Prenatal Ultrasound Suspicion of Cystic Fibrosis in a Multiethnic Population: Is Extensive CFTR Genotyping Needed?

In families without a Cystic Fibrosis (CF) history, fetal ultrasound bowel abnormalities can unexpectedly reveal the disease. Isolated or in association, the signs can be fetal bowel hyperechogenicity, intestinal loop dilatation and non-visualization of fetal gallbladder. In these cases, search for CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations is part of the recommended diagnostic practices, with a search for frequent mutations according to ethnicity, and, in case of the triad of signs, with an exhaustive study of the gene. However, the molecular diagnosis remains a challenge in populations without well-known frequent pathogenic variants. We present a multiethnic cohort of 108 pregnancies with fetal bowel abnormalities in which the parents benefited from an exhaustive study of the CFTR gene. We describe the new homozygous p.Cys1410* mutation in a fetus of African origin. We did not observe the most frequent p.Phe508del mutation in our cohort but evidenced variants undetected by our frequent mutations kit. Thanks to the progress of sequencing techniques and despite the difficulties of interpretation occasionally encountered, we discuss the need to carry out a comprehensive CFTR study in all patients in case of fetal bowel abnormalities.

An Evaluation of Three Ways of Communicating Carrier Status Results to the Parents of Children in a Neonatal Sickle Cell Screening Programme.

Aim: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most frequent monogenic disease worldwide; ~5-7% of the world population carry a hemoglobin disorder trait. In the US, one in every 1,941 newborns has SCD, whereas one in every 3,000 newborns in France is affected - resulting in 385 new cases and 5,883 newly identified carriers per year. The objective of the present study was to evaluate three different ways of providing information to parents at risk of having a child with SCD, with a view to increasing the parental screening rate and decreasing the number of new cases per year in France. Method: In a randomized study, we contacted 300 couples of parents after their child had been identified as a SCD carrier in the French national newborn screening programme: 100 couples received an information letter (the standard procedure in France: arm A), 100 couples received a letter and then a follow-up phone call (arm B), and 100 received a letter and then three follow-up text messages at 5-day intervals (arm C). The primary endpoint was the number of parents in each arm screened in the 120 days after the letter had been sent. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, the screening rate was 17% in arm A, 35% in arm B, and 30% in arm C. Results: Telephone and text message follow-ups were associated with higher screening rates, compared with no follow-up. After being informed of their child's carrier status, some parents had consulted a healthcare professional but had not been referred for screening (16% in arm A, 19% in arm B, and 13% in arm C). Conclusion: A letter followed by a phone call or three text messages is more effective than a letter alone for informing parents at risk of having a child with SCD. The effective implementation of this follow-up programme probably requires better training of all the healthcare professionals involved.

Sickle SCAN™ (BioMedomics) fulfills analytical conditions for neonatal screening of sickle cell disease.

Sickle SCAN™ is a rapid, qualitative, point-of-care lateral flow immunoassay for the identification of AS, AC, SS/Sß0thal, SC and CC/Cß0thal phenotype. We evaluated this test under the conditions encountered in the French newborn screening (NBS) program for sickle cell disease: a total of 104 dried blood spots (DBSs) were tested with an HPLC reference method and then with the Sickle SCAN™ device. Sickle SCAN™ identified the hemoglobin (Hb) phenotype correctly on 96% of cases. In the four non-concordant cases, the antibody anti-HbS cross-reacted with HbE (n=2), HbD (n=1) or HbX (n=1). There were no false negative. In order to test Sickle SCAN™'s sensitivity to low levels of HbA and HbS in the presence of high HbF levels, we selected another 21 DBS cards with low percentages of HbA (0.6-4.2%) and HbS (2.0-6.9%). HbA and HbS were always detected when present at levels of more than 1% and 2%, respectively. Sickle SCAN™ appears to be an accurate point-of-care method for the identification of newborns with SCD trait. The device meets the criteria for sickle cell disease NBS programs in endemic countries with poor access to laboratory equipment.