Symptoms of anxiety after heart transplantation and their association with mortality: A secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: Few studies, with inconclusive results, have examined the association of anxiety with mortality after heart transplantation (HTx). We examined whether anxiety symptoms, measured several years after HTx, are associated with increased mortality during long-term follow-up. METHODS: Anxiety symptoms were measured with the anxiety subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R) in 142 HTx recipients at a mean of 5.7 years (SD: 3.9) after HTx. Anxiety symptoms' impact on mortality during follow-up for up to 18.6 years was examined with Cox proportional hazard models. We accounted for relevant sociodemographic and clinical variables, including depressive symptoms (measured by the depression subscale of the SCL-90-R), in the multivariate analyses. In additional analyses, we explored the combined effect of anxious and depressive symptomatology. RESULTS: Anxiety symptoms were not significantly associated with mortality (univariate analysis: HR (95% CI): 1.04 (0.75-1.45); p = .813). Exploration of the combined effect of anxious and depressive symptomatology on mortality rendered non-significant results. Depressive symptoms were independently associated with mortality (multivariate analysis: HR (95% CI): 1.86 (1.07-3.24); p = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms' negative impact on survival after HTx was confirmed, while anxiety symptoms were not significantly associated with mortality during long-term follow-up. Anxiety symptoms' predictive role after HTx requires further study.

The Predictive Value of Depression in the Years After Heart Transplantation for Mortality During Long-Term Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: Current understanding of the prognostic impact of depression on mortality after heart transplantation (HTx) is limited. We examined whether depression after HTx is a predictor of mortality during extended follow-up. Subsequently, we explored whether different symptom dimensions of depression could be identified and whether they were differentially associated with mortality. METHODS: Survival analyses were performed in a sample of 141 HTx recipients assessed for depression, measured by self-report of depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory - version 1A [BDI-1A]), at median 5.0 years after HTx, and followed thereafter for survival status for up to 18.6 years. We used uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association of clinically significant depression (BDI-1A total score ≥10), as well as the cognitive-affective and the somatic subscales of the BDI-1A (resulting from principal component analysis) with mortality. In the multivariate analyses, we adjusted for relevant sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Clinically significant depression was a significant predictor of mortality (hazard ratio = 2.088; 95% confidence interval = 1.366-3.192; p = .001). Clinically significant depression also was an independent predictor of mortality in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 1.982; 95% confidence interval = 1.220-3.217; p = .006). The somatic subscale, but not the cognitive-affective subscale, was significantly associated with increased mortality in univariate analyses, whereas neither of the two subscales was an independent predictor of mortality in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Depression measured by self-report after HTx is associated with increased mortality during extended follow-up. Clinical utility and predictive validity of specific depression components require further study.

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients in Scandinavia.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on how, when, or at what intensity exercise should be performed after heart transplantation (HTx). We have recently shown that high-intensity interval training (HIT) is safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the maintenance state after HTx, but studies have not investigated HIT effects in the de novo HTx state. We hypothesized that HIT could be introduced early after HTx and that it could lead to clinically meaningful increases in exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 81 patients a mean of 11 weeks (range, 7-16 weeks) after an HTx. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 9 months of either HIT (4×4-minute intervals at 85%-95% of peak effort) or moderate-intensity continuous training (60%-80% of peak effort). The primary outcome was the effect of HIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training on the change in aerobic exercise capacity, assessed as the peak oxygen consumption (Vo2peak). Secondary outcomes included tolerability, safety, adverse events, isokinetic muscular strength, body composition, health-related quality of life, left ventricular function, hemodynamics, endothelial function, and biomarkers. RESULTS: From baseline to follow-up, 96% of patients completed the study. There were no serious exercise-related adverse events. The population comprised 73% men, and the mean±SD age was 49±13 years. At the 1-year follow-up, the HIT group demonstrated greater improvements than the moderate-intensity continuous training group; the groups showed significantly different changes in the Vo2peak (mean difference between groups, 1.8 mL·kg-1·min-1), the anaerobic threshold (0.28 L/min), the peak expiratory flow (11%), and the extensor muscle exercise capacity (464 J). The 1.8-mL·kg-1·min-1 difference was equal to ≈0.5 metabolic equivalents, which is regarded as clinically meaningful and relevant. Health-related quality of life was similar between the groups, as indicated by results from the Short Form-36 (version 2), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a visual analog scale. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that HIT was a safe, efficient exercise method in de novo HTx recipients. HIT, compared with moderate-intensity continuous training, resulted in a clinically significantly greater change in exercise capacity based on the Vo2peak values (25% versus 15%), anaerobic threshold, peak expiratory flow, and muscular exercise capacity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier NCT01796379.

