Patients' perspective on their drug therapy after bariatric surgery: A quantitative, cross-sectional interview study.

Drug therapy in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery is challenging. We aimed to investigate the patients' perspective on their drug therapy. This should allow deriving tailored measures to better support patients and their healthcare professionals with drug therapy after bariatric surgery. We conducted a quantitative telephone-based interview study with patients who have undergone bariatric surgery. The interview consisted of assessments in three parts: (i) current drug therapy: prescription, administration and adherence, (ii) changes after bariatric surgery and (iii) adverse events. (i) The 105 enrolled patients were taking a median of 10 (range: 3-30) drugs. In 1017 of 1080 drugs (94%), expectations in drug effectiveness were (rather) met. Of the 105 patients, 27% reported difficulties in drug administration, 44% forgot to take their drugs at least one time and 20% reported deviations from the prescription. (ii) Sixteen percent of the patients observed changes in drug effectiveness or tolerability-additionally to therapy adjustment by physicians. (iii) Seventy-four percent recognised at least one adverse event right before and/or after bariatric surgery, most frequently in gastrointestinal disorders. Patients who have undergone bariatric surgery have to deal with many difficulties in drug handling and adverse events. Our study emphasises the need for better and more individual support for patients with their drug therapy after bariatric surgery and, therefore, suggests a multidisciplinary approach that includes pharmacists. The stronger involvement of the patients' perspective seems to be a valuable source in research and practice.

Protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase IIa study of the safety, tolerability, and symptomatic efficacy of the ROCK-inhibitor Fasudil in patients with Parkinson's disease (ROCK-PD).

Background: The Rho-kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Fasudil has shown symptomatic and disease-modifying effects in Parkinson's disease (PD) models in vitro and in vivo. In Japan, Fasudil has been approved for the treatment of subarachnoid haemorrhage since 1995 and shows a favourable safety profile. Objectives/design: To investigate the safety, tolerability, and symptomatic efficacy of ROCK-inhibitor Fasudil in comparison to placebo in a randomized, national, multicenter, double-blind phase IIa study in patients with PD. Methods/analysis: We plan to include 75 patients with at least 'probable' PD (MDS criteria), Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3, and age 30-80 years in 13 German study sites. Patients must be non-fluctuating and their response to PD medication must have been stable for 6 weeks. Patients will be randomly allocated to treatment with the oral investigational medicinal product (IMP) containing either Fasudil in two dosages, or placebo, for a total of 22 days. As primary analysis, non-inferiority of low/high dose of Fasudil on the combined endpoint consisting of occurrence of intolerance and/or treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) over 22 days will be assessed in a sequential order, starting with the lower dose. Secondary endpoints will include tolerability alone over 22 days and occurrence of treatment-related SAEs (SARs) over 22 and 50 days and will be compared on group level. Additional secondary endpoints include efficacy on motor and non-motor symptoms, measured on established scales, and will be assessed at several timepoints. Biomaterial will be collected to determine pharmacokinetics of Fasudil and its active metabolite, and to evaluate biomarkers of neurodegeneration. Ethics/registration/discussion: After positive evaluation by the competent authority and the ethics committee, patient recruitment started in the 3rd quarter of 2023. ROCK-PD is registered with Eudra-CT (2021-003879-34) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05931575). Results of this trial can pave way for conducting extended-duration studies assessing both symptomatic efficacy and disease-modifying properties of Fasudil.

