefil SDR Flow-U (SDR), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill-IVA (TEC) or Esthet-X HD-B1 (EHD), and cured with Bluephase® G2 for 40s. Additional 1-mm washers were filled with SDR, TEC or EHD, placed above the light sensor of MARC®, stacked with pre-cured 1-, 3- or 5-mm washer of respective material, and cured for 2.5~60s to mimic 2-, 4- and 6-mm thick composite curing. The sensor measured the radiosity (EB) at the bottom of specimen stacks. Vickers hardness (VH) was measured immediately at 5 locations with triplicate specimens. Nonlinear regression of VH vs EB by VH=α[1-exp(-EB/ß)] with all thickness shows that the values of α, maximum hardness, are 21.6±1.0 kg/mm2 for SDR, 38.3±0.6 kg/mm2 for TEC and 45.3±2.6 kg/mm2 for EHD, and the values of ß, rate parameter, are 0.40±0.06 J/cm2 for SDR, 0.77±0.04 J/cm2 for TEC and 0.58±0.09 J/cm2 for EHD. The radiosity of the bottom surface was calculated when the bottom surface of each material attained 80% of α of each material. The curing times for each material are in agreement with manufacturer recommendation for thickness. It is possible to estimate time needed to cure composite resin of known depth adequately by the radiosity and microhardness of the bottom surface.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Analysis of Variance , Hardness Tests , Linear Models , Materials Testing , Polymerization , Polymethyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Polymethyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Resin Cements/chemistry , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors
7.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 31(supl.1): e59, Aug. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-889456

ABSTRACT

Abstract This systematic review assessed the literature to evaluate the efficiency of polymerization of bulk-fill composite resins at 4 mm restoration depth. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched with no restrictions on year, publication status, or article's language. Selection criteria included studies that evaluated bulk-fill composite resin when inserted in a minimum thickness of 4 mm, followed by curing according to the manufacturers' instructions; presented sound statistical data; and comparison with a control group and/or a reference measurement of quality of polymerization. The evidence level was evaluated by qualitative scoring system and classified as high-, moderate- and low- evidence level. A total of 534 articles were retrieved in the initial search. After the review process, only 10 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. Most articles included (80%) were classified as high evidence level. Among several techniques, microhardness was the most frequently method performed by the studies included in this systematic review. Irrespective to the "in vitro" method performed, bulk fill RBCs were partially likely to fulfill the important requirement regarding properly curing in 4 mm of cavity depth measured by depth of cure and / or degree of conversion. In general, low viscosities BFCs performed better regarding polymerization efficiency compared to the high viscosities BFCs.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Polymerization , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Hardness , Materials Testing , Polymerization/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Time Factors
8.
Clin Oral Investig ; 21(5): 1707-1715, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27714528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the ultramorphological characteristics of tooth-resin interfaces and the bond strength (BS) of multimode adhesive systems to enamel and dentin. METHODS: Multimode adhesives (Scotchbond Universal (SBU) and All-Bond Universal) were tested in both self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes and compared to control groups (Optibond FL and Clearfil SE Bond (CSB)). Adhesives were applied to human molars and composite blocks were incrementally built up. Teeth were sectioned to obtain specimens for microtensile BS and TEM analysis. Specimens were tested after storage for either 24 h or 1 year. SEM analyses were performed to classify the failure pattern of beam specimens after BS testing. RESULTS: Etching increased the enamel BS of multimode adhesives; however, BS decreased after storage for 1 year. No significant differences in dentin BS were noted between multimode and control in either evaluation period. Storage for 1 year only reduced the dentin BS for SBU in self-etch mode. TEM analysis identified hybridization and interaction zones in dentin and enamel for all adhesives. Silver impregnation was detected on dentin-resin interfaces after storage of specimens for 1 year only with the SBU and CSB. CONCLUSIONS: Storage for 1 year reduced enamel BS when adhesives are applied on etched surface; however, BS of multimode adhesives did not differ from those of the control group. In dentin, no significant difference was noted between the multimode and control group adhesives, regardless of etching mode. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In general, multimode adhesives showed similar behavior when compared to traditional adhesive techniques. Multimode adhesives are one-step self-etching adhesives that can also be used after enamel/dentin phosphoric acid etching, but each product may work better in specific conditions.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Enamel/chemistry , Water/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental , Composite Resins , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Materials Testing , Methacrylates , Microscopy, Electron , Molar , Resin Cements , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength
9.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 31: e65, 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952107

