Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37552190

ABSTRACT

Various techniques have been proposed to regenerate deficient ridges after tooth removal, including guided bone regeneration, block grafting, distraction osteogenesis, and ridge splitting. However, these procedures are technique-sensitive and often present complications which prevent reconstruction of the deficient ridge and implant placement. In an atrophic anterior or posterior maxilla, these techniques often fail to produce satisfactory long-term outcomes due to the poor bone quality, pneumatization of the maxillary sinus, and the highly cosmetic patient demands. The customized alveolar ridge-splitting (CARS) technique was introduced to improve outcomes and minimize the risk of complications. The synergistic combination of this technique with another augmentation procedure-including lateral window sinus augmentation and guided bone regeneration-allows implant placement into ridges with deficient bone volume both vertically and horizontally. This study presents two case reports that were successfully treated with the CARS technique and additional augmentation techniques to treat severely atrophic ridges in the anterior and posterior maxilla.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Humans , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Bone Transplantation/methods , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Bone Regeneration , Alveolar Process/surgery , Maxillary Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Maxillary Sinus/surgery , Maxilla/surgery
2.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent ; 43(2): 166-172, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520132

ABSTRACT

Implants present a predictable fixed option for patients who require tooth extraction. However, complications such as implant failure reduce the success of replacement implant restorations. A patient presented to the Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry (New York University College of Dentistry) with pain related to a broken implant-supported prosthesis. Two failed implants were removed, and new implants were placed. After restoration delivery, the patient reported soreness on the implant at site 35 (FDI tooth-numbering system), which was then removed (along with a sequestrum of bone) and sent for biopsy. A new implant was placed and restored successfully at the 1-year follow-up. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate that with proper planning, surgery, and restoration, a new implant can be successfully placed and restored on a site with two previous failures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2023;43:167-172. doi: 10.11607/prd.5410.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants, Single-Tooth , Dental Implants , Humans , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent ; 43(4): e173-e180, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520127

ABSTRACT

Currently, there are several techniques being used in the posterior mandible to increase alveolar bone height and width. However, each of these has potential complications and limitations. The purpose of the current study was to present the surgical technique and restorative considerations for implant placement lateral to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) in cases of severely atrophic edentulous posterior mandibles. In the current study, 26 implants in 16 patients were successfully placed lateral to IAN and restored with splinted screw-retained prostheses with a follow-up time after loading ranging from 3 months to 6 years. Two patients reported complications. One patient had a temporary paresthesia that resolved 3 months after implant placement and the second patient had minor paresthesia which was reduced after implant removal but remained in a small area on the left corner of her lip.

4.
Compend Contin Educ Dent ; 43(5): E5-eE8, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35523316

ABSTRACT

Although the term "halitosis" was first coined in 1874, people have become increasingly aware of this problem more recently during the COVID-19 pandemic due to extensive wearing of protective masks. In fact, following dental caries and periodontal disease, halitosis is the third most prevalent reason for patients going to the dentist. Due to multifactorial etiology, the diagnosis of halitosis requires a rigorous health/dental/social history, a clinical examination, and measurements. The treatment ranges from the use of dentifrices, mouthwashes, tongue scraping, and masking products, and more recently includes photodynamic therapy, probiotics, and ozone. The purpose of this narrative review was to examine the published literature concerning halitosis over the past 30 years and discuss the diagnosis, etiology, and treatment of the disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dental Caries , Halitosis , Halitosis/diagnosis , Halitosis/etiology , Halitosis/therapy , Humans , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Pandemics
5.
Compend Contin Educ Dent ; 43(1): 40-45, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34951944

ABSTRACT

Because of their documented long-term success rates, dental implants have become a predictable treatment option to replace hopeless or missing teeth. However, full-arc transition from a hopeless dentition to a prosthesis supported by dental implants remains a challenge. One treatment option for this process is the use of transitional implants, an approach that allows for the transitioning of full-arch reconstructions from teeth to implant-supported prostheses without immediate loading the permanent implants or the need for provisional removable partial dentures. This article, which presents a long-term clinical case report, describes the steps and sequence of therapy involved in transitioning from a hopeless dentition to a maxillary full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitation with the use of transitional implants, avoiding removable provisional prostheses. An assessment of the 20-year follow-up, dental implant survival rates, and marginal bone loss is also presented.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Maxilla/surgery
6.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent ; 41(4): e139-e146, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34328468

ABSTRACT

Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) damage following implant placement is a severe complication that can compromise a patient's quality of life. Previous studies have suggested that a safety zone of 2 mm, if maintained, might avoid this problem. This retrospective study evaluates implants placed in closer proximity to the IAN without resulting in any postoperative neurologic complications and suggests a new concept of safety distance. A total of 60 consecutive patients receiving 101 mandibular implants < 2 mm from the IAN were included in this study. All enrolled patients had a CBCT scan done for radiologic assessment before implant placement and following final restoration. Measurements were obtained through cross-sectional views using Simplant software. In patients without neurologic disturbances, a mean distance of +0.75 mm was seen from the closest portion of the implant to the nerve bundle. In cases where a direct transection and/or compression of the nerve was not observed, the patients did not experience neurosensory disturbances.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Implants/adverse effects , Humans , Mandible , Mandibular Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34076636