A prospective intervention study to identify drug-related emergency department visits comparing a standard care group and a pharmaceutical care group.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Adverse drug reactions impose a major burden. Those adverse drug reactions might lead to hospitalization but are often not correctly identified in the emergency department (ED). Clinical pharmacists, although not routinely implemented, can help identify adverse drug reactions. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to examine the drug association of ED visits in a pharmaceutical group with a clinical pharmacist integrated in the ED team compared with a standard group without additional support. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: This prospective intervention study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care university hospital in Leipzig, Germany. Patients who were ≥50 years old were included. From 1 March 2020 to May 31, 2020 patients were enrolled in the standard group. From 1 March 2021 to 31 May 2021, the pharmaceutical group was enrolled. The clinical pharmacist supported the ED team with patient´s detailed medication history and medication analysis. In both groups, patients were evaluated whether their ED visit was drug-related. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: The number of identified drug-related ED presentations were compared between the two groups. Interventions performed on adverse drug reaction management, causative drugs and patient characteristics were evaluated. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 798 patients were enrolled in the standard group and 827 patients in the pharmaceutical group. Patients whose ED visit was drug-related had a median age of 77 years [(Q25-Q75) 63.5-83.5] and took 7 [(Q25-Q75) 5-8] drugs in standard group. In the pharmaceutical group median age was 78 years [(Q25-Q75) 66-83] and number of drugs taken was 9 [(Q25-Q75) 5.25-11]. 31 (3.9%) drug-related ED visits were identified in the standard group compared to 104 (12.6%) in the pharmaceutical group (OR 3.56; 95% CI 2.35-5.38). An intervention on the patient's pharmacotherapy was performed in 16 drug-related ED visits in standard group compared to 77 in the pharmaceutical group. CONCLUSION: In this study the implementation of a clinical pharmacist was associated with improved identification of drug-related ED visits. Discontinuations of causal medications and dose reductions were significantly higher in the pharmaceutical group compared to the standard care group.

[Adverse drug reactions as cause of nonspecific symptoms in patients in the emergency department]. / Unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen als Ursache unspezifischer Symptome bei Patienten in der zentralen Notaufnahme.

BACKGROUND: In a large proportion of patients admitted to the emergency department (ED), the initial main symptom is nonspecific. One possible reason for this, especially in older patients, may be adverse drug reactions (ADR) due to their frequent polypharmacy. AIM: To illustrate the incidence of ADRs, the affected patient population including risk factors, and drug classes with ADRs leading to nonspecific symptoms. To provide practice recommendations for the management of ADRs in the ED. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Presentation of the pharmacological principles on ADRs, statistics of pharmacovigilance centers as well as original literature including experiences from clinical practice and own projects. RESULTS: In 10% of patients with nonspecific symptoms an ADR is responsible for presentation in the ED. In 60% of cases these ADRs are not correctly identified in the ED setting. A small number of drug classes are responsible for most of these referrals. Databases, risk stratification, clinical pharmacists, or clinical decision support systems are available to improve ADR identification and management. As these options are partly associated with considerable costs or the validation for German EDs is missing, a widespread application does not take place. CONCLUSION: Correct identification of ADRs in patients with nonspecific symptoms in the ED is necessary to initiate adequate treatment. These ADRs are often overlooked because processes and tools for identification and management are not applied in the ED, leading to a lack of awareness. For high-risk patients in the ED, the focus should be on drug history, ideally considering patient-specific risk factors and specific drug classes.

[Scoring tool to identify patients at increased risk for drug-related problems: results of a point prevalence study at hospital admission]. / Scoring-Tool zu Identifizierung von Patienten mit erhöhtem Risiko für Arzneimittel-bezogene Probleme- Bericht einer Punkt-Prävalenzuntersuchung bei Aufnahme im Krankenhaus.

INTRODUCTION: Drug therapy is a high-risk process and requires special attention, especially at sectoral borders. Pharmaceutical services such as medication review are appropriate measures to identify drug-related problems and thus improve the safety of drug therapy. Risk-scoring tools have been described in the literature as helpful for prioritizing medication reviews for patients at high risk for drug-related problems. METHODS: In a multi-centre point prevalence study, we identified patients at increased risk for medication-related problems at hospital admission using the medication risk tool. In addition, the current level of implementation of pharmacy services was surveyed. RESULTS: A total of 11 (58%; 11/19) hospital pharmacies in Saxony participated in the point prevalence survey. The scoring tool identified 32% (279/875) of patients at increased risk for medication-related problems (Meris score >12 group) at admission. Thereby, the number of drugs in the Meris score >12 group was 10.6 (average; standard deviation 3.5; n=279), while in the Meris score ≤12 group it was only five drugs per patient (average 4.6; standard deviation 2.8; n=596). The age of patients in the Meris score >12 group averaged 75.9 ± 11 years, while the age of patients in the Meris score ≤12 group averaged 60.6 ± 17.9 years. DISCUSSION: Prioritization with the help of a risk-scoring tool is essential as pharmacy services in Saxon hospitals still need to be regularly established and in order to identify patients with an increased risk for drug-related problems at an early stage.