ABSTRACT

Abstract The effect of restoration depth on the curing time of a conventional and two bulk-fill composite resins by measuring microhardness and the respective radiosity of the bottom surface of the specimen was investigated. 1-, 3- and 5-mm thick washers were filled with Surefil SDR Flow-U (SDR), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill-IVA (TEC) or Esthet-X HD-B1 (EHD), and cured with Bluephase® G2 for 40s. Additional 1-mm washers were filled with SDR, TEC or EHD, placed above the light sensor of MARC®, stacked with pre-cured 1-, 3- or 5-mm washer of respective material, and cured for 2.5~60s to mimic 2-, 4- and 6-mm thick composite curing. The sensor measured the radiosity (EB) at the bottom of specimen stacks. Vickers hardness (VH) was measured immediately at 5 locations with triplicate specimens. Nonlinear regression of VH vs EB by VH=α[1-exp(-EB/β)] with all thickness shows that the values of α, maximum hardness, are 21.6±1.0 kg/mm2 for SDR, 38.3±0.6 kg/mm2 for TEC and 45.3±2.6 kg/mm2 for EHD, and the values of β, rate parameter, are 0.40±0.06 J/cm2 for SDR, 0.77±0.04 J/cm2 for TEC and 0.58±0.09 J/cm2 for EHD. The radiosity of the bottom surface was calculated when the bottom surface of each material attained 80% of α of each material. The curing times for each material are in agreement with manufacturer recommendation for thickness. It is possible to estimate time needed to cure composite resin of known depth adequately by the radiosity and microhardness of the bottom surface.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Curing Lights, Dental , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Linear Models , Analysis of Variance , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Resin Cements/chemistry , Polymethyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Polymethyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Polymerization , Hardness Tests
10.
Rev. Assoc. Paul. Cir. Dent ; 70(3): 250-254, jul.-set. 2016. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-797078

ABSTRACT

Novas tecnologias aliadas a novos materiais vêm de encontro à filosofia de facilitar a clínica diária, diminuindo o número de passos, consequentemente diminuindo a chance de erro se utilizando menos tempo clínico para obter bons resultados. Paciente do gênero masculino,38 anos, apresentava uma restauração classe II OD deficiente no elemento 36. Foi realizado oexame clínico, radiográfico e seleção de cor. Sobre isolamento absoluto, a restauração antiga e a lesão de cárie foram removidas. Para a realização da nova restauração foi utilizado um sistema de matriz seccional e uma resina composta de baixa tensão de contração de polimerização e baixa viscosidade com a técnica bulk-fill, seguida por uma resina convencional como é preconizado.Pode-se observar que a técnica bulk-fill é bastante simples quando comparada à técnica incremental tradicional e aliada ao uso do sistema de matrizes seccionais otimizam ainda mais o dia-a-dia na clínica.


New technologies associated with new materials have been introduced to facilitate the dailyclinical procedures, reducing the number of steps, thus reducing the chance of mistakes andchair time for clinical procedures. Male patient, 38 years old, had a deficient OD class II restorationin the lower left first molar. Clinical examination, x-ray and color selection were performed.Using rubber dam isolation, the old restoration and caries were removed. For the new restorationa sectional matrix system and a low-stress flowable bulk-fill composite were used, followedby a conventional nanohybrid composite as recommended. It can be seen that the bulk-fill techniqueis quite simple compared to the traditional incremental technique and combined withthe system of sectional matrix system further optimize the restorative procedures.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Dentistry, Operative/instrumentation , Dentistry, Operative/methods , Dentistry, Operative , Composite Resins/analysis , Composite Resins , Composite Resins/adverse effects
11.
J Adhes Dent ; 17(5): 427-32, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26525007

