Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Open Inguinal Hernia Surgery with the Usage of Synthetic Glue-Coated Mesh (Adhesix®).

Chronic groin pain after inguinal hernia mesh repair is a common problem. Mesh fixation without sutures has been suggested to have several advantages over the traditional suture fixation. The aim of this study was to compare two self-adhering meshes, the glued Adhesix® (AH) and the gripping Parietene ProGrip® (PP), and evaluate their impact on postoperative chronic pain and overall recovery. Two consultant surgeons performed altogether 393 open inguinal hernia operations at the Helsinki University Hospital during 2014 to 2015. The two groups, AH (n = 169) and PP (n = 224) were similar and comparable in terms of demographic data. The data were collected and analyzed from the patients' medical records in the hospital's register. The patients were followed up for a period of 19 months (5-31 months). The number of patient contacts due to postoperative pain was significantly less common in the AH group than in the PP group, 4/169 (2.4%) versus 19/224 (8.5%) patients, respectively (P = 0.011). The duration of pain was under three months for most patients, only two patients in the PP group had pain for over one year. The pain was treated most patients with anti-inflammatory painkillers, whereas injections of a local anesthetic and corticosteroid, and chronic pain medication was needed in some cases. It seems that the use of glue-coated mesh (Adhesix®) was associated with less postoperative visits due to pain compared with the self-fixating mesh with absorbable anchoring system (ProGrip®). Further studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these results.

Randomized comparison of the feasibility of three anesthetic techniques for day-case open inguinal hernia repair.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Comparison of local anesthetic infiltration (LAI), spinal anesthesia (SPIN) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for open inguinal herniorrhaphy. We hypothesized that patients receiving LAI could be discharged faster than SPIN and TIVA patients. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective trial. SETTING: University hospital day-surgery center. PATIENTS: 156 adult male patients (ASA 1-3) undergoing day-case open inguinal herniorrhaphy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to either LAI (lidocaine+ropivacaine), SPIN (bupivacaine+fentanyl) or TIVA (propofol+remifentanil). Perioperative Ringer infusion was 1.5mL/h. Urinary bladder was scanned before and after surgery. Interviews were performed on postoperative days 1, 7 and 90. MEASUREMENTS: Duration of surgery, duration of the patients' stay in the operating room and time until their readiness for discharge home. Patient satisfaction and adverse effects were registered. MAIN RESULTS: Surgery lasted longer in LAI group (median 40min) than in SPIN group (35min) (P=.003) and TIVA group (33min) (P<.001). Although surgery was shortest in TIVA group, TIVA patients stayed longer in the operating room than LAI patients (P=.001). Time until readiness for discharge was shorter in LAI group (93min) than in TIVA (147min) and SPIN (190min) groups (P<.001). Supplementary lidocaine infiltration was given to 32 LAI patients, and IV fentanyl to 29 LAI and 4 SPIN patients. Ephedrine was required in 34 TIVA, 5 LAI and 5 SPIN patients. One SPIN and three LAI patients had to be given TIVA and another SPIN patient LAI to complete the operations. Urinary retention was absent. Discomfort in the scar (26%) three months postoperatively was not anesthesia-related. CONCLUSIONS: Logistically, LAI was superior because of the fastest recovery postoperatively. The anesthetic techniques were adequate for surgery in all but a few LAI and SPIN patients. Lack of urinary retention was probably related to the small IV infusion volumes.

A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection as day surgery procedure--1-year outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The long-term outcome between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) with ultrasonic dissection (UsD) technique has not been compared in randomized trials. Therefore, we investigated the outcome after conventional LC and MC with UsD in 78 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0172340). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Initially 88 patients with non-complicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized into MC (n = 44) or LC (n = 44) over a period of 2 years (2010-2012) and 78 of them (89%) were reached for a follow-up interview at 12 months after the surgery. RESULTS: Baseline parameters were similar in the two groups, and 1/44 MCs and 2/44 LCs were converted to open laparotomy. The prevalence of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) one year after the procedure was quite similar in the two groups: 3/36 (8%) in the MC group and 2/42 (5%) in the LC group (p = 0.502). Residual abdominal symptoms were common, but the proportion was similar in both groups (28% in MC and 33% in LC group, p = 0.665). Both groups were very satisfied with the cosmetic outcome (numeric rating scale, p = 0.470). The Quality of life (QoL) improved 34/36 (94%) in the MC group and 33/42 (79%) in the LC group (p = 0.046) and all patients in both groups were satisfied with the operation overall. CONCLUSION: Day-case MC and LC patients have a quite similar one-year outcome with no significant difference regarding residual abdominal symptoms, cosmetic satisfaction, QoL or CPSP.

Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Cholecystectomy by minilaparotomy (MC) or by laparoscopy (LC) has been shown to have equal results of both early and late recovery. Although, the ultrasonic dissection (UsD) technique has seen used in LC, the technique is rarely used in MC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Initially, 88 patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones were randomized into MC with UsD (n = 44) or conventional LC (n = 44) over a 2-year period (2010-2012). The two groups were similar in terms of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score. Results. Both groups were similar in terms of the operative time and the time in the operation theatre, the success of day-surgery and satisfaction with the procedure. The MC group had significantly less postoperative pain than the LC group, p = 0.002, and the MC group used less analgesics doses during the first 24 h: 2.8 (1.2) doses vs. 3.8 (1.4) doses, p = 0.003. The convalescence needed was 3 days shorter in the MC group, 7 (3) days, than that in the LC-group, 10 (8) days, p = 0.024. In the MC group 4 patients and in the LC group 11 (p = 0.046) required more than 14 days of sick leave. In the MC group there was one and in the LC group two conversions to open surgery. CONCLUSION: The patients in the MC group had less early postoperative pain and had a shorter convalescence than the patients in the LC group.