Steady-state versus chemotherapy-based hematopoietic cell mobilization after anti-CD38-based induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The incorporation of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in induction regimens of newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been established as a new standard. However, the optimal strategy of stem cell mobilization in this context is not yet clear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From May 2020 till September 2022, we retrospectively reviewed patients receiving anti-CD38 mAb-based induction therapy followed by stem cell mobilization either in a steady-state protocol (SSM) using 10 µg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 5 days or in a chemotherapy-based protocol (CM) using 1-4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. RESULTS: Overall, 85 patients (median age 61 years) were included in the analysis. In total, 90 mobilization attempts were performed, 42 with SSM and 48 with CM. There was no significant difference in the median concentration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB) prior to apheresis between SSM and CM (61/µL vs. 55.4/µL; p = .60). Cumulative CD34+ yields did not differ between the groups with median of 6.68 and 6.75 × 106 /kg body weight, respectively (p = .35). The target yield (≥4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight) was reached in 88% (CM) and 86% (SSM), with a high proportion even after a single apheresis session (76% vs. 75%). Plerixafor was found to be more frequently used in SSM (52%) than in CM (23%; p < .01). A total of 83 patients underwent autologous transplantation and all were engrafted. CONCLUSIONS: Stem cell collection in patients undergoing anti-CD38-based induction therapy is feasible with either CM or SSM, although SSM more frequently requires plerixafor.

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections of Omicron and Delta Variants in Healthcare Workers.

Understanding SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in vaccinated healthcare workers is of key importance in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare facilities. An observational prospective cohort study was conducted in vaccinated employees with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection between October 2021 and February 2022. Serological and molecular testing was performed to determine SARS-CoV-2 viral load, lineage, antibody levels, and neutralizing antibody titers. A total of 571 (9.7%) employees experienced SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections during the enrolment period, of which 81 were included. The majority (n = 79, 97.5%) were symptomatic and most (n = 75, 92.6%) showed Ct values < 30 in RT-PCR assays. Twenty-four (30%) remained PCR-positive for > 15 days. Neutralizing antibody titers were strongest for the wildtype, intermediate for Delta, and lowest for Omicron variants. Omicron infections occurred at higher anti-RBD-IgG serum levels (p = 0.00001) and showed a trend for higher viral loads (p = 0.14, median Ct difference 4.3, 95% CI [-2.5-10.5]). For both variants, viral loads were significantly higher in participants with lower anti-RBD-IgG serum levels (p = 0.02). In conclusion, while the clinical course of infection with both the Omicron and Delta variants was predominantly mild to moderate in our study population, waning immune response over time and prolonged viral shedding were observed.

Assessment of Patients' Views on Drug Benefits and Risks: An Interview Study with Cardiovascular Patients.

Better and balanced information strategies supporting cardiovascular patients' adherence are required. Cardiovascular drugs have outstanding morbidity and mortality benefits. This can be counteracted by patients' perceptions of risks. Drug information should help the patient but not fuel unwarranted fears. We performed a cross-sectional survey of patients admitted to a cardiology ward. We evaluated (i) the patients' general benefit-risk estimation of their pharmacotherapy; (ii) views on benefits; (iii) views on risks; and (iv) information sources. Additionally, we assessed aspects of anxiety and depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). (i) 67 patients (66%) rated expected drug benefits higher than potential risks. (ii) 72% of benefits motivated the patients to take their medication as prescribed. Patients more frequently mentioned surrogate markers as benefits than clinical benefits (p < 0.001). (iii) 56% of risks mentioned were perceived as bothersome and 35% as concerning. Risks were more often perceived as bothersome and concerning by patients with higher PHQ-4 scores (p=0.016). (iv) Physicians were the most frequent information source of benefits (92% of patients) and risks (45%), and pharmacy staff for 27% and 14%, respectively. Laymen or media served as sources of information on benefits in 39%, for risks in 40%, and package leaflets in 26% and 36%. 42% of the patients would like to receive more information on benefits versus 27% on risks. Our results suggest that knowledge of benefits motivates patients to take their drugs as prescribed. There is already good information on surrogate markers for process control with active patient involvement. However, a lack of knowledge still exists in relation to clinical benefits. Regarding risks, it has been shown that patients with higher PHQ-4 scores are more likely to be bothered or concerned. Both emphases on clinical benefits and individualization depending on PHQ-4 scores may be valuable resources for patient counseling to support adherence.