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a bulk-fill low-stress resin-based composite to dentin from gingival walls of Class II MOD cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class II MOD cavities were prepared in 44 human molars with the distal and mesial proximal boxes 4 and 6 mm deep, respectively. Eight experimental groups (n = 11) were obtained by a factorial design including 1. "composite" in two levels: a bulk-fill low-stress composite (SureFil SDR Flow, Dentsply Caulk) and a conventional composite (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE); 2. "filling technique" in two levels: bulk-fill (Bf) and incremental (In); and 3. "depth" in two levels: 4 mm and 6 mm in order to create different polymerization conditions. Twenty-four hours after placement of restorations, teeth were sectioned into beams with a cross-sectional bonded area of approximately 1 mm2. Bonded beams obtained from the gingival walls of the proximal boxes were tested in tension at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were submitted to a 3-way ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Tukey's test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: ANOVA failed to identify significant differences for the triple and double interaction between factors. However, significant differences were observed for the factors "composite" and "filling technique" (p < 0.05). SDR presented significantly higher µTBS values for bulk and incremental filling techniques (p < 0.05), and the incremental filling technique presented significantly higher µTBS values for both composites (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the bulk-fill flowable composite SDR may improve the bond strength to the gingival walls of Class II MOD cavities.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Dental Cavity Preparation/classification , Dental Materials/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Curing Lights, Dental , Dental Stress Analysis/instrumentation , Dentin/ultrastructure , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Humans , Materials Testing , Matrix Bands , Nanocomposites/chemistry , Polymerization , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength
13.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 33(2): 98-103, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25654424

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of cavity preparation and restorative materials containing fluorides in the prevention of secondary caries lesion development in situ. METHODS: A total of 120 blocks obtained from human teeth were divided into two groups and standardized cavities were prepared using diamond burs (DB) or Er,Cr:YSGG-laser [20 Hz, 4.0W, 55% water, 65% air (LA)]. They were divided into three subgroups according to the restorative material (n=20): glass-ionomer cement (GI), resin modified glass-ionomer (RM) or composite resin (CR). Blocks were fixed in palatal intra-oral appliances worn in situ by 20 human volunteers, who dropped 20% sucrose solution eight times daily. After 21 days, blocks were removed and restorations were cross-sectioned to evaluate microhardness [Knoop hardness number (KHN)] underneath enamel surface from 30 to 200 µm. Factors "cavity preparation," "restorative materials," and "depth" were evaluated by three way ANOVA, followed by Tukey test (p<0.05). RESULTS: The results showed lower microhardness in cavities prepared with DB than in cavities prepared with LA. At 30 µm, there were no statistical significant differences with regard to "cavity preparation" or "restorative materials" factors. In depth evaluation, the enamel microhardness progressively increased as a function of depth for the GI groups. In the groups prepared with LA at 60 µm/90 µm, there were no significant differences between GI and RM materials, whose microhardnesses were significantly higher than that of CR. CONCLUSIONS: Cavity preparation using Er,Cr:YSGG laser increases caries resistance of enamel walls, and reduce caries lesion depth development regardless of fluoride presence in the restorative material. CR showed higher caries lesion development than GI, and RM showed intermediate results.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Glass Ionomer Cements , Lasers, Solid-State , Low-Level Light Therapy , Humans , Tissue Culture Techniques
14.
Braz. dent. sci ; 17(1): 16-22, 2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: lil-728110

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study evaluated the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and microhardness (µKH) of conventional (CO) and hybrid resin-modified glass ionomer (RM). Material and methods: Nine specimens to UTS and twelve for µKHN of glass ionomer materials were obtained using special molds. The materials were manipulated and CO groups were allowed to self-cure for five minutes and RM were subjected to light-activation as indicated by manufactures through a glass slide. All specimens were dark-stored in 100% relative humidity for 24 h. For UTS test, specimens were tested in tension in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed of 1 mm/ min) until failure. For µKHN test a Knoop diamond indenter was used to make five indentations in the upper/light irradiated surface of the specimens. UTS and µKHN data were submitted to one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test (α = 5%). Results: The results for UTS were: Ionomaster: 7.0 (± 1.6) A; Maxxion R: 8.8 (± 3.7) A Vidrion R: 8.8 (± 3.9) A; ChemFil Rock: 10.7 (± 4.6) AB; Vitremer: 13.1 (± 3.3)BC; Vitrofil R: 14.9 (± 7.8)CD; Ionoseal: 14.5 (± 8.2)CD; Resiglass: 16.3 (± 2.3)D. The results for µKH: Ionomaster: 24.3 (± 6.6)B; Maxxion R: 17.7 (± 4.7) A, Vidrion R: 31.0 (± 9.4) B; ChemFil Rock: 31.1 (± 8.5)B; Vitremer: 20.3 (± 3.3) A; Vitrofil R: 16.5 (± 5.1) A; Ionoseal: 13.1 (± 8.5) A; Resiglass: 21.6 (± 5.2) A. Conclusion: It was observed that the hybrid resin-modified ionomers generally have higher cohesive strength than conventional ones, but lower microhardness


