Trends in Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: 2016 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: In 2011, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons released a consensus recommending venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to examine (1) incidences of postoperative complications, including pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and transfusion rates; (2) trends from 2016 to 2021 in VTE prophylaxis; and (3) independent risk factors for 90-day total complications following TKA between aspirin, enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. METHODS: Using a national, all-payer database from 2016 to 2021, we identified all patients who underwent primary TKA. Exclusions included all patients who had prescribed anticoagulants within 1 year prior to TKA, hypercoagulable states, and cancer. Data were collected on baseline demographics, including age, sex, diabetes, and a comorbidity index, in each of the VTE prophylaxis cohorts. Postoperative outcomes included rates of PE, DVT, and transfusion. Multivariable regressions were performed to determine independent risk factors for total complications at 90 days following TKA. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2021, aspirin was the most used anticoagulant (n = 62,054), followed by rivaroxaban (n = 26,426), enoxaparin (n = 20,980), and warfarin (n = 13,305). The cohort using warfarin had the highest incidences of PE (1.8%) and DVT (5.7%), while the cohort using aspirin had the lowest incidences of PE (0.6%) and DVT (1.6%). The rates of aspirin use increased the most from 2016 to 2021 (32.1% to 70.8%), while the rates of warfarin decreased the most (19.3% to 3.0%). Enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and warfarin were independent risk factors for total complications at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: An epidemiological analysis of VTE prophylaxis use from 2016 to 2021 shows an increase in aspirin following TKA compared to other anticoagulant cohorts in a nationally representative population. This approach provides more insight and a better understanding of anticoagulation trends over this time period in a nationally representative sample.

Open versus arthroscopic treatment of the rheumatoid elbow arthritis: a comparison of complications at two years utilizing a nationally representative database.

PURPOSE: Symptomatic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be addressed surgically with open procedures or elbow arthroscopy. Previous studies comparing outcomes of open to arthroscopic arthrolysis for the management of RA did not utilize a large database study. The aim was to compare demographics and two-year complications, in RA patients undergoing open or arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study was performed utilizing a private, nationwide, all-payer database. We queried the database to identify patients undergoing open (n = 578) or arthroscopic (n = 379) arthrolysis for elbow RA. The primary goal of the study was to compare complications at two-years. Categorical variables were assessed utilizing the chi-squared test; while, continuous variables were analyzed using the Student's t-test. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors for infection following open or arthroscopic arthrolysis. RESULTS: RA patients undergoing open elbow arthrolysis were older (55 vs. 49 years, p < 0.001), predominately female (61.6% vs 60.9%, p = 0.895), and likely to have chronic kidney disease (20.4 vs. 12.9%), and DM (45.2 vs. 32.2%) (both p < 0.005). Open elbow arthrolysis was also associated with higher rates of infection (31.7 vs. 4.7%) and wound complications (26.8 vs. 3.4%) (both p = 0.001). Nerve injury rates were found to be similar (8.3 vs. 9.0%, p = 0.81). On multivariable logistic regression, open elbow procedures were associated with the highest risk for infection (OR: 8.43). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing open arthrolysis for RA were at a higher risk of infection and wound complications compared to arthroscopic arthrolysis utilizing a nationally representative database. While there appears to be a difference in outcomes following these two procedures, higher level evidence is needed to draw more definitive conclusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective, Level III.

An anatomic study of the morphologic characteristics of the dorsal capitolunate ligament.

