Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Urology ; 65(5): 959-63, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15882731

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the training approach that a laparoscopy-naive general urologist working in a nonteaching hospital used to successfully learn to perform laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and describe the results obtained in the first 114 cases performed. METHODS: The urologist assisted an experienced laparoscopic surgeon for 20 extraperitoneal radical prostatectomies. During this time, he modified his technique of performing open radical retropubic prostatectomy to facilitate the acquisition of the laparoscopic techniques. Intracorporeal suturing was learned with the aid of a pelvic trainer. The clinical records of the first consecutive 114 cases were examined to evaluate the outcomes in terms of morbidity and oncological and functional concerns. A similar analysis was performed on a subgroup of 15 patients who had undergone laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate. RESULTS: The operating time progressively decreased during the learning curve. The mean duration of surgery was 160 minutes. Two conversions to open surgery were required owing to failure to progress. Of the 114 patients, 14% experienced complications, most of which were minor. The positive surgical margin rate was 17%. The average follow-up was 16 months. Undetectable serum prostate-specific antigen levels were observed in 82%, 87%, and 79% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively; 96% of patients used 0 to 1 pad per day for incontinence at 6 months of follow-up. The results in the transurethral resection subgroup were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy can be successfully learned by a general urologist with no prior laparoscopic experience.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Continuing , Laparoscopy , Prostatectomy/education , Urology/education , Adult , Aged , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Learning , Lymph Node Excision , Male , Prostatectomy/adverse effects
2.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 68(5): 289-91, 1996 Dec.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9026228

ABSTRACT

A comparative study between modified Camey II and Studer ileal orthotopic neobladder was performed. The Camey II was modified as follows: 1) The ureters were implanted, using wallace technique, in an undetubularized ileal loop, 15-18 cm. long, to prevent vesico-ureteral reflux; 2) The neobladder was made using staplers. In such a way, time is saved (about one hour) and results are quite similar, with a low rate of ureteral stenosis in both groups.


Subject(s)
Cystectomy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Diversion/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Surgical Staplers , Time Factors
3.
Arch Esp Urol ; 48(10): 1060-1, 1995 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8588729

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Redefine the meaning of the old term "giant adenoma" and evaluate the diagnosis and safest method of treatment of such cases. METHOD: The world literature was reviewed, particularly concerning diagnostic approaches and therapeutic techniques. RESULTS: The open surgery technique appears to be the safest in the treatment of giant adenoma. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend further study of the factors affecting growth of giant prostatic adenoma.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Aged , Humans , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...