Objetivo: Este estudo avaliou a resistência coesiva (UTS) e microdureza (μKH) de materiais ionoméricos, convencional (CO) e híbrido de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina (RM). Material e Métodos: Nove amostras para UTS e doze para μKHN de materiais ionoméricos foram preparadas utilizando matrizes especiais. Os materiais foram manipulados e grupos CO sofreram a autocura durante cinco minutos e os RM foram submetidos à ativação por luz como indicado pelos fabricantes através de uma lamínula de vidro. Todos os espécimes foram armazenados no escuro, em 100 % de umidade relativa por 24 horas. Para o teste de UTS, os espécimes foram testados em tensão numa máquina de ensaios universal (velocidade de 1 mm/min ) até a falha. Para o teste μKH um diamante penetrador tipo Knoop foi usado para fazer 5 endentações na parte superior; irradiada pela luz na superfície dos espécimes. Os dados de UTS e de μKHN foram submetidos a one-way ANOVA, seguido pelo teste de Tukey (α = 5%). Resultados: Os resultados para UTS foram: Ionomaster: 7,0 (± 1,6) A; Maxxion R: 8,8 (± 3,7) A Vidrion R: 8,8 (± 3,9) A; Chemfil Rock: 10,7 (± 4,6) AB; Vitremer: 13,1 (± 3,3)BC; Vitrofil R: 14,9 (± 7,8) CD; Ionoseal: 14,5 (± 8,2) CD; Resiglass: 16,3 (± 2,3)D. Os resultados para μKH: Ionomaster: 24,3 (± 6,6) B; Maxxion R: 17,7 (± 4,7) A, Vidrion R: 31,0 (± 9,4) B; Chemfil Rock: 31,1 (± 8,5) B; Vitremer: 20,3 (± 3,3) A; Vitrofil R: 16,5 (± 5,1) A; Ionoseal: 13,1 (± 8,5) A; Resiglass: 21,6 (± 5,2) A. Conclusão: Observou-se que os híbridos de ionômero de vidro modificados por resina geralmente têm força coesiva mais alta do que os convencionais, mas menor dureza.


Subject(s)
Glass Ionomer Cements , Hardness , Tensile Strength
15.
Lasers Med Sci ; 28(4): 1069-76, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22886136

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the effects of different parameters of dentin irradiation with erbium -doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser on bond strength to dentin and analyzed the ultramorphological characteristics of resin-laser-irradiated dentin interfaces using a transmission electron microscope (TEM). Dentin surfaces were abraded with SiC paper (600 grit) or Er:YAG laser-irradiated (120/4, 140/6, 180/4, or 200/6 mJ/Hz). Three adhesive systems were tested: Single Bond Plus (3M ESPE), Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray Med.), and Clearfil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray Med.). Treatments were performed over flat dentin surfaces of human third molars. Specimens were stored in distilled water for 1 week or 6 months and prepared for a microtensile bond strength test and interfacial ultrastructure for analysis. Microtensile bond strength data (n = 5) were analyzed with three-way analysis of variance. Irradiation with Er:YAG laser did not reduce the bond strength values for self-etching adhesives even after 6 months of water storage. The hybrid layer formation was observed only when the adhesives were applied to non-irradiated dentin (control group). Nanoleakage occurred in all resin-dentin interfaces using Single Bond Plus for both periods. Nanoleakage pattern and bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dentin were less affected by Er:YAG laser irradiation and by the 6-month storage in water than was those of the etch-and-rinse adhesive. TEM analysis revealed no hybridization when dentin was laser-irradiated. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Minimally invasive caries removal has been proposed. Nevertheless, bonding mechanisms to lased dentin are not entirely described. Knowing the interaction between the treated dentin and bonding agents and its behavior over time is of utmost importance for new technologies. Regarding that, two-bottle self-etching adhesive system provided a more consistent evidence of its better behavior when bonding to lased substrate.


