Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Data ; 11(1): 304, 2024 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503792

ABSTRACT

Massive increases in the risks of depressive disorders and the ensuing suicide have become the overarching menace for children/adolescents. Despite global consensus to instigate psychological healthcare policy for these children/adolescents, their effects remain largely unclear neither from a small amount of official data nor from small-scale scientific studies. More importantly, in underprivileged children/adolescents in lower-middle-economic-status countries/areas, the data collection may not be as equally accessible as in developed countries/areas, thus resulting in underrepresented observations. To address these challenges, we released a large-scale and multi-center cohort dataset (n = 249,772) showing the effects of primary psychological healthcare on decreasing depression and suicidal ideation in these children/adolescents who were underrepresented in previous studies or current healthcare systems, including unattended children/adolescents, orphans, children/adolescents in especially difficult circumstances, and "left-behind" and "single-parenting" children/adolescents. We provided all individual data recording the depressive symptoms and suicide ideation that had been collected at baseline (Oct 2022) and half-year follow-up (May 2023) from practicing this psychological healthcare system.


Subject(s)
Depression , Suicidal Ideation , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Depression/psychology , Depression/therapy , Socioeconomic Factors , Multicenter Studies as Topic
2.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 124, 2024 Feb 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38355472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examined the association between social support and the severity of positive symptoms in rural community-dwelling schizophrenia patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: The cross-sectional study included 665 rural community-dwelling schizophrenia patients investigated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social support was measured using the Social Support Rating Scale, and positive symptoms were assessed using the Positive Scale extracted from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Multiple linear regression was adopted to examine the association of social support with positive symptoms. RESULT: The scores for total social support, subjective support, objective support and the use of social support were 28.3 ± 5.9, 16.4 ± 5.2, 6.5 ± 1.4 and 5.4 ± 2.8, respectively. Total social support (ß = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.13 to -0.02, P < 0.01) and subjective social support (ß = -0.10, 95%CI: -0.16 to -0.04, P < 0.01) were significantly and negatively associated with the Positive Scale score after adjustment for confounders. Objective social support (ß = 0.11, 95%CI: -0.10 to 0.32, P = 0.31) and the use of social support (ß = -0.03, 95%CI: -0.14 to 0.07, P = 0.53) were not significantly associated with the Positive Scale score. CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the importance of social support, especially subjective support, provided to rural community-dwelling schizophrenia patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. This support should be addressed and strengthened for such patients in emergent events.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Schizophrenia , Humans , Independent Living , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Social Support
4.
BMC Psychiatry ; 22(1): 12, 2022 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34986837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders are often the first presentation of psychopathology in youth and are considered the most common psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents. This study aimed to identify distinct student anxiety profiles to develop targeted interventions. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 9738 students in Yingshan County. Background characteristics were collected and Mental Health Test (MHT) were completed. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was applied to define student anxiety profiles, and then the analysis was repeated using k-means clustering. RESULTS: LPA yielded 3 profiles: the low-risk, mild-risk and high-risk groups, which comprised 29.5, 38.1 and 32.4% of the sample, respectively. Repeating the analysis using k-means clustering resulted in similar groupings. Most students in a particular k-means cluster were primarily in a single LPA-derived student profile. The multinomial ordinal logistic regression results showed that the high-risk group was more likely to be female, junior, and introverted, to live in a town, to have lower or average academic performance, to have heavy or average academic pressure, and to be in schools that have never or occasionally have organized mental health education activities. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that students with anxiety symptoms may be categorized into distinct profiles that are amenable to varying strategies for coordinated interventions.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders , Anxiety , Adolescent , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Child , Cluster Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Students
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...