PURPOSE: There is consensus in favor of a description of the dorsal ligaments of the carpus as not including a direct ligament between the lunate and capitate. On the other hand, there is an anatomical formation which, according to the currently accepted description, corresponds to the dorsal midcarpal capsule, itself thickened by the dorsal intercarpal ligament. The question is whether the capsule at this point deserves to be called an individualizable ligament. In our operative experience of the dorsal carpus, we have encountered a stout structure adherent to the lunate and capitate. In this article, we present the anatomic evidence of this structure's existence. METHODS: Seven adult fresh frozen upper extremities were dissected. Three wrists were longitudinally sectioned in line with the middle finger metacarpal. The remaining 4 were dissected dorsally. Two representative samples of the stout structure connecting the lunate to the capitate were sent to pathology for histologic analysis and staining. RESULTS: In all 3 of the longitudinally sectioned wrists, a thick band of tissue could clearly be seen, originating on the lunate, spanning the dorsal interval between the lunate and the capitate, and inserting on the capitate. With this structure intact, dorsal dislocation of the capitate was not possible, but preliminary sectioning of the structure allowed dislocation. In the 4 dorsally dissected wrists, the same connection was observed, palmar to the dorsal intercarpal ligament, in every specimen. The average dimensions of the dorsal capitolunate were: 15.25 ± 1 mm long, 8.75 ± 1 mm wide at the midpoint, and 1.75 ± 1 mm thick. The two specimens sent to pathology after sectioning showed longitudinally oriented collagen fibers. This structure also stained positive for elastin and contained intrasubstance vascular structures. CONCLUSION: There is a stout ligamentous structure connecting the lunate to the capitate, palmar to the dorsal intercarpal ligament. Disruption of this structure appears to be necessary for dorsal dislocation of the capitate. Clinical studies are needed to gain better understanding of the exact function and importance of this structure.

Treatment of 2-part, 3-part, and 4-part proximal humerus fractures from 2016 to 2020: A nationally-representative database.

Introduction: Complex proximal humerus fractures pose challenges in elderly patients, as this common scenario can lead to unpredictable outcomes, regardless of treatment method. Given the evolving nature of the treatment for 3-and-4-part proximal humerus fractures, an epidemiological analysis offers a way to minimize the gap between appropriate understanding and effective intervention. As such, we aimed to i) evaluate the trends of nonoperative and operative management; and ii) compare the complication rates of ORIF to conversion ORIF (to RTSA). Methods: We utilized a national, all-payer database to include patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for 2-part (n = 2783), 3-part (n = 2170), 4-part (n = 1087) proximal humerus fractures between April 2016 to December 2022. Patients who failed ORIF to RTSA included n = 108 for 2-part fractures, n = 123 for 3-part fractures, and n = 128 for 4-part fractures. We collected demographic and postoperative medical and surgical complications at 90-days, in addition to time-interval between ORIF and RTSA. Results: The malunion and nonunion rates for ORIF between different types of proximal humerus fractures were similar (2-part fractures: 1.8 %, 4.7 %; 3-part fractures: 1.8 %, 3.5 %; 4-part fractures: 2.4 %, 3.7 %). The conversion rates of failed ORIF to RTSA were 1.9 %, 2.8 %, and 5.9 % for 2-part, 3-part, and 4-part fractures, respectively. The time interval from failed ORIF to RTSA was 190 days for 2-part fractures, 169 days for 3-part fractures, and 129 for 4-part fractures. Conclusion: An epidemiological analysis of proximal humerus fractures by fracture type demonstrated an increase in RTSA for 2-part, 3-part, and 4-part fractures while nonoperative treatment showed no change from 2016 to 2020. Additional research is needed to determine which fractures are best treated operatively while maximizing outcomes. In the setting of complex proximal humerus fractures, several options seem feasible depending on patient demographic characteristics.

Elevated risk of prosthetic infections in cannabis users after shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of states are beginning to legalize recreational cannabis use, and as such, more patients using cannabis are undergoing shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The present study sought to examine the impact of cannabis use on post-operative outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were postoperative complications, which included infection, periprosthetic fractures, periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), dislocations, and aseptic loosening as well as medical complications. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for PJI and aseptic loosening at two-years. METHODS: A private, nationwide, all-payer database (Pearldiver Technologies) was queried to identify shoulder arthroplasty patients from 2010 to 2020. Those not using tobacco or cannabis ("control", n = 10,000), tobacco users (n = 10,000), cannabis users (n = 155), and concurrent tobacco and cannabis users (n = 9,842) were identified. Risk factors for PJI and aseptic loosening at two-years were further quantified utilizing multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared to non-users, cannabis users experienced the highest odds for PJI and aseptic revisions, which were followed by concurrent cannabis and tobacco users and tobacco-only users. Concurrent users, as well as tobacco users were at higher risk for dislocation. Cannabis use was the most significant risk factor for PJI, followed by concurrent use and male sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found cannabis use to cause greater risk for superficial and deep infection. More research involving randomized trials are needed to fully elucidate the impact of cannabis use on shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Clinically, these findings can appropriately guide surgeons and patients alike regarding expectations prior to undergoing TSA.