Subject(s)
Dentin/radiation effects , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Dental Cements/therapeutic use , Dental Etching/methods , Dentin/ultrastructure , Humans , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Resins, Synthetic/therapeutic use , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Time Factors
16.
Odontology ; 101(1): 52-9, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22438086

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the previous application of a casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate paste (MI Paste, MI) and adhesive systems on the bond durability of a fissure sealant. Ninety-eight enamel blocks were obtained from proximal surfaces of erupted third molars. Specimens were divided into 14 groups (n = 7) according to the previous application of MI (with and without) and the adhesive systems used (no adhesive system; hydrophobic resin of a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system; etch-and-rinse single-bottle adhesive system; all-in-one adhesive system; two-step self-etching adhesive system; additional phosphoric acid conditioning and all-in-one adhesive system; additional phosphoric acid conditioning and two-step self-etching adhesive system). A fissure sealant (Fluroshield) was applied and photoactivated for 20 s. Beams (~0.7 mm(2)) were prepared for the microtensile bond strength test, which was executed after 24 h or 6 months of water storage. Fractured specimens were analyzed by scanning electronic microscopy. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures/Tukey's test (P < 0.05). Groups that received MI application and adhesive systems presented higher means than those groups where MI was not applied. Higher frequency of cohesive failures was observed for groups with MI. Applying a CPP-ACP containing paste on enamel before adhesive systems was an effective method to increase bond durability of the sealant tested.


Subject(s)
Caseins/chemistry , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Pit and Fissure Sealants/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Dental Etching/methods , Dental Restoration Failure , Humans , Molar, Third , Tensile Strength
17.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 13(4): 464-71, 2012 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23151694

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the influence of short-term NaOCl-storage and long-term water storage on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of etch-and-rinse adhesive system to human dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six third human molars were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 6) according to the aging protocol: G1 (water, 24 hours); G2 (water, 6 months); G3 (water, 12 months); G4 (10% sodium hypochlorite--NaOCl, 1 hour); G5 (10% NaOCl, 3 hours) and G6 (10% NaOCl, 5 hours). A two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2) was applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. A composite (Filtek Z250) was applied in four horizontal increments and was individually cured. Specimens were cut following the microtensile test technique, submitted to the different aging protocols, and tested in tension. The fracture pattern was observed in a stereomicroscope (40* magnification) and in a scanning electron microscope. The µTBS data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The effect of storage in 10% NaOCl for 1 or 3 hours was not significantly different from that of aging in distilled water (DW) for 6 or 12 months (p > 0.05). Beams immersed in DW for 24 hours and in 10% NaOCl for 5 hours showed the highest and lowest µTBS values respectively. CONCLUSION: The aging protocols negatively influenced dentin bond strength. Aging specimens in 10% NaOCl for 1 or 3 hours can be an alternative method for long-term water storage (6 or 12 months) bond strength studies. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This aging protocol allows a quick achievement of longitudinal bond strength data, so that results are available to the professionals in this area while the materials are yet present at the dental market.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Cements , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Drug Storage , Resin Cements/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins , Humans , Immersion , Sodium Hypochlorite , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tensile Strength , Time Factors , Water
18.
Eur J Dent ; 6(4): 349-60, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23077413

