ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Dyspeptic symptoms belong to the most frequent reasons to seek medical advice and are a burden both for the individual affected and the healthcare system. In Japan, the traditional herbal Kampo prescription rikkunshito has proven benefit for this indication. METHODS: In a prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study (NIS), the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a two-week treatment with the registered rikkunshito extract product YamatoGast was assessed in German patients with an acute episode of dyspeptic symptoms of functional origin under real-world conditions. The primary endpoint was the responsiveness to treatment assessed by the overall treatment effect (OTE) score. Secondary endpoints were the change in severity of dyspeptic symptoms and the change in quality of life (QoL). Safety evaluation was based on reported adverse drug reactions, drug compliance, and ratings of tolerability by physicians and patients. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were enrolled (mean age 48.9 years, 74% females). The treatment was well tolerated and highly beneficial, as expressed by pronounced responder rates of 78.9% for the primary endpoint OTE. All secondary endpoints were also met. The severity of dyspeptic symptoms significantly improved by 62-77% compared to baseline, confirmed by a remarkable improvement of QoL. Significant symptom relief started from the third day of treatment onwards. CONCLUSION: In this non-interventional study, two-week treatment with YamatoGast resulted in a significant improvement of dyspeptic symptoms and was associated with high patient response and satisfaction. YamatoGast was confirmed as a safe and clinically relevant therapeutic option for patients suffering upper gastrointestinal complaints in routine practice.
ABSTRACT
The Japanese traditional herbal medicine, Kampo, has gradually reemerged and 148 different formulations (mainly herbal extracts) can be prescribed within the national health insurance system. The objective of this article is to introduce Kampo and to present information from previous clinical studies that tested Kampo formulae. In addition, suggestions on the design of future research will be stated. The literature search was based on a summary, up until January 2009, by the Japanese Society of Oriental Medicine and included only those trials which were also available in either Pubmed or ICHUSHI (Japan Medical Abstracts Society). We included 135 studies, half of these studies (n = 68) used a standard control and 28 a placebo control. Thirty-seven trials were published in English [all randomized controlled trials (RCTs)] and the remaining articles were in Japanese only. The sample size for most studies was small (two-third of the studies included less than 100 patients) and the overall methodological quality appeared to be low. None of the studies used Kampo diagnosis as the basis for the treatment. In order to evaluate Kampo as a whole treatment system, certain aspects should be taken into account while designing studies. RCTs are the appropriate study design to test efficacy or effectiveness; however, within the trial the treatment could be individualized according to the Kampo diagnosis. Kampo is a complex and individualized treatment with a long tradition, and it would be appropriate for further research on Kampo medicine to take this into account.
