Regulation of gambling in Sub-Saharan Africa: findings from a comparative policy analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Commercial gambling markets have undergone unprecedented expansion and diversification in territories across Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This gambling boom has popularised the uptake of gambling products in existing circuits of popular culture, sport and leisure and raised concerns about the extent to which state legislation is equipped to regulate the differentiated impacts of gambling on public health. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative policy analysis. METHODS: This article provides a systematic mapping of the regulatory environment pertaining to gambling across SSA. The review was conducted by obtaining and triangulating data from a desk review of online materials, consultation with regulatory bodies in each territory and the VIXIO Gambling Compliance database. RESULTS: Gambling is legally regulated in 41 of 49 (83.6%) SSA countries, prohibited in 7 (14.3%) and is not legislated for in 1 (2.0%). Of those countries that regulate gambling, 25 (61.0%) countries had dedicated regulators and 16 (39.0%) countries regulated via a government department. Only 2 of 41 (4.9%) countries have published annual reports continuously since the formation of regulatory bodies, and 3 (7.3%) countries have published an incomplete series of reports since the formation. In 36 (87.8%) countries, no reports were published. Enforcement activities were documented by all five regulators that published reports. CONCLUSION: The review uncovered a lack of coherence in regulatory measures and the need for more transparent public reporting across SSA territories. There are also variations in regulating online products and marketing, with most countries lacking apt guidelines for the digital age. Our findings suggest an urgent need to address the regulatory void surrounding online forms of gambling and the promotion of gambling products. This underlines the importance of a public health approach to protect against an increase in gambling-related harms.

[Current standard of care for initial management of open fractures in emergency departments : A nationwide survey in German trauma centers]. / Realität initialer Versorgung offener Frakturen in deutschen Notaufnahmen : Eine Umfrage aus der Sektion NIS der DGU.

BACKGROUND: Limiting the morbidity of open fractures requires highly specific initial treatment. In addition to a stringent surgical strategy, correct antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be associated with an improved outcome. In the current literature, the duration and type of antibiotic prophylaxis are under discussion. The aim of the study was to survey the current initial treatment regimes for open fractures in German emergency departments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: With an online-based anonymous 16-item questionnaire all 3006 members of the German Trauma Society were surveyed. A total of 585 questionnaires (19.5 %) were returned completed. This article presents a descriptive analysis of the current state of treatment. RESULTS: Mainly specialists (35 %), senior physicians (30 %) and chief physicians (17 %) answered as well as interns (8 %) and out-patient practitioners (10 %). Of the participants 65 % did not accept the classification of emergency services; however, 93 % carried out urgent or emergency surgery, 84 % started an antibiotic prophylaxis in the emergency department and 63 % used a standard operating procedure (SOP). A total of 60 % used 1 antibiotic drug, 25 % used 2 and 15 % used 3 or more substances. An antibiotic treatment for more than 3 days was performed by 60 % of participants. CONCLUSION: The early initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be the standard practice in German emergency departments as well as early surgery. Strategies to improve the communication between prehospital and in-hospital teams, as well as graded antibiotic prophylaxis depending on the severity of soft tissue damage are needed.

Discharges against medical advice from voluntary psychiatric units.

About one in every six voluntary mental patients discharges himself against medical advice. But despite the high rate of AMA discharges, the authors found the literature on the subject to be sparse and of little help in explaining why patients leave the hospital against medical advice. They examine the approaches that have been used thus far to study the phenomenon. They also report the findings of their own study, which showed that patients discharged against medical advice had a poorer response to treatment than those discharged in the traditional manner. The study identified factors that contributed to the poor response and were related to the discharge.

Personality characteristics in heroin addicts and nonaddicted prisoners using the Edwards Personality Preference Schedule.

The present study compares the self-reported personality characteristics of heroin addict and nonaddict prisoners using the Edwards Personality Preference Schedule (EPPS) which was corrected for social desirability. Seventy pairs of addicted and nonaddicted criminal offenders were matched for age, education, intelligence, and home environment. The addicted offenders were identified by the pattern of their response to the EPPS as reflected by the significant multivariate results. In addition, significant univariate differences consistent with those previously reported were found. Addicted criminals had stronger succorance, heterosexuality, and aggression needs and less abasement and endurance needs than nonaddicted offenders. Age, educational achievment, intelligence,and home environment had little influence on the prisoners' response to this self-report personality inventory.