Analysis of stem cell collections in adult patients with Ewing sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Ewing sarcoma is one of the most frequent soft-tissue tumors in pediatric patients. The current treatment protocols recommend stem cell apheresis (SCA) after completion of the second course of induction therapy with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicine, and etoposide (VIDE). The feasibility of SCA and graft compositions in adult patients with Ewing sarcoma have not been previously analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The authors analyzed 29 stem cell collections of 19 adult patients (9 male, 10 female) at a median age of 27 (range 19-53) years mobilized after VIDE (n = 17), cyclophosphamide/topotecan (n = 1) or vincristine, dactinomycin and ifosfamide (n = 1) chemotherapy. All patients were mobilized with filgrastim 5 µg/kg twice daily from day +7 of chemotherapy. The collections were performed if CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood was >10/µL. The target yields were ≥4×106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight. RESULTS: Median CD34+ cells/µL in peripheral blood before SCA were 45.8 (range 6.7-614.4)/µL. The median cumulative yields were 10.6 (range 1.5-38.8) CD34+ cells/kg body weight and ≥2×106 in all but two patients (89%). CD34, CD3, and CD56 yields in collections after the third VIDE and after later courses did not differ. Four patients underwent high-dose therapy with autologous transplantation, and all were engrafted. DISCUSSION: Stem cell mobilization is feasible in most Ewing sarcoma patients. Additionally, the present study's data suggest that it is safe to postpone stem cell collection to a later VIDE chemotherapy cycle if medically indicated.

Stem-cell mobilization of healthy sibling donors with pegfilgrastim-A prospective open-label phase II trial (EudraCT no: 2005-004971-39).

BACKGROUND: Pegfilgrastim is a covalently bound conjugate of filgrastim and mono-methoxypolyethylene glycol with a longer half-life. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We report on phase II prospective monocentric trial examining the feasibility of stem cell mobilization with 12 mg single dose pegfilgrastim in related donors. The objectives were to determine the optimal collection day, defined as CD34+ concentration in peripheral blood (PB) >50 cells/µl, the number of donors collected with single leukapheresis, and the peak level of pegfilgrastim in donor-serum. Furthermore, the cell composition of grafts was assessed and compared to published data. RESULTS: The results included about 28 matched related donors. The median pegfilgrastim serum level remained >200 ng/mL for 48 hours before declining, with the maximal measured concentration of 259.49 ng/ml 24 h after application. The median white blood cell count and CD34 count in PB peaked on day four with 52.6 (range 22.8-85.0) Gpt/l and 66.25 (range 22.9-136.6) cells/µl, respectively. A CD34+ count >50 cells/µl on day four was detected in 75% of donors. 79% of the donors underwent a single collection. Conventional filgrastim was administered additionally in two donors, due to insufficient CD 34+ concentration in PB. 89% of donors showed CD34+ yields ≥4 (median 6.5, range 4.6-14.5) × 10/kg body weight of the recipient. All grafts were administered without rejections. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial showed that stem cell mobilization with pegfilgrastim is a feasible, and attractive option. This is the first trial presenting the kinetics of pegfilgrastim serum levels in healthy donors.

Prognostic impact of rapid reduction of involved free light chains in multiple myeloma patients under first-line treatment with Bendamustine, Prednisone, and Bortezomib (BPV).

