[Temporary circulatory assistance by Impella™ in interventional cardiology: Observational study and medico-economic assessment after four years of use]. / Assistance circulatoire temporaire par Impella™ en cardiologie interventionnelle : étude observationnelle et bilan médicoéconomique après quatre ans d'utilisation.

OBJECTIVES: During life-threatening emergencies or risky cardiologic interventions, pharmacology can be limited and the use of appropriate medical devices is then necessary. The Impella™ catheter, CP and 2.5, has been referenced for the exclusive use of the interventional cardiology technical platform at Hôpital Nord (AP-HM) in the absence of rapid access to the Extracorporeal Circulation unit. It is a temporary mechanical circulatory support device mainly indicated in refractory cardiogenic shock and coronary angioplasty at high risk of hemodynamic instability. The objective of this study, observational and retrospective, is to carry out a clinical and economic assessment linked to the use of this device over a period of four years (2017-2020). METHODS: The criteria relating to the 71 patients (51 Impella™ CP and 20 Impella™ 2.5) and their clinical evolution as well as the costs and valuation of the stays were determined. RESULTS: In particular, the Impella™ CP enabled myocardial recovery in 18 out of 51 patients and it was an intermediary in the context of heavier care for 11 patients. The balance between expenditure and valuation shows a deficit of -819,937 euros over the study period, with however a probable margin for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The Impella™ is of clinical interest under very specific conditions. Its high cost and the absence of inclusion on the list of reimbursements in addition to Homogeneous Groups of Stays represent a significant financial burden for health care establishments. Thus, optimizing the rating of future stays is a necessity.

Concerns About Lung Cancer Among Prisoners.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have looked at lung cancer in prisoners, despite this population is possibly at increased risk of malignancy. In a previous study, we found an early onset of lung cancer in prisoners. Thus, the present CARCAN study was aimed at assessing the epidemiological characteristics, management, prognosis, and incidence of lung cancer in prisoners compared to a sample of non-prisoner patients. METHOD: We performed a multi-center observational case-control study. Cases were prisoners diagnosed with lung cancer from 2005 to 2013. Controls were non-prisoner lung cancer patients selected from hospital databases and randomly matched to cases (targeted case-control ratio: 1:3). Incidence rates in both groups were calculated using national statistics. RESULTS: Seventy-two cases and 170 controls met inclusion criteria. Cases were mainly men (99%). Mean age at diagnosis was 52.9 (± 11.0) in cases and 64.3 (± 10.1) in controls (p < 0.0001). More case patients were current smokers compared to control patients (83% vs 53%; p < 0.0001). We found no significant differences between the two groups as concerns histologic types, TNM stages at diagnosis, initially-employed treatments, times to management or survival. Incidence rates (2008-2012) in male prisoners were higher than those in the general population in all concerned age groups. CONCLUSION: There is a shift of lung cancer toward young people in prisons. However, the presentation, management, and prognosis of lung cancer are similar between prisoners and non-prisoners. These finding could justify a specific screening policy for the incarcerated populations.