Spinal fusion and total hip arthroplasty: why timing is important.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing debate among orthopaedic surgeons over the temporal relationship between lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with hip-spine syndrome. Few large studies have directly compared the results of patients who undergo LSF prior to THA (LSF-THA) to those who undergo LSF after THA (THA-LSF). The current study matched THA patients with a prior LSF to patients who underwent LSF after THA to assess: 90-day and 1-year (1) medical/surgical complications; and (2) revisions. METHODS: We queried a national, all-payer database to identify all patients undergoing THA between 2010 and 2018 (n = 716,084). The LSF-THA patients and THA-LSF patients were then matched 1:1 on age, sex, Charleson Comorbidity Index, and obesity. Medical/surgical complications and revisions at 90 days and 1 year were recorded. Categorical and continuous variables were analysed utilising t-tests and chi-square, respectively. RESULTS: LSF-THA patients experienced significantly more postoperative dislocations at 90 days and 1 year compared to THA-LSF patients (p = 0.048 and p < 0.001). There were a similar number of revisions performed for LSF-THA and THA-LSF patients at both 90 days and 1 year (p = 0.183 and p = 0.426). Furthermore, at 1 year, LSF-THA patients experienced more pneumonia (p = 0.005) and joint infection (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Prior LSF has been demonstrated to increase the risk of postoperative dislocation in patients undergoing THA. The results of the present study demonstrate increased dislocations with LSF-THA compared to THA-LSF. For "hip spine syndrome" patients requiring both LSF and THA, it may be more beneficial to undergo THA prior to LSF. Arthroplasty surgeons may wish to collaborate with spinal surgeons to ensure optimal outcomes for this group of patients.

C. Difficile Infection within 6 Months before TKA Is Associated with Increased Short-Term Complications.

A history of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be a marker for poor patient health and could be used to identify patients with higher risks for complications after TKA. We compared the frequency of 90-day postoperative CDI, complications, readmissions, and associated risk factors in (1) patients experiencing CDIs more than 6 months before TKA, (2) patients experiencing CDIs in the 6 months before TKA, and (3) patients without a history of CDI. We identified patients who underwent primary TKAs from 2010 to 2019 and had a history of CDI before TKA (n = 7,195) using a national, all-payer database. Patients were stratified into two groups: those with CDIs > 6 months before TKA (n = 6,027) and those experiencing CDIs ≤ 6 months before TKA (n = 1,168). These patients were compared with the remaining 1.4 million patients without a history of CDI before TKA. Chi-square and unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare complication frequencies. Prior CDI during either timespan was associated with higher unadjusted odds for postoperative CDI (CDI > 6 months before TKA: OR 8.03 [95% CI 6.68-9.63]; p < 0.001; CDI ≤ 6 months before TKA: OR 59.05 [95% CI 49.66-70.21]; p < 0.001). Patients with a history of CDI before TKA were associated with higher unadjusted odds for 90-day complications and readmission compared with patients without a history of CDI before TKA. Other comorbidities and health metrics were not found to be associated with postoperative CDI (i.e., age, obesity, smoking, antibiotic use, etc.). CONCLUSION: CDI before TKA was associated with higher odds of postoperative CDI compared with patients without a history of CDI. CDI ≤ 6 months before TKA was associated with the highest odds for postoperative complications and readmissions. Providers should consider delaying TKA after CDI, if possible, to allow for patient recovery and eradication of infection.

Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections Within 4 Weeks of Arthroscopic Shoulder Procedures Are Associated With Increased Postoperative Infection Rates.

