Percutaneous Ablation Versus Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in the Treatment of cT1b Renal Tumors: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of a Propensity Score-weighted Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess oncologic and functional outcomes of both percutaneous ablation (cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the treatment of renal tumors larger than 4 cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 102 consecutive patients, who underwent minimally invasive treatment for cT1b renal tumors at our institution. Primary renal function outcome was assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. Perioperative data and functional and oncologic outcome were collected. Multivariate regression models were used to compare functional outcomes between groups. Cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival were estimated at 2 years using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with Cox proportional hazards regression model to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). To control for selection bias between the different treatments, we adjusted our models with an inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in renal preservation between the groups (P = .664). Multivariate analysis did not show a statistically significant difference in terms of renal function outcomes between the RAPN and percutaneous thermal ablation groups. The adjusted HR regarding the local recurrence-free survival was significantly shorter for the cryoablation group (HR, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-10.37; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated the equivalence between RAPN and percutaneous ablative techniques for the preservation of renal function in the treatment of T1b tumors. RAPN offers a better local control than percutaneous ablation, in terms of primary success rate.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach for retrocaval ureter in children.

PURPOSE: Retrocaval ureter (RCU) is a rare congenital anomaly and published data on pediatric laparoscopic management are poor. The aim of this study was to report our experience of retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach for management of RCU in children. METHODS: A retrospective review of data from patients treated for RCU between 2002 and 2018 in our institution was performed. All patients were positioned in a flank position and underwent a three-port (5-mm optical trocar and two 3-mm trocars) laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureteroureterostomy. Anastomosis was made by 6/0 absorbable sutures. A JJ stent was always inserted. RESULTS: Five patients with a median age of 94 months (5-152) were operated on and followed up for a median time of 103 months (46-201). Median operating time was 200 min (160-270). No conversion and no transfusion occurred. Median hospital stay was 2 days (1-4). Ureteral stent was removed after 52 days (47-82). Complications included pyelonephretis (N = 1). In all cases, hydronephrosis decreased postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach for RCU is safe and effective in children. Our video demonstrates different patients with specific surgical details to show how to manage these children. The global vision of the upper tract by laparoscopy leads to optimal management of these children even if the anomaly was not detected preoperatively.

Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: what does it mean?

ABSTRACT Background Radical prostatectomy (RP) has been used as the main primary treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) for many years with excellent oncologic results. However, approximately 20-40% of those patients has failed to RP and presented biochemical recurrence (BCR). Prostatic specific antigen (PSA) has been the pivotal tool for recurrence diagnosis, but there is no consensus about the best PSA threshold to define BCR until this moment. The natural history of BCR after surgical procedure is highly variable, but it is important to distinguish biochemical and clinical recurrence and to find the correct timing to start multimodal treatment strategy. Also, it is important to understand the role of each clinical and pathological feature of prostate cancer in BCR, progression to metastatic disease and cancer specific mortality (CSM). Review design A simple review was made in Medline for articles written in English language about biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Objective To provide an updated assessment of BCR definition, its meaning, PCa natural history after BCR and the weight of each clinical/pathological feature and risk group classifications in BCR, metastatic disease and CSM.

Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: what does it mean?

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy (RP) has been used as the main primary treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) for many years with excellent oncologic results. However, approximately 20-40% of those patients has failed to RP and presented biochemical recurrence (BCR). Prostatic specific antigen (PSA) has been the pivotal tool for recurrence diagnosis, but there is no consensus about the best PSA threshold to define BCR until this moment. The natural history of BCR after surgical procedure is highly variable, but it is important to distinguish biochemical and clinical recurrence and to find the correct timing to start multimodal treatment strategy. Also, it is important to understand the role of each clinical and pathological feature of prostate cancer in BCR, progression to metastatic disease and cancer specific mortality (CSM). Review design: A simple review was made in Medline for articles written in English language about biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated assessment of BCR definition, its meaning, PCa natural history after BCR and the weight of each clinical/pathological feature and risk group classifications in BCR, metastatic disease and CSM.

The Role of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is stratified into different risk categories based on the patient's prognosis. High-risk disease was formerly characterized by an increased risk of metastasis and lethality, requiring complex treatments. Surgery was recently highlighted to have a pivotal role for the treatment of such cases, even as monotherapy. In the past, open radical prostatectomy was performed for most patients with high-risk PCa; however, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) emerged as a reasonable option because it provided optimal outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk PCa. Robust studies are lacking to properly assess the role of RARP for high-risk PCa. We summarize this knowledge and present a literature review on the perioperative recovery and functional and oncologic outcomes of RARP for the treatment of patients with high-risk PCa.