The Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve and Branches are in Proximity to the Surgical Approach During Proximal Hamstring Repair.

Purpose: The purpose of our study is to identify the location of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN) and its branches in relation to the proximal hamstring tendon. Methods: Fifteen lower torso human cadaveric specimens were dissected in prone position. Skin and subcutaneous tissues were reflected to expose the gluteal and hamstring musculature. The distance between the ischial tuberosity and lateral border of the hamstring, PFCN, perineal branch of the PFCN, and descending femoral branch of the PFCN was measured with digital calipers. Measurements were repeated three times and averaged. Results: The PFCN was 30.5 ± 11.4 mm lateral to the central tip of the ischial tuberosity (range: 15.7 to 52.0 mm). The average longitudinal distance from the tip of the ischial tuberosity to the point where the perineal branch crossed the hamstrings was 24.1 ± 15.0 mm (range: 9.9 to 52.2 mm). The average longitudinal distance to the point where the descending cutaneous branch crossed the hamstrings was 83.3 ± 21.3 mm (range: 41.3 to 110.3 mm). The PFCN was nearest to the inferior border of the gluteus maximus 45.8 ± 13.6 mm lateral to the ischial tuberosity (range: 13.6 to 62.1 mm). Eleven specimens (73%) had one identifiable perineal branch; four (27%) had two distinct perineal branches. Conclusions: The PFCN was in close proximity to the surgical approach used during proximal hamstring repair, with the perineal branch consistently crossing the surgical field transversely. The location of these nerves varied substantially among the specimens tested, with some nerves less than 1 cm from the ischial tuberosity and 27% of specimens with two perineal branches.

Closed Internal Degloving of the Flank.

Originally described in 1853 by Dr. Morel-Lavellee, closed internal degloving injuries represent an important, although uncommon, source of morbidity in trauma patients. These injuries are typically the result of a shearing or crushing force that traumatically separates the skin and subcutaneous tissue from the underlying fat. This results in disruption of perforating blood vessels and lymphatics, leading to hematoma/seroma formation. We describe two cases in which industrial crush injuries resulted in lumbar transverse process fracture. Both patients developed closed degloving injuries of the flank. To the author's knowledge, this is the first case series describing the occurrence of closed internal degloving injuries of the flank with transverse process fractures. We advise that a high level of suspicion for these lesions to occur with transverse spinal fractures should be maintained, as they may arise several years after initial injury.