PURPOSE: To refine the understanding of the effect of timing of corticosteroid injections (CSIs) and shoulder arthroscopy on postoperative infection. METHODS: An insurance database was used to determine all patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for a 5-year period with an associated preoperative ipsilateral corticosteroid injection. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on timing of preoperative CSI: (1) 0-<2 weeks, (2) 2-<4 weeks, (3) 4-<6 weeks, and (4) 6-<8 weeks. Patients were pooled to include all patients who had a CSI less than 4 weeks and those longer than 4 weeks. A cohort of patients who never had a corticosteroid injection before undergoing arthroscopy were used as a control. All patients had a follow-up of 2 years. Multivariable regression analyses were performed using R Studio with significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression showed a greater odds ratio (OR) for postoperative infection in patients who received CSI 0-<2 weeks before shoulder arthroscopy at 90 days (3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-5.57, P < .001), 1 year (2.51, 95% CI 1.46-4.12, P < .001), and 2 years (2.08, 95% CI 1.27-3.28, P = .002) compared with the control group. Patients who received CSI 2-<4 weeks before shoulder arthroscopy had greater OR for infection at 90 days (2.26, 95% CI 1.28-3.83, P = .03), 1 year (1.82, 95% CI 1.13-2,82, P = .01), and 2 years (1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.47, P = .012). Patients who received CSI after 4 weeks had similar ORs of infection at 90 days (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.78-1.69, P = .48) 1 year (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.85-1.63 P = .33), and 2 years (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83-1.42, P = .54), compared with the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows the postoperative infection risk is greatest when CSIs are given within 2 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy, whereas CSIs given within 2-<4 weeks also portend increased risk, albeit to a lesser degree. The risk of postoperative infection is not significantly increased when CSIs are given more than 1 month before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative, prognosis study.

Comparative analysis of open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release in a comprehensive national database.

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common compressive neuropathy. There is limited evidence to support endoscopic compared to open carpal tunnel release according to the 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline on carpal tunnel syndrome. The purpose of the present study was to assess differences between the two procedures by comparing 30- and 90-day complications and mean hospital costs in a large patient population. METHODS: Using the national Mariner15 Database by PearlDiver Technologies, we retrospectively studied 27,192 carpal tunnel syndrome patients who received carpal tunnel release using an endoscopic or open surgical approach from 2010 to 2019. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were grouped and case-matched at a 1:1 ratio through the corresponding International Classification of Diseases codes (n = 13,596) and assessed for 30- and 90-day complications such as median nerve injury, superficial palmar arch injury, and revision carpal tunnel release surgery. Univariate analysis was used to compare outcomes and a multivariate regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with each outcome. RESULTS: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release was associated with a higher rate of median nerve injury than open release at 30 days (0.3% vs. 0.1% odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.81; p < 0.05) and 90 days (0.4% vs. 0.3%; odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-2.70; p < 0.05). Endoscopic release was also associated with a higher rate of superficial palmar arch injury (0.1% vs. 0%; odds ratio, 25.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-423.0; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, risk of median nerve injury and vascular injury was higher after endoscopic than open carpal tunnel release. At 90 days, all-cause revision rates were similar between techniques. Surgeons should understand these differences, to optimize surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IIIa.

