ABSTRACT
Instruments designed to evaluate the necessity of compulsory psychiatric treatment (CPT) are scarce to non-existent. We developed a 25-item Checklist (scoring 0 to 50) with four clusters (Legal, Danger, Historic and Cognitive), based on variables identified as relevant to compulsory treatment. The Compulsory Treatment Checklist (CTC) was filled with information on case (n=324) and control (n=251) subjects, evaluated under the Portuguese Mental Health Act (Law 36/98), in three hospitals. For internal validation, we used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), testing unidimensional and bifactor models. Multilevel logistic regression model (MLL) was used to predict the odds ratio (OR) for compulsory treatment based on the total scale score. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis (ROC) was performed to predict compulsory treatment. CFA revealed the best fit indexes for the bifactor model, with all items loading on one General factor and the residual loading in the a priori predicted four specific factors. Reliability indexes were high for the General factor (88.4%), and low for specific factors (<5%), which demonstrate that CTC should not be performed in the subscales to access compulsory treatment. MLL reveals that for each item scored in the scale, it increases the OR by 1.26 for compulsory treatment (95%CI 1.21-1.31, p<0.001). Based on the total score, accuracy was 90%, and the best cut-off point of 23.5 detects compulsory treatment with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 93.6%. The CTC presents robust internal structure with a strong unidimensional characteristic, and a cut-off point for compulsory treatment of 23.5. The improved 20-item version of the CTC could represent an important instrument to improve clinical decision regarding CPT, and ultimately to improve mental health care of patients with severe psychiatric disorders.
Subject(s)
Checklist/instrumentation , Checklist/standards , Commitment of Mentally Ill , Forensic Psychiatry/instrumentation , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cognition , Commitment of Mentally Ill/legislation & jurisprudence , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mandatory Programs , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Middle Aged , Portugal , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Violence , Young AdultABSTRACT
The authors report a case of a 68-year-old man with an unrecognized insulinoma manifesting with neuropsychiatric symptoms. For two years, he presented with unspecified behavior changes, autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms, which led him to be misdiagnosed with a neurologic and psychiatric disorder before the insulinoma was recognized. Following neurological alterations in context of hypoglycemia, subsequent to longstanding food refusal, he was admitted in the psychiatric ward. Despite good global response and normal food intake, hypoglycemic episodes were still occurring and led to a careful evaluation which permitted the definitive diagnostic. This case highlights the diagnostic difficulties of medical disorders presenting with clinical features overlapping neurological and psychiatric syndromes. It also reflects the diagnostic difficulties in rare clinical entities, particularly in patients previously followed in psychiatry and underlines the need for a constant dialogue and updating of clinicians.
Subject(s)
Delusions/psychology , Feeding Behavior/psychology , Hypochondriasis/psychology , Insulinoma/psychology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/psychology , Aged , Delusions/diagnosis , Humans , Hypochondriasis/diagnosis , Hypoglycemia/etiology , Insulinoma/complications , Insulinoma/diagnosis , Male , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosisABSTRACT
Introduction Elderly patients occupy up to 65% of acute hospital beds and a significant proportion of them present with a comorbid psychiatric condition such as depression, delirium or dementia. Liaison old age psychiatry (LOAP) services have been developed to provide psychiatric consultation in medical and surgical settings, improving at the same time the knowledge and expertise of general ward staff. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical characteristics across different psychiatric disorders among elderly patients in medical wards. Method A prospective observational study was developed between October 2011 and January 2013, which involved 107 subjects aged 65 years or older that were hospitalised in the Department of Internal Medicine and referred to the LOAP service. Psychiatric diagnostic was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method, the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Clinical Global Impression Scale. Results Delirium (40.6%), depression (22.4%) and dementia (20.4%) were the most common psychiatric diagnoses. Patients with delirium were significantly older, had more severe psychiatric symptomatology (mean CGI = 5.35) and presented infectious processes as acute medical conditions more frequently than the other patients. Conclusion Psychiatric disturbances occurring in elderly inpatients in medical wards are highly prevalent and complex. A LOAP service may play an important role in effectively reducing the overutilisation and consumption of health resources through early recognition of these conditions, effective management and prevention of adverse outcomes, and effective communication with out-patient clinics, community mental health teams and day-care centres.
