ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To examine the predictive validity of the HCR-20 (The Historical Clinical Risk Management-20) to predict future violent incidents in a representative sample of patients with severe mental disorders and with a history of previous admission to prison, who after release are in a situation of extreme social exclusion. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study sample was selected from the 235 patients treated by the Mental Health Street Team of Madrid (ECASAM) from June 2014 to June 2017, including those with a previous history of a previous internment in a penitentiary (about which, the HCR-20 was completed). RESULTS: Of the 44 patients included, 29.6% (n=13) ended up participating in a violent incident after the release. The ROC curves (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis indicated that the total score of HCR-20 (AUC 0.98, p=0.01) has a high predictive validity. CONCLUSIONS: The social and medical changes that take place after the release of patients with severe mental illness justify the need to reassess the risk of violence. In this evaluation, the HCR-20 guide is a useful tool for predicting the risk of involvement in future violent incidents, and the inclusion of factors such as social exclusion and its consequences, as well as problems with substance use is especially important.
Subject(s)
Criminals/psychology , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Psychological Tests , Recidivism/psychology , Social Isolation/psychology , Violence/psychology , Adult , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prisoners/psychology , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Management , Social Marginalization/psychology , Violence/prevention & controlABSTRACT
OBJETIVOS: Examinar la validez predictiva de la guía HCR-20 (The Historical Clinical Risk Management-20) para predecir futuros incidentes violentos en una muestra representativa de pacientes con trastorno mental grave y con antecedentes de ingreso previo en prisión, que tras la excarcelación presentan una situación de exclusión social extrema. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: La muestra del estudio se seleccionó de los 235 pacientes atendidos por el Equipo de Calle de Salud Mental (ECASAM) de Madrid, desde junio de 2014 hasta junio de 2017, incluyendo finalmente a aquellos con antecedentes de un internamiento previo en un establecimiento penitenciario, sobre los que posteriormente se cumplimentó la HCR-20. RESULTADOS: De los 44 pacientes incluidos, un 29,6% (n=13) terminaron protagonizando un incidente violento tras la excarcelación. El análisis de curvas ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) indicó que la puntuación total de la HCR-20 (área bajo la curva o AUC: 0,98, p = 0,01) tiene una alta validez predictiva. CONCLUSIONES: Los cambios sociosanitarios que se van a producir tras la excarcelación de los pacientes con trastorno mental grave justifican la necesidad de revaluar el riesgo de violencia. En esta evaluación, la aplicación de la guía HCR-20 resulta una útil herramienta para predecir el riesgo de protagonizar futuros incidentes violentos, siendo especialmente relevante la consideración de factores como la exclusión social y sus consecuencias, así como los problemas con el consumo de sustancias
OBJECTIVES: To examine the predictive validity of the HCR-20 (The Historical Clinical Risk Management-20) to predict future violent incidents in a representative sample of patients with severe mental disorders and with a history of previous admission to prison, who after release are in a situation of extreme social exclusion. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study sample was selected from the 235 patients treated by the Mental Health Street Team of Madrid (ECASAM) from June 2014 to June 2017, including those with a previous history of a previous internment in a penitentiary (about which, the HCR-20 was completed). RESULTS: Of the 44 patients included, 29.6% (n=13) ended up participating in a