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of nanofillers incorporated into adhesives on the microtensile bond strength (µ-TBS) and interfacial micromorphology to dentin. METHODS: The occlusal enamel of 5 human molars was removed and each tooth sectioned into four quarters. The exposed dentin was treated with one of the following adhesives: Adper Single Bond (SB-unfilled), OptiBond Solo Plus (OS-barium aluminoborosilicate, 400nm Ø), Prime & Bond NT (NT-colloidal silica, 7-40 nm Ø) and Adper Single Bond 2 (SB2-colloidal silica, 5nm Ø). Cylinders of resin-based composite were constructed on the adhesive layers. After 24-hour storage, the restored tooth-quadrants were sectioned to obtain stick-shaped specimens (0.8 mm2, cross-sectional area) and submitted to µ-TBS at a cross-speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = .05). Twenty-eight additional teeth were used for interfacial micro-morphologic analysis by SEM (16-teeth) and TEM (12-teeth). The dentin surfaces of 32 discs were treated with the adhesives (8 discs for adhesive) and laminated to form disc-pairs using a flowable resin composite for SEM/EDS analysis. For TEM, 90nm-thick nondemineralized unstained sections were processed. RESULTS: SB2 showed significant higher bond strength than SB, OS and NT. The SEM/EDS and TEM analysis revealed nanofillers infiltrated within the interfibrillar spaces of the SB2-hybrid layer. Fillers were concentrated around patent tubular orifices and in the adhesive layer for OS and NT. CONCLUSION: The presence of nanofillers within the interfibrillar spaces of the SB2-hybrid layer suggests its importance in the improvement of the µ-TBS.

19.
Braz Oral Res ; 26(2): 170-6, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22473354

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effects of resin luting agents (LA) polymerized using increased temperature on the in vitro microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of indirect restorations to dentin. The occlusal dentin surfaces of 40 human third molars were exposed and flattened. The teeth were assigned to 8 groups (n = 5) according to the LA temperature (25°C o r 50°C), curing mode (dual- or self-curing mode), and product (Excite DSC/Variolink II [VII] and XP Bond/Calibra [Cal]). The bonding agents were applied to the dentin surfaces according to manufacturers' instructions. For preheated groups, the LAs were heated to 50°C, subsequently mixed on a heated stirrer surface, and applied to the previously heated pre-polymerized resin discs (2 mm thickness, TPH-Spectrum). The discs were bonded to the dentin surfaces, and the LAs were either exposed to a curing light according to manufacturers' instructions or allowed to self-cure. Specimens were stored in relative humidity at 37°C for 7 days. Specimens were mesio-distally and bucco-lingually sectioned to obtain multiple bonded beams with a 1-mm² cross-sectional area for mTBS testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (a = 5%) for each product. Specimen failure patterns were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. VII groups showed higher mTBS at 50°C than at 25°C regardless of curing mode (p = 0.05). Cal groups showed similar mTBS at 25°C and 50°C in all activation modes. The use of some dual-polymerizing LAs at 50°C may improve the mTBS of indirect restorations to dentin.


Subject(s)
Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Dentin/drug effects , Resin Cements/chemistry , Self-Curing of Dental Resins/methods , Analysis of Variance , Dental Restoration Failure , Dentin/chemistry , Hot Temperature , Humans , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Polymerization , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Time Factors
20.
Braz. oral res ; 26(2): 170-176, Mar.-Apr. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-622913

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effects of resin luting agents (LA) polymerized using increased temperature on the in vitro microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of indirect restorations to dentin. The occlusal dentin surfaces of 40 human third molars were exposed and flattened. The teeth were assigned to 8 groups (n = 5) according to the LA temperature (25°C o r 50°C), curing mode (dual- or self-curing mode), and product (Excite DSC/Variolink II [VII] and XP Bond/Calibra [Cal]). The bonding agents were applied to the dentin surfaces according to manufacturers' instructions. For preheated groups, the LAs were heated to 50°C, subsequently mixed on a heated stirrer surface, and applied to the previously heated pre-polymerized resin discs (2 mm thickness, TPH-Spectrum). The discs were bonded to the dentin surfaces, and the LAs were either exposed to a curing light according to manufacturers' instructions or allowed to self-cure. Specimens were stored in relative humidity at 37°C for 7 days. Specimens were mesio-distally and bucco-lingually sectioned to obtain multiple bonded beams with a 1-mm² cross-sectional area for mTBS testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (a = 5%) for each product. Specimen failure patterns were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. VII groups showed higher mTBS at 50°C than at 25°C regardless of curing mode (p = 0.05). Cal groups showed similar mTBS at 25°C and 50°C in all activation modes. The use of some dual-polymerizing LAs at 50°C may improve the mTBS of indirect restorations to dentin.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Dentin/drug effects , Resin Cements/chemistry , Self-Curing of Dental Resins/methods , Analysis of Variance , Dental Restoration Failure , Dentin/chemistry , Hot Temperature , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Polymerization , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...