ABSTRACT
AIMS: To evaluate the ability of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), and Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) to identify primary ovarian cancer (OC) from borderline and benign ovarian tumors (OTs) and explore ideal cutoff points. METHODS: A total of 684 OTs containing 276 OC patients, 116 ovarian borderline OTs and 292 benign OTs patients who underwent surgery in our hospital were included. We retrospectively searched the results of CA125 and HE4 before patients' surgery from the hospital's electronic medical records system. ROMA and CPH-I were calculated according to their menopausal status and age, respectively. Diagnostic performance of these four were assessed by drawing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: CA125, HE4, ROMA, and CPH-I were all significantly higher in OC women compared with borderline OTs (p < 0.001), followed by benign OTs (p < 0.001). Area under the curves (AUCs) for distinguishing OC were 0.850 (0.818-0.882), 0.891 (0.865-0.916), 0.910 (0.888-0.933) and 0.906 (0.882-0.930), respectively, and the corresponding ideal cutoff values for CA125, HE4, ROMA, and CPH-I were 132.5, 68.6, 23.8, and 6.4, respectively. The difference between ROMA and CPH-I was not significant (p = 0.97), but both were higher than CA125 and HE4 (p < 0.05). HE4 showed a significantly higher AUC than CA125 (p < 0.05). For postmenopausal women, CA125 performed equivalently to ROMA (p = 0.73) and CPH-I (p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: In identifying patients with OC, ROMA and CPH-I outperformed single tumor marker. The diagnostic performance of HE4 was significantly higher than that of CA125. CA125 was more suitable for postmenopausal women.
Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , ROC Curve , Algorithms , CA-125 Antigen , Biomarkers, TumorABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer ranks first both in morbidity and mortality in malignancies, but prognostic biological markers are lacking. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was proposed as a convenient biological marker. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of NLR in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This retrospective study screened patients admitted from October 2007 to October 2014. Patients had histopathologically confirmed, treatment-naïve, metastatic NSCLC, and were prescribed platinum doublet chemotherapy. NLR and demographic data were collected, together with the outcome of chemotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 325 patients were enrolled. The cutoff value for NLR (3.19) was determined by receiver operator characteristic analysis. Patients were dichotomized into high (≥3.19) and low (<3.19) NLR groups. Both groups had similar demographic features. However, the low-NLR group had longer PFS (6.1 months) and OS (22.3 months) than the high-NLR group (5.1 months, p = 0.002; 13.1 months, p<0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed that NLR was inversely related to the prognosis of these patients (HR = 1.684, 95%: 1.297-2.185, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study argues that NLR is a convenient prognostic biological marker for advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy and warrants further validation.