INTRODUCTION: Light chain involvement is observed in almost every patient (pt) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Owing to a relatively short half-life, rapid reduction in the involved free light chain (iFLC) is of potential prognostic value. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 92 pts with newly diagnosed MM treated with bendamustine, prednisone, and bortezomib (BPV). RESULTS: After a median number of two (range 1-5) BPV cycles, the majority of pts (n = 86; 93%) responded with either sCR (n = 21), CR (n = 1), nCR (n = 25), VGPR (n = 20), or PR (n = 19). PFS and OS at 48 months were 39% and 67%, respectively. At baseline, 79 out of 92 pts (86%) had iFLC levels above the upper standard level and an abnormal ratio of involved to uninvolved free light chain ≥ 8. In a subgroup analysis of these pts, we evaluated the prognostic importance of an early reduction of the iFLC during the first two BPV cycles. A reduction ≥ 50% of the iFLC on day 8 of the first cycle was observed in 31 of 69 pts. These pts had a significantly better median PFS of 49 months as compared to 20 months in 38 pts with a lower iFLC reduction (p = 0.002). In contrast, OS did not differ significantly with a 48 months survival of 77% vs 69% (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that a rapid decrease in the iFLC on day 8 is an early prognostic marker for newly diagnosed MM pts undergoing BPV treatment.

Case Report: Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Following Induction With CPX-351 in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Is Feasible.

Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) and treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia (tAML) after chemotherapy or radiation therapy for other neoplasms are associated with poor outcomes. CPX-351, a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine, has been shown to improve outcomes in AML-MRC and tAML compared with standard 7+3 regimens. Here we report the cases of four consecutive patients with AML-MRC or tAML who received CPX-351 as outpatient induction therapy immediately followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Two patients received allo-HSCT in remission (one in complete remission and one in partial remission) and two patients received allo-HSCT in aplasia (one at 11 days and one at 52 days after the start of induction therapy with CPX-351). With a median follow-up of 188 days after allo-HSCT, all but one patient are alive and two are in remission. Further studies will help define and expand the role of CPX-351 in the treatment of AML-MRC and tAML, especially in patients expected to undergo allo-HSCT.

Intake of aspirin prior to metamizole does not completely prevent high on treatment platelet reactivity.

PURPOSE: Metamizole can sterically inhibit aspirin (ASA) from binding to cyclooxygenase 1 (COX1). It is recommended that ASA should be taken 30 min prior to metamizole to maintain the irreversible inhibition of arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation. We aimed to analyse the inhibitory effect of ASA and metamizole on AA-induced platelet aggregation over the course of the day. METHODS: We analysed hospitalized patients who ingested ASA at least 30 min prior to metamizole (recommended dosing group, n = 15), metamizole prior or simultaneously with ASA (not recommended dosing group, n = 16) and patients with unknown or mixed intake (mixed dosing group, n = 5). AA-induced light transmission (LTA) and impedance aggregometry (IA) were measured before, 1-2 and 5-6 h after the intake of ASA ± metamizole. RESULTS: Maximum AA-induced LTA prior to the intake of ASA was significantly lower and the rate of high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) higher in the recommended compared with the not recommended dosing group (19.6% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.011 and 4/15 vs. 12/16 patients, p = 0.017). There was no difference when IA was used. Maximum AA-induced LTA after the intake of ASA ± metamizole was lower in patients in the not recommended but not in the recommended dosing group. All patients with HTPR in the recommended dosing group had regular inhibition of AA-induced LTA after discontinuation of metamizole. CONCLUSION: Co-medication of ASA and metamizole significantly influences platelet inhibition with variations during the day and can cause HTPR in patients taking ASA prior to metamizole or simultaneously.

A stability study of amphotericin B, colistin and tobramycin in a hydrophilic suspension commonly used for selective decontamination of the digestive tract by HPLC and in vitro potency measurements.