Cognitive function among long-term survivors of heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is documented early after heart transplantation (HTx), but we lack data on cognitive function beyond the fourth year post-transplant. Against the background of good long-term survival, this knowledge is necessary to improve clinical care throughout the entire post-transplant period. METHODS: We assessed cognitive function with a neuropsychological test battery in a sample of HTx recipients ≥16 years post-transplant. To improve clinical utility, we also applied adapted consensus criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Furthermore, we explored sociodemographic and clinical characteristics possibly related to cognitive function. RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects were included 20.3 (±3.8) years after HTx. Mean age was 57.5 (±14.2) years, and 18.9% were women. Up to 38.9% exhibited impaired test performance (ie, performance at least 1.5 standard deviations below the normative mean) on several individual cognitive measures, especially on measures of processing speed, executive functions, memory, and language functions. One subject was diagnosed with dementia, and 30.1% qualified for MCI. Those with MCI had lower hemoglobin than those without. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of long-term survivors of HTx might be cognitively impaired. The level of impairment appears comparable to what is defined as MCI in the literature. Modifiable factors related to cognitive impairment might exist.

Effect of everolimus vs calcineurin inhibitors on quality of life in heart transplant recipients during a 3-year follow-up: Results of a randomized controlled trial (SCHEDULE).

The Scandinavian heart transplant everolimus de novo study with early calcineurin inhibitors avoidance (SCHEDULE) trial was a 12 month, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial that compared everolimus (EVR; n=56) to conventional CsA (n=59) immunosuppression. Previously, we reported that EVR outperformed CsA in improving renal function and coronary artery vasculopathy, despite a higher rejection rate with EVR. This study aimed to compare the effects of these treatments on quality of life (QoL). Within five post-operative days, patients (mean age 50±13 years, 27% women) were randomized to EVR or a standard CsA dosage (CsA group). This study assessed quality of life (QoL), based on the Short Form-36, EuroQol-5D, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Assessments were performed pre-HTx and 12 and 36 months post-HTx. At 12 and 36 months, the groups showed similar improvements in Short Form-36 measures (at pre-HTx, 12 and 36 months the values were as follows: Physical component summary: EVR: 31.5±110.9, 49.1±9.7, and 47.9±10.6; P<.01; CsA: 32.5±8.2, 48.4±8.5, and 46.5±11.5; P<.01; mental component summary: EVR: 46.0±12.0, 51.7±11.9, and 52.1±13.0; P<.01; CsA: 38.2±12.5, 53.4±7.1, and 54.3±13.0; P<.01); similar decrease in mean BDI (EVR: 10.9±10.2, 5.4±4.7, and 8.1±9.0; P<.01; CsA: 11.8±7.1, 6.3±5.4, and 6.2±6.5; P<.01); and similar Euro Qol-improvements. Thus, in this small-sized study, EVR-based and conventional CsA immunosuppressive strategies produced similar QoL improvements.

Cognitive function after heart transplantation: Comparing everolimus-based and calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown conflicting results concerning the occurrence of cognitive impairment after successful heart transplantation (HTx). Another unresolved issue is the possible differential impact of immunosuppressants on cognitive function. In this study, we describe cognitive function in a cohort of HTx recipients and subsequently compare cognitive function between subjects on either everolimus- or calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression. METHODS: Cognitive function, covering attention, processing speed, executive functions, memory, and language functions, was assessed with a neuropsychological test battery. Thirty-seven subjects were included (everolimus group: n=20; CNI group: n=17). The extent of cerebrovascular pathology was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: About 40% of subjects had cognitive impairment, defined as performance at least 1.5 standard deviations below normative mean in one or several cognitive domains. Cerebrovascular pathology was present in 33.3%. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups across cognitive domains. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high prevalence of cognitive impairment in the sample, plus the known negative impact of cognitive impairment on clinical outcome, our results indicate that cognitive assessment should be an integrated part of routine clinical follow-up after HTx. However, everolimus- and CNI-based immunosuppressive regimens did not show differential impacts on cognitive function.