Curtailing infection risks in hepatitis C patients: the effect of antiviral treatment in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Revision shoulder arthroplasty (RevSA) is a complex procedure that can result in various postoperative complications. However, the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) on postoperative complications after RevSA remains unclear because of limited and inconsistent evidence. This study aims (1) to investigate the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with HCV undergoing RevSA and (2) to evaluate the impact of HCV treatment on complication rates at different time points after the revision procedure, specifically at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years. METHODS: We queried a national, all-payer database to investigate recent trends in the use of RevSA among HCV patients to assess postoperative complication rates, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), wound complication, transfusion, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Statistical analyses involved propensity score matching to create balanced cohorts and logistic regression to determine the relative risk of postoperative complications. Data were analyzed with SPSS software (version 24.0 for Windows). The study included patients who underwent partial or total RevSA procedures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Patients were identified based on medical claims that included procedural codes for RevSA and associated diagnosis codes for PJI or insertion/removal of an antibiotic spacer. A Bonferroni correction was used because many tests were performed and statistical significance was set at P = .0125. RESULTS: The HCV cohort demonstrated higher PJI rates at 1-year (5.5% vs. 3.9%, P = .006) and 2-year follow-ups (6.7% vs. 4.6%, P = .006). However, no significant differences emerged in VTE and wound complication rates between the HCV and non-HCV cohorts. Comparing untreated and treated HCV patients, the former showed significantly higher PJI rates at 2 years (P = .010), whereas the treated group had significantly lower odds ratios for PJI. When comparing treated HCV patients with the non-HCV cohort, minimal differences were found in postoperative outcomes, indicating no significant difference in the risk of complications between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our study observed an association between HCV patients who received antiviral treatment prior to RevSA and a reduced incidence of PJI compared to untreated HCV patients. When comparing this group to the non-HCV controls, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PJI, suggesting a potential association between antiviral treatment and the observed risk patterns in HCV patients. Proper management of HCV-positive patients during RevSA is crucial for improving outcomes and reducing complications.

Cannabis Use in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures: A Moment of Unity?

BACKGROUND: As legalization of cannabis spreads, an increasing number of patients who use cannabis are being seen in the clinical setting. This study examined the impact of cannabis and tobacco use on postoperative complications following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures. METHODS: A national, all-payer database was queried to identify patients who underwent ORIF of a distal radius fracture between 2015 and 2020 (n = 970 747). Patients were stratified into the following groups: (1) tobacco use (n = 86 941), (2) cannabis use (n = 898), (3) tobacco and cannabis use (n = 9842), and (4) neither tobacco nor cannabis use ("control", 747 892). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for infection, nonunion, and malunion within the first postoperative year. RESULTS: Concomitant use of tobacco and cannabis was associated with a higher rate of nonunion (5.0%) compared to tobacco or cannabis use alone (P < .001). Multivariate analysis identified cannabis-only use (odds ratio [OR] 1.25), tobacco-only use (OR 2.17), and concurrent tobacco and cannabis use (OR 1.78) as risk factors for infection within the first postoperative year. Similarly, cannabis-only use (OR 1.47), tobacco-only use (OR 1.92), and concurrent tobacco and cannabis use (OR 2.52) were associated with an increased risk of malunion. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis use is associated with an elevated risk of infection and malunion following operative management of a distal radius fracture. Concomitant use of cannabis and tobacco poses an elevated risk of nonunion and malunion compared to tobacco use alone.

Open versus arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis for primary osteoarthritis: A comparison of demographics and complications at two years.

Introduction: Open techniques have traditionally been utilized in the surgical management of elbow osteoarthritis (OA). However, advances in elbow arthroscopy, in conjunction with the movement towards minimally invasive surgery, have led to an increase in the utilization of an arthroscopic approach. The primary aim of this investigation was to compare demographics and complication rates between patients undergoing open or arthroscopic arthrolysis for elbow OA with a secondary objective of identifying risk factors for infection with each treatment. Methods: A retrospective review of a private, all-payer database was performed to identify patients undergoing either open (n = 1482) or arthroscopic (n = 2341) arthrolysis for elbow osteoarthritis. The primary outcome was 2-year complications, which included infection, wound complications, and nerve injuries. Categorical variables were compared utilizing chi-square analyses, while continuous variables were compared using independent sample t-tests. Odd ratios (OR) were ascertained to quantify the risk attributed to open arthrolysis compared to arthroscopic. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors for infection following open or arthroscopic arthrolysis of an elbow with OA. Results: Age was significantly higher in the open cohort (55 ± 13.4 years) compared to the arthroscopic cohort (52 ± 13.1 years) (p < 0.001). The open cohort was more likely to be female (32.0 vs. 22.9%, p < 0.001) and have a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) greater than three (9.2 vs. 7.1%, p < 0.001). Open procedures were associated with an increased risk of nerve injury (OR: 1.50) and wound complications (OR: 7.70) compared to arthroscopic arthrolysis. Multivariable logistic regression identified open procedures as a risk factor for infection (OR: 11.15). Moreover, diabetes (OR: 1.48), chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.89) and tobacco use (OR: 2.29) were found as risk factors for infection among the open cohort. Conclusions: This study found patients undergoing open arthrolysis of OA to be older and have a greater number of medical comorbidities compared to those undergoing arthroscopic arthrolysis. Open arthrolysis was associated with an increased rate of infection, nerve injury and wound complications compared to arthroscopic arthrolysis. After controlling for age and comorbidities with multivariable logistic regression, open arthrolysis remained a risk factor for infection. Arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis is associated with a lower risk of complications, including infection and may be favored for the management of OA of the elbow. Level of Evidence: III (retrospective cohort study).