ABSTRACT

Implant-supported restorations have proven to be a predictable option for replacing missing teeth. In cases of inadequate bone quantity, the bone volume can be increased by bone augmentation procedures. Several factors can affect bone regeneration, including the morphology of the defect at the implant site. A defect surrounded by bony walls (an intraosseous defect) is known to yield a highly successful regeneration. The purpose of this retrospective case series study was to present a new step-by-step surgical procedure known as the Custom Alveolar Ridge-Splitting (CARS) technique for maxillary anterior ridge augmentation. This technique creates an intraosseous defect while splitting and augmenting an atrophic ridge. Sixteen consecutive cases were treated with the CARS procedure. All implants were restored and followed for 12 to 24 months after loading, and all cases were effectively treated with successful implant placement. According to this retrospective study, the CARS procedure is simple, successful, and predictable and may be used as a surgical option for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation in the anterior maxilla.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Maxilla , Alveolar Process/surgery , Bone Transplantation , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Humans , Maxilla/surgery , Retrospective Studies
8.
Evid Based Dent ; 19(3): 80-81, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30361652

ABSTRACT

Data sourcesAn electronic search without time or language restrictions was undertaken using several databases: PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register and ongoing clinical trials. Manual searches were performed in dental implant related journals and reference lists of identified studies, and relevant reviews were scanned for possible additional studies.Study selectionEligibility criteria included human clinical studies, either randomised or not, comparing implant failure rates, MBL and/or post-operative infection in any group of patients receiving turned (machined) and anodised-surface (TiUnite) implants, both from the same implant manufacturer.Data extraction and synthesisThe titles and abstracts of all reports identified through the electronic searches were read independently by the three authors. For studies appearing to meet the inclusion criteria, or for which there were insufficient data in the title and abstract to make a clear decision, the full report was obtained. Disagreements were resolved by discussion between the authors. Quality assessment of the studies was executed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), which is a quality assessment tool used when observational studies are also included in systematic reviews.ResultsThirty-eight publications were included. The results suggest a risk ratio =2.82(95%CI, 1.95 - 4.06, P < 0.00001) for failure of turned implants when compared to anodised-surface implants. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results when only the studies inserting implants in maxillae or mandibles were pooled. There were no statistically significant effects of turned implants on the MBL (mean difference [MD]=0.02, (95%CI, 0.16 - 0.20; P = 0 82) in comparison to anodised implants. The results of a meta-regression considering the follow-up period as a covariate suggested an increase of the MD with the increase in the follow-up time (MD increase 0.012 mm year 1), however, without a statistical significance (P = 0.813). Due to lack of satisfactory information, meta-analysis for the outcome 'post-operative infection' was not performed.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of the existing investigations, the present study suggests that turned implants have a statistically higher probability to fail than anodised-surface implants, regardless of whether the implants were placed in maxilla or mandible. There were no statistically significant effects of turned implants on the MBL when compared with anodised implants. A comparison of post-operative infection between the implant types was not possible, due to lack of sufficient information. The reliability and validity of the data collected, the limitations of the quality assessment tool and the potential for biases and confounding factors are some of the shortcomings of the present study. The results have to be interpreted with caution due to the presence of several confounding factors in the included studies.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Humans , Mandible , Maxilla , Reproducibility of Results
9.
Evid Based Dent ; 19(2): 62, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29930375

ABSTRACT

Data sourcesThe Pubmed, Evidence-Based Dentistry, BMJ Clinical Evidence, EmbaseDynamed, and www.opengrey.eu databases and manual search of reference lists.Study selectionRandomised clinical trials (RCTs) were accepted if they had: participants with no periodontal disease and teeth restored with SCs or FDPs and compared fibre posts and other prosthetic systems and evaluated the prosthetic complications with a minimum observational period of 36 months.Data extraction and synthesisTitles and abstracts were evaluated independently by two reviewers, any disagreement was discussed with a third reviewer. The agreement for the two reviewers was 97%. The quality and the risk of bias of the studies included was assessed following the Cochrane Handbook considering the domains of randomisation, sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria, follow-up achieved, blinding, withdrawing and groups' compatibility for quality assessment, and for the risk of bias the domains evaluated were allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessor and follow-up.ResultsThe database search yielded 4,230 records; after duplications removal, 3,670 records were reviewed independently by the authors, and four articles were chosen to include in the systematic review.The most frequently reported failures in the available studies were as follows: fibre post debonding, loss of retention of single crowns and marginal gaps. Less frequently, chippings and fractures were recorded in SCs. No studies about complications related to FDPs were found.The failure rate ranged from 0 to 28.2%.ConclusionsA correlation between the failure rates of fibre posts and the type of prosthetic restoration (SCs or FDPs ) cannot be found. Further RCTs are required to achieve evidence-based conclusions, particularly about the use of fibre posts with FDPs.


Subject(s)
Crowns/adverse effects , Dental Debonding/adverse effects , Dental Prosthesis/adverse effects , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Restoration, Permanent/adverse effects , Post and Core Technique/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dental Prosthesis Design , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...