OBJECTIVES: A suspension for oral use which consists of three non-absorbable antibiotics (amphotericin B, colistin and tobramycin) is often used in clinical practice for the selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) of patients in intensive care. Such a therapy is a preventive tool to minimise the risk of pneumonia and bacteraemia in intubated patients. The administration and the treatment results are controversially discussed. One limiting factor for a unique SDD treatment in the hospitals is a lack of adequate data regarding batch formula and stability for such a formulation. Since no detailed procedures, specifications or stability data are available for manufacturing this formulation there may be discrepancies regarding formulation and stability of suspensions prepared in different pharmacies. The aim of this research was to collect the physicochemical and microbiological stability data of a developed, stable standard formulation under defined storage conditions. The effectiveness of the SDD suspension should be preferably proven over a long period. This would help guarantee that all patients receive the same preparation, therefore, ensuring similar efficacy and improved safety. METHODS: An adequate formulation composed of the registered, marketed medicinal product Ampho-Moronal suspension (Dermapharm AG, Germany) and a buffered, preserved aqueous solution of colistin and tobramycin both as sulfates has been developed. A stability study has been performed on two batches of the formulation. During the storage, samples were taken and compatibility was verified by physicochemical and microbiological testing in stability-indicating terms of colour, odour, flavour, pH, chemical and microbiological purity as well as in vitro potency. The test methods were built and tailored to be suitable, reliable and precise for the test needs. RESULTS: The results show the physicochemical and microbiological stability of the described formulation for defined storage conditions. CONCLUSIONS: A standardised formulation with a proven stability for at least 6 months under fridge (5°C±3°C) conditions for the SDD of patients in intensive care was established.

Purity determination of amphotericin B, colistin sulfate and tobramycin sulfate in a hydrophilic suspension by HPLC.

A suspension comprising of the three antibiotic substances amphotericin B, colistin sulfate and tobramycin sulfate is often used in clinical practice for the selective decontamination of the digestive tract of patients in intensive care. Since no detailed procedures, specifications or stability data are available for manufacturing this suspension, there may be discrepancies regarding formulation and stability of suspensions prepared in different pharmacies. The aim of this work is to develop a standardized formulation and to determine its stability under defined storage conditions. This would help guarantee that all patients receive the same preparation, therefore ensuring similar efficacy and improved safety. The first step in this process is to develop the required analytical tools to measure the content and purity of the drug substances in this complex mixture. In this paper, the development and validation of these tools as well as the development of the drug suspension formulation is described. The formulation comprises of Ampho-Moronal(®)-Suspension (Dermapharm) and a buffered, preservated aqueous solution of colistin sulfate and tobramycin sulfate. Two simple, well established high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods in the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) for impurity profiling of the two active ingredients amphotericin B and colistin sulfate were combined with a newly developed sample extraction procedure for the suspension. Sufficient selectivity and stability-indicating power have been demonstrated. Additionally, a new robust routine method was developed to determine possible degradation products of tobramycin sulfate in the investigated suspension. The specificity, precision, accuracy and linearity of the analytical procedures were demonstrated. The recovery rate was in the range of 90-110%. The precision results for the calculated impurities showed variation coefficients of <10%. The calibration curves were found to be linear with correlation of greater than 0.9994 for all components. The results show the suitability of the methods for the quality control analysis of the suspension.

Bendamustine and prednisone in combination with bortezomib (BPV) in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed/untreated multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has shown important clinical efficacy either as a single agent or in combination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In the present protocol, bortezomib was combined with bendamustine and prednisone, in order to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed/untreated MM. METHODS: Between June 2006 and October 2013, 49 patients with newly diagnosed/untreated MM were treated with bendamustine 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, and prednisone 100 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 8 and 11 bendamustine, prednisone and bortezomib (BPV) once every 21 days. Patients were divided into three groups: group A (n = 19) consisted of patients with normal renal function or mild dysfunction (eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min), group B (n = 15) patients with moderate or severe renal dysfunction (eGFR 15-59 ml/min) and group C (n = 15) patients with renal failure/dialysis (eGFR <15 ml/min). RESULTS: A median number of two (range 1-5) BPV treatment cycles were given to the patients. The majority of the patients (n = 40, 82 %) responded after at least one cycle of BPV therapy with five stringent complete responses (CRs), nine near complete responses, 12 very good partial responses and 14 partial responses. Five patients had MR, three stable and one progressive disease. After a median observation time of 13 months, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 12 months were 92 and 94 %, respectively, for patients with normal renal function or mild renal dysfunction (group A) and 83 and 93 %, respectively, for patients with moderate or severe renal dysfunction (group B). Outcome for these patients was slightly better but not statistically significantly better than that for patients with renal failure/dialysis (group C), who had a PFS, and OS of 66 % (p = 0.08) and 73 % (p = 0.05), respectively. These results indicate that this BPV combination is feasible, effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed MM and normal or impaired renal function.

