Comparative effectiveness of stereotactic, subdural, or hybrid intracranial EEG monitoring in epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical intervention can be curative or palliative for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, if the seizure onset zone (SOZ) cannot be adequately localized via noninvasive tests, intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings are often carried out to develop surgical plans in appropriate candidates. Stereotactic EEG (SEEG), subdural EEG (SDE), and SDE with depth electrodes (hybrid) are major tools used for investigation, but there is no class 1 or 2 evidence comparing the effectiveness of these modalities. METHODS: The authors identified an institutional cohort of patients who underwent iEEG monitoring between 2001 and 2022. Demographic data, preoperative clinical features, iEEG intervention, and follow-up data were identified. Primary study endpoints included the following: 1) likelihood of SOZ localization; 2) likelihood of surgical treatment after iEEG; 3) seizure outcomes; and 4) complications. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were identified (176 in the SEEG, 60 in the SDE, and 93 in the hybrid cohort) who were followed for a median of 5.4 (IQR 6.8) years. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, mean age at epilepsy diagnosis, mean age at iEEG investigation, number of preoperative antiseizure medications, and preoperative seizure frequency, were not statistically different across the 3 cohorts. Patients in the SEEG cohort were more likely to have their SOZ localized than were the patients in the SDE group (OR 2.3) and were less likely to undergo subsequent resection (OR 0.3) or to have complications (OR 0.4), although there was no statistical difference with respect to likelihood of undergoing any subsequent neurosurgical treatment, or with respect to favorable seizure outcomes. Patients in the hybrid cohort were more likely to have SOZ localized than were patients in the SDE group (OR 3.1), but were more likely to undergo resection (OR 4.9) or any neurosurgical treatment (OR 2.5) compared to patients in the SEEG group. Patients in the hybrid cohort had better seizure outcomes compared to the SDE (OR 2.3) but not to the SEEG group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the SEEG group were more likely to have their SOZ localized and patients in the SDE group were more likely to undergo resection, but they did not differ with respect to seizure outcomes.

Activity-dependent development of the body's touch receptors.

We report a role for activity in the development of the primary sensory neurons that detect touch. Genetic deletion of Piezo2, the principal mechanosensitive ion channel in somatosensory neurons, caused profound changes in the formation of mechanosensory end organ structures and altered somatosensory neuron central targeting. Single cell RNA sequencing of Piezo2 conditional mutants revealed changes in gene expression in the sensory neurons activated by light mechanical forces, whereas other neuronal classes were less affected. To further test the role of activity in mechanosensory end organ development, we genetically deleted the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.6 (Scn8a) in somatosensory neurons throughout development and found that Scn8a mutants also have disrupted somatosensory neuron morphologies and altered electrophysiological responses to mechanical stimuli. Together, these findings indicate that mechanically evoked neuronal activity acts early in life to shape the maturation of the mechanosensory end organs that underlie our sense of gentle touch.

Mechanoreceptor synapses in the brainstem shape the central representation of touch.

Mammals use glabrous (hairless) skin of their hands and feet to navigate and manipulate their environment. Cortical maps of the body surface across species contain disproportionately large numbers of neurons dedicated to glabrous skin sensation, in part reflecting a higher density of mechanoreceptors that innervate these skin regions. Here, we find that disproportionate representation of glabrous skin emerges over postnatal development at the first synapse between peripheral mechanoreceptors and their central targets in the brainstem. Mechanoreceptor synapses undergo developmental refinement that depends on proximity of their terminals to glabrous skin, such that those innervating glabrous skin make synaptic connections that expand their central representation. In mice incapable of sensing gentle touch, mechanoreceptors innervating glabrous skin still make more powerful synapses in the brainstem. We propose that the skin region a mechanoreceptor innervates controls the developmental refinement of its central synapses to shape the representation of touch in the brain.