Covariation bias in depression - a predictor of treatment response?

Covariation bias, defined as an overestimation of the relationship between fear-relevant stimuli and aversive consequences, is a well-investigated cognitive bias in anxiety disorders. As patients with affective disorders also show biased information processing, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether depressed patients also display a covariation bias between negative stimuli and aversive consequences. Covariation estimates of 62 inpatients with a current severe depressive episode were assessed at admission (n = 31) or after 6 weeks of treatment (n = 31) and were compared in a between-group design with 31 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. All participants showed a covariation bias for the relationship between negative stimuli and aversive consequences. Moreover, covariation bias at admission was significantly associated with various clinician- and self-reported dimensional measures of treatment response assessed 6 weeks later (Global Assessment of Functioning, Clinical Global Impression Scale, and Beck Depression Inventory), i.e., patients with a stronger bias showed greater impairment after 6 weeks of treatment. Categorical analyses revealed that overall, treatment non-responders-but not responders-were characterized by a covariation bias. The naturalistic study design without standardized pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments is a central limitation. We conclude that the covariation bias may constitute a possible marker in the field of emotional information processing in the search for effective predictors of therapy outcome.

Childhood trauma dependent anxious depression sensitizes HPA axis function.

Anxious depression is a common subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD) and is associated with greater severity and poorer outcome. Alterations of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, especially of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) function, are often observed in MDD, but evidence lacks for anxious depression. Childhood adversity is known to influence both the HPA axis and risk of MDD. Therefore, we investigated GR-function in anxious depression dependent on childhood adversity. We enrolled 144 depressed in-patients (49.3% females). Anxious depression was defined using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) anxiety/somatization factor score ≥7. Blood draws were performed at 6 pm before and 3 h after 1.5 mg dexamethasone ingestion for measurement of cortisol, ACTH and blood count to assess GR-function and the immune system. In a subgroup of n = 60 FKBP5 mRNA controlled for FKBP5 genotype was measured before and after dexamethasone. Childhood adversity was evaluated using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). We identified 78 patients (54.2%) with anxious depression who showed a greater severity and worse outcome. These patients were more often exposed to sexual abuse (30% vs. 16%/p = 0.04) and emotional neglect (76% vs. 58%/p = 0.02) than patients with non-anxious depression. Anxious depressed patients showed an enhanced GR-induced FKBP5 mRNA expression (F = 5.128; p = 0.03) and reduced cortisol levels, partly dependent on sexual abuse (F = 7.730; p = 0.006). Additionally, the GR-induced leukocyte response was enhanced in patients with sexual abuse (F = 7.176; p = 0.008). Anxious depression in dependence of childhood trauma is associated with heightened sensitivity of the HPA axis and the immune system which should be considered for treatment algorithms and targets.