Bendamustine and prednisone in combination with bortezomib (BPV) in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and light chain-induced renal failure.

INTRODUCTION: Serious renal failure represents a severe complication of multiple myeloma (MM), with an estimated 25-50 % of patients being affected. Both bortezomib and bendamustine have been identified as quickly acting, effective and well-tolerated drugs and might therefore constitute an adequate combination regimen for patients presenting with light chain-induced renal failure. METHODS: Between March 2005 and March 2013, 36 patients with relapsed/refractory MM and light chain-induced renal failure (creatinine clearance <60 ml/min) were treated with bendamustine 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 and prednisone 100 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 8 and 11 (BPV). Patients were divided according to severity of renal impairment into group A (n = 20) with moderate or severe renal dysfunction (eGFR 15-59 ml/min) and group B (n = 16) with renal failure/dialysis (eGFR <15 ml/min). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (67 %) responded with three CR, three nCR, six VGPR and 12 PR. Six patients had minor response, two stable and four progressive disease. With a median follow-up period of 22 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients of group A were 10 and 25 months, respectively. This outcome was significantly better compared to patients of group B with a median PFS and OS of 3 and 7 months, respectively. Eleven patients showed a CRrenal, five a PRrenal and 15 a MRrenal. These results indicate that this BPV combination is feasible, effective and well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory MM and light chain-induced renal failure.

Percutaneous penetration of methyl nicotinate from ointments using the laser Doppler technique: bioequivalence and enhancer effects.

Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) may be used to quantify erythema response as a result of an increased cutaneous microcirculation induced by methyl nicotinate (MN). Bioequivalence of a test and a standard preparation (vehicles: light mineral oil and medium chain triglycerides, respectively) was confirmed according to the pilot study of the FDA Guidance for Industry "Topical dermatologic corticosteroids: In Vivo bioequivalence" applying the staggered application and synchronized removal method for one defined concentration. Furthermore, the influence of penetration enhancers (5% w/w Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and 10% w/w diethylene glycol monoethyl ether) on MN penetration was investigated. It was shown that DMSO and diethylene glycol monoethyl ether altered cutaneous microcirculation and thus MN penetration in comparison to the standard formulation. However, true penetration enhancement could only be proved with diethylene glycol monoethyl ether resulting from an improved drug solubility in the skin which was confirmed by attenuated total reflectance fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). Increased MN penetration by DMSO was only caused by thermodynamic effects, i.e. a decreased drug solubility in the vehicle.

Transfer of the experimental methodology described in the FDA guidance for corticosteroid bioequivalence testing to pharmacodynamic effects caused by nicotinates.

BACKGROUND: The measurement of the pharmacodynamic response allows the noninvasive quantification of cutaneous drug penetration. AIMS: The objective of this study was to investigate whether the experimental methods described in the US Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Industry "Topical Dermatologic Corticosteroids: In vivo Bioequivalence" may be transferred to other response parameters such as skin redness and surface temperature. METHODS: Drug penetration experiments with methyl nicotinate in two different lipophilic vehicles were performed according to the FDA guidance for corticosteroid bioequivalence testing measuring the cutaneous erythema and skin temperature response. RESULTS: The guidance methodology was transferred to the response parameters redness and temperature. Bioequivalence testing was feasible with these response parameters. CONCLUSIONS: An open one-compartment model could only be confirmed for skin redness data by a compartmental analysis of response vs. time profiles. The obtained temperature data can neither be described by an open one-compartment nor by a two-compartment model. A correlation between skin color and skin surface temperature could not be found.