The temporal effect of corticosteroid injections into large joints prior to trigger finger release on infection.

BACKGROUND: Trigger finger may be treated with open surgical release. Local corticosteroid injections have also demonstrated success. Studies suggest recipients of flexor sheath corticosteroid up to 90-days prior to open surgery are at increased risk of post-operative infection. However, the possible link between large joints corticosteroid prior to trigger finger release remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to provide complication risks for trigger finger release recipients after large joint corticosteroid. METHODS: We reviewed a national, all-payer database and examined patients who did not receive and did receive corticosteroid two, four, or six weeks prior to trigger finger release. Primary outcomes assessed were 90-day risk for antibiotics, infection, and irrigations and debridement. Multivariate logistic analyses compared cohorts using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: No trends were found regarding antibiotic requirements, infection, as well irrigations and debridement within 90-days for recipients of corticosteroid into large joints two, four, or six weeks prior to open trigger finger release. Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco use were identified as independent risks for requiring antibiotics as well as irrigations and debridement (all Odds Ratios > 1.06, all p ≤ 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent trigger finger release after receiving a corticosteroid into a large joint two, four, or six weeks prior has no association with 90-day antibiotics, infection, or irrigations and debridement. While the comfort levels for individual surgeons vary, optimizing these comorbidities prior to surgery is an important goal discussed with patients to lower risks for infections. RETROSPECTIVE: Level III.

Does timing matter? The effect of preoperative smoking cessation on the risk of infection or revision following rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Nicotine in tobacco products is known to impair bone and tendon healing, and smoking has been associated with an increased rate of retear and reoperation following rotator cuff repair (RCR). Although smoking is known to increase the risk of failure following RCR, former smoking status and the timing of preoperative smoking cessation have not previously been investigated. METHODS: A national all-payer database was queried for patients undergoing RCR between 2010 and 2020. Patients were stratified into 5 mutually exclusive groups according to smoking history: (1) never smokers (n = 50,000), (2) current smokers (n = 28,291), (3) former smokers with smoking cessation 3-6 months preoperatively (n = 34,513), (4) former smokers with smoking cessation 6-12 months preoperatively (n = 786), and (5) former smokers with smoking cessation >12 months preoperatively (n = 1399). The risks of postoperative infection and revision surgery were assessed at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years following surgery. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to isolate and evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications. RESULTS: The 90-day rate of infection following RCR was 0.28% in never smokers compared with 0.51% in current smokers and 0.52% in former smokers who quit smoking 3-6 months prior to surgery (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression identified smoking (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; P < .001) and smoking cessation 3-6 months prior to surgery (OR, 1.56; P < .001) as risk factors for 90-day infection. The elevated risk in these groups persisted at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. However, smoking cessation >6 months prior to surgery was not associated with a significant elevation in infection risk. In addition, smoking was associated with an elevated 90-day revision risk (OR, 1.22; P = .038), as was smoking cessation between 3 and 6 months prior to surgery (OR, 1.19; P = .048). The elevated risk in these groups persisted at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Smoking cessation >6 months prior to surgery was not associated with a statistically significant elevation in revision risk. CONCLUSION: Current smokers and former smokers who quit smoking within 6 months of RCR are at an elevated risk of postoperative infection and revision surgery at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively compared with never smokers. Former smokers who quit >6 months prior to RCR are not at a detectably elevated risk of infection or revision surgery compared with those who have never smoked.

Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with increased complications after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Few studies investigate the influence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, we compared complications and readmissions frequencies after TKA in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) to patients without IBD. METHODS: A large administrative claims database was used to identify patients who underwent primary TKAs from 2010 to 2019 and had a diagnosis of IBD before TKA. Patients were stratified into two groups: those with CD (n = 8,369) and those with UC (n = 11,347). These patients were compared a control of 1.3 million patients without an IBD diagnosis. Chi-square and unadjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare complication frequencies. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate independent risk factors for 90-day complications. RESULTS: Compared to patients without IBD, patients with IBD were associated with higher unadjusted 90-day odds for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) (CD: OR 2.81 [95% CI 2.17 to 3.63]; p < 0.001; UC: OR 3.01 [95% CI 2.43 to 3.72]; p < 0.001) and two-year periprosthetic joint infection (CD: OR 1.34 [95% CI 1.18 to 1.52]; p < 0.001; UC: OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.13 to 1.41]; p < 0.001). After controlling for risk factors like obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes, both types of IBD were associated with higher 90-day odds for CDI and PJI (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: IBD is associated with higher 90-day postoperative CDI and PJI compared with patients without IBD. Providers should consider discussing these risks with patients who have a diagnosis of IBD.

Primary total hip arthroplasty complications and costs in liver transplant recipients: a matched analysis using a national database.

BACKGROUND: The number of liver transplant recipients (LTR) is worldwide increasing and, as the survival is improving as well, there is an increasing number of patients needing total hip arthroplasty (THA). There might be increased risks for this specific group of patients and due to their comorbidities costs might be higher too. Using a big national database outcome and cost of THA should be compared between liver transplant recipients and the general population. METHODS: The study was performed using a collection of Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance claims. Length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, complications rates up to 5 years, and 90-day total cost of care between liver transplant recipients and matched non-transplant patients should be compared. All primary THAs from 2010 to 2019 were identified. 513 patients with a liver transplant before their THA were matched to 10,759 patients without a history of solid organ transplant at a 1:20 ratio based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, obesity, and diabetes status. RESULTS: LTR had a longer average LOS (4.2 vs. 3.4 days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the thirty-day readmissions (5.7% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.117) and 90-day dislocation rates (2.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.600). Total costs in the first ninety days after THA were not different between the LTR and controls (p = 0.756). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that complications and costs are no major point of concern in patients with liver transplant that are operated with THA.

Sequentially Irradiated and Annealed Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty at 10-Year Follow-up.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has become the preferred bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty. However, its acceptance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been as robust because of concerns pertaining to wear and its impact on implant failure. Therefore, this multicenter study was purposed to evaluate the 10-year (1) radiographic outcomes; (2) complications; and (3) implant survivorship in patients with TKA receiving a sequentially irradiated and annealed HXLPE. A retrospective, multi-center study was performed on 139 patients (171 TKAs) who underwent primary TKA with HXLPE and possessed a minimum of 10-year follow-up. Radiographs were analyzed for radiolucencies along the implant-fixation interface using the Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System. Kaplan-Meier analysis determined implant survivorship when the end points were revision for polyethylene wear and polyethylene revision for any reason. Sixteen TKAs (9.9%) demonstrated periprosthetic linear radio-lucencies. Seventeen TKAs (9.9%) required additional surgeries, 9 (5.3%) of which were revisions, with 1 (0.6%) TKA requiring revision because of polyethylene wear. Other causes of revision included instability (1.8%), infection (1.6%), and arthrofibrosis (1.6%). The mean time to revision was 5.9 years (range, 0.1-11.1 years). Survivorship pertaining to polyethylene revision for wear was 99.4%, whereas all-cause polyethylene revision was 94.7%. This study in patients undergoing primary TKA using a second-generation HXLPE demonstrated excellent results with respect to polyethylene wear characteristics and strength with a 99.4% survivorship at 10 years. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):e111-e117.].

Does needle penetration of the shoulder joint prior to arthroscopy increase infection risk? The effect of preoperative magnetic resonance arthrogram or corticosteroid injection.

BACKGROUND: Prior literature has associated preoperative corticosteroid shoulder injection (CSI) with infection following shoulder surgery. A recent study found an equally elevated risk of total knee arthroplasty infection with preoperative injection of either CSI or hyaluronic acid. The implication is that violation of a joint prior to surgery, even in the absence of corticosteroid, may pose an elevated risk of infection following orthopedic surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine whether violation of the shoulder joint for magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) poses an elevated risk of infection following shoulder arthroscopy, and to compare this risk to that introduced by preoperative CSI. METHODS: A national, all-payer database was queried to identify patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy between January 2015 and October 2020. Patients were stratified into the following groups: (1) no CSI or MRA within 6 months of surgery (n = 5000), (2) CSI within 2 weeks of surgery (n = 1055), (3) CSI between 2 and 4 weeks prior to surgery (n = 2575), (4) MRA within 2 weeks of surgery (n = 414), and (5) MRA between 2 and 4 weeks prior to surgery (n = 1138). Postoperative infection (septic shoulder or surgical site infection) was analyzed at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years, postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlled for differences among groups. RESULTS: MRA within 2 weeks prior to shoulder surgery was associated with an increased risk of infection at 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; P = .007), while MRA 2-4 weeks preceding surgery was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at any time point. By comparison, CSI within 2 weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90 days (OR, 1.72; P = .022), 1 year (OR, 1.65; P = .005), and 2 years (OR, 1.63; P = .002) following surgery. Similarly, CSI 2-4 weeks prior to surgery was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection at 90 days (OR, 1.83; P < .001), 1 year (OR, 1.62; P < .001), and 2 years (OR, 1.79; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative CSI within 4 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy elevates the risk of postoperative infection. Needle arthrotomy for shoulder MRA elevates the risk of infection in a more limited fashion. Avoidance of MRA within 2 weeks of shoulder arthroscopy may mitigate postoperative infection risk. Additionally, the association between preoperative CSI and postoperative infection may be more attributed to medication profile than to needle arthrotomy.

Phenotypic Frailty Score Predicts Perioperative Outcomes for Geriatric Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Various assessment tools are often used to predict perioperative morbidity among patients older than 75 years who undergo total joint arthroplasty. Yet, few studies describe the use of phenotypic frailty as a predictor for outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess phenotypic frailty with the Sinai Abbreviated Geriatric Evaluation (SAGE) and compare its utility with established assessment tools used in practice. We specifically asked: (1) Can SAGE predict 30-day outcomes, including postoperative delirium? (2) Can SAGE determine the risk of prolonged hospital length of stay? (3) Is SAGE predictive for 30-day readmissions? (4) Can SAGE determine the risk of discharge to a specialized facility? Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty were evaluated with the American Association of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), 5-point Modified Frailty Score (5-FS), and SAGE. Assessment scores were determined for each patient, and every incremental change in score was used to predict the likelihood of perioperative complications. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was also performed to calculate testing sensitivity for each assessment tool. The SAGE scores were more likely to predict 30-day complications (odds ratio [95 CI], 2.21 [1.32-3.70]), postoperative delirium (6.40 [1.78-23.03]), and length of stay greater than 2 days (3.90 [1.00-15.7]) compared with ASA, CCI, and 5-FS values. The SAGE scores were not predictive of readmission (1.77 [0.66-4.72]) or discharge to a specialized facility (1.48 [0.80-2.75]). The SAGE score was a more sensitive predictor (area under the curve, 0.700) for perioperative morbidity compared with ASA (0.638), CCI (0.662), and 5-FS (0.644) values. Therefore, SAGE scores can reliably assess risk of perioperative morbidity and may have better clinical utility than ASA, CCI, and 5-FS values for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):e315-e320.].