Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(6): 353, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748187

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The integration of palliative care (PC) into oncological management is recommended well before the end of life. It improves quality of life and symptom control and reduces the aggressiveness of end-of-life care. However, its appropriate timing is still debated. Entry into an early-phase clinical trial (ECT) represents hopes for the patient when standard treatments have failed. It is an opportune moment to integrate PC to preserve the patient's general health status. The objective of this study was to evaluate the motives for acceptance or refusal of early PC management in patients included in an ECT. METHODS: Patients eligible to enter an ECT were identified and concomitant PC was proposed. All patients received exploratory interviews conducted by a researcher. Their contents were analyzed in a double-blind thematic analysis with a self-determination model. RESULTS: Motives for acceptance (PC acceptors: n = 27) were both intrinsic (e.g., pain relief, psychological support, anticipation of the future) and extrinsic (e.g., trust in the medical profession, for a relative, to support the advance of research). Motives for refusal (PC refusers: n = 3) were solely intrinsic (e.g., PC associated with death, negative representation of psychological support, no need for additional care, claim of independence). CONCLUSIONS: The motives of acceptors and refusers are not internalized in the same way and call for different autonomy needs. Acceptors and refusers are influenced by opposite representations of PC and a different perception of mixed management.


Subject(s)
Motivation , Neoplasms , Palliative Care , Humans , Palliative Care/psychology , Palliative Care/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , France , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Treatment Refusal/psychology , Clinical Trials as Topic/psychology , Quality of Life , Double-Blind Method , Qualitative Research
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37541781

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The legal landscape surrounding end-of-life care in France is subject to frequent changes. A proposed law to legalise euthanasia in April 2021 has raised questions about the role of physicians. If enacted, oncologists would likely be among the first professionals impacted, as data from countries with legalised euthanasia reveal that patients with cancer constitute the majority of those seeking this option. Currently, little is known about the attitudes of French oncologists towards euthanasia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the position of cancer physicians on euthanasia and their experiences in dealing with patients who request it. METHODS: We conducted individual interviews with 24 cancer specialists (oncologists, radiotherapists and haematologists) at the Centre Léon Bérard in Lyon between August and October 2021. After full transcription, data were analysed thematically and for content. Data triangulation was used to establish the truthworthiness of the findings by two external researchers. RESULTS: Most cancer specialists in our study were opposed to legalising euthanasia, citing concerns about the societal, medical and ethical implications of the practice. They refused physician-assisted suicide based on their ethical duty to preserve life, avoid harm and uphold the Hippocratic Oath. Patient requests for euthanasia were rare. Surprisingly, over a quarter of the physicians interviewed did not rule out receiving active assistance in dying themselves in cases of unbearable or hopeless situations. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the complex and diverse attitudes of cancer physicians towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, reflecting the challenges of integrating individual and collective perspectives on end-of-life issues.

3.
Bull Cancer ; 109(9): 938-947, 2022 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788272

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The announcement of the cessation of cancer treatments is a moment unanimously recognized as difficult for oncologists. More rarely analyzed, the announcement of a transfer to palliative care units is just as much. However, understanding the experience of oncologists during this announcement could make it possible to optimize it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative, prospective, monocentric study with medical oncologists. Semi-structured interviews with 7 open questions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twelve interviews were conducted with a sex ratio of seven women for five men and an average age of 41.9 years. Six themes emerge after horizontal analysis of the verbatim and triangulation of the data. The experience of oncologists is dominated by a feeling of guilt, of fear of causing death anxiety in the patient, and of failure and helplessness in in front of a short-term vital risk. There is also a feeling of frustration at not being able to go through with the care. Facing the escape of the disease, oncologists feel resigned. We also observe projections on the part of oncologists with patients and paramedics. Finally, the existential question of death is an omnipresent concern with the feeling of abandoning the patient and a questioning of skills. However, it seems that the collaboration with the mobile palliative care team (EMSP) and the prospect of creating an internal palliative care unit (USP) at the center are perceived as a help.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Oncologists , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Referral and Consultation
4.
BMJ Open ; 12(4): e060317, 2022 04 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35459679

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A few studies have highlighted the potential synergy between early palliative care and inclusion in an early-phase clinical trial that may improve quality of life, reduce symptoms of exhaustion related to the side effects of treatment and allow patients to complete their treatment protocol. The primary objective of this qualitative study is to evaluate the reasons for acceptance or refusal of early palliative care in patients included in early-phase clinical trials. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: All patients from the Centre Léon Bérard (Comprehensive Cancer Centre in Lyon, France) who consent to one of the early-phase clinical trials proposed at the centre will be invited to participate in this study. The cohort will consist of a subgroup (n=20) of patients who accept palliative care together with their clinical trial, and a second subgroup (n=20) of patients who decline it. Patients will be interviewed in exploratory interviews conducted by a psychology researcher before the start of their clinical trial. The interviews will be audio-recorded. Patients will also be asked to complete quality of life and anxiety/depression questionnaires both before the beginning of the treatment and at the end of their clinical trial. The content of the interviews will be analysed thematically. Descriptive and comparative statistical analysis of both cohorts will also be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Personal data will be collected and processed in accordance with the laws and regulations in force. All patients will give informed consent to participate. This study complies with reference methodology MR004 of the Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés. The protocol has received the validation of an ethics committee (Groupe de Réflexion Ethique du CLB, number: 2020-006). The results will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04717440.


Subject(s)
Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing , Neoplasms , France , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life
5.
Nanoscale Res Lett ; 6: 472, 2011 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21791060

ABSTRACT

We address two aspects of general interest for the chemical synthesis of colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals: (1) the rational design of the synthesis protocol aiming at the optimization of the reaction parameters in a minimum number of experiments; (2) the transfer of the procedure to the gram scale, while maintaining a low size distribution and maximizing the reaction yield. Concerning the first point, the design-of-experiment (DOE) method has been applied to the synthesis of colloidal CdSe nanocrystals. We demonstrate that 16 experiments, analyzed by means of a Taguchi L16 table, are sufficient to optimize the reaction parameters for controlling the mean size of the nanocrystals in a large range while keeping the size distribution narrow (5-10%). The DOE method strongly reduces the number of experiments necessary for the optimization as compared to trial-and-error approaches. Furthermore, the Taguchi table analysis reveals the degree of influence of each reaction parameter investigated (e.g., the nature and concentration of reagents, the solvent, the reaction temperature) and indicates the interactions between them. On the basis of these results, the synthesis has been scaled up by a factor of 20. Using a 2-L batch reactor combined with a high-throughput peristaltic pump, different-sized samples of CdSe nanocrystals with yields of 2-3 g per synthesis have been produced without sacrificing the narrow size distribution. In a similar setup, the gram-scale synthesis of CdSe/CdS/ZnS core/shell/shell nanocrystals exhibiting a fluorescence quantum yield of 81% and excellent resistance of the photoluminescence in presence of a fluorescent quencher (aromatic thiol) has been achieved.PACS: 81.20.Ka, 81.07.Bc, 78.67.Bf.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...