A pre-discharge project--does GP willingness equal involvement?

OBJECTIVE: To compare GPs' willingness to participate in a GP pre-discharge project as measured by a survey, with actual participation rates. To identify the characteristics of GPs likely to make a pre-discharge visit to frail, aged inpatients admitted under the care of a geriatrician. METHOD PRE-IMPLEMENTATION GP SURVEY: Survey of a random sample of 100 GPs from the Central Sydney area using a standardised questionnaire. PRE-DISCHARGE VISIT PROJECT: Information on actual participation rates and GPs who declined to make a pre-discharge visit was obtained from an audit of Division of General Practice records. Information on Patient characteristics was obtained from patient interviews and medical records. The survey was conducted at the Balmain Hospital and Concord Repatriation and General Hospitals located within the Central Sydney Area Health Service. The subjects were GPs practising in central Sydney and patients admitted under the care of a geriatrician at Balmain and Concord Hospitals. RESULTS: Twenty-nine per cent of GPs reported that they were willing to undertake visits without remuneration and 71% reported they were willing to make a pre-discharge visit if remunerated. Fifty-three per cent of GPs actually complied with a request to make a remunerated pre-discharge visit. This was 18% less than the rate determined by the survey. GPs were less likely to make a visit if they were solo practitioners and not members of the Division. Patients who were more dependent, as measured by total Barthel's score, and those from nursing homes were less likely to receive a visit. CONCLUSION: GP surveys may overestimate participation rates in Division projects. In reality, it appears difficult for GPs to accommodate pre-discharge visits in a general practice routine and the offered remunerations may not be adequate compensation for time lost when undertaking a pre-discharge visit. Lastly, some GPs may not see a benefit in visiting more dependent patients.

As good as anyone: antenatal shared care at an inner Sydney hospital.

An exploratory survey design was used to assess satisfaction with antenatal care over a two-month period of women giving birth in an inner Sydney teaching hospital. Patients received obstetric services from private obstetricians, midwives, the hospital outpatient clinic, or 'shared care' between general practitioners and the outpatient clinic or birth centre. Insurance status and demographic information were collected across all groups. Shared care patients gave reasons why they chose that model of antenatal service. Ten per cent of women in the sample received shared care. Shared care patients were equally as satisfied as those in other modes of care in all but one factor--promptness of service (in which private obstetricians received higher ratings). They also judged shared care to have the advantages of being convenient, personal, and culturally appropriate. Significantly more patients in the shared care group were born overseas and they were less likely to hold private insurance. This paper discusses the results of the current study in the context of the Australian literature, explores some issues surrounding satisfaction research, and suggests further research arising from this work.

Hospital in the Home project: Royal Prince Alfred Hospital.

The Central Sydney Area Health Service has developed and piloted a Hospital in the Home program as an alternative to inpatient admission. Hospital in the Home offers the opportunity for increased productivity of existing hospital services, and advantages for patients in terms of satisfaction and improved or comparable clinical outcomes. Having developed treatment protocols and established a core Hospital in the Home team, a wider demonstration project across three hospitals within the Central Sydney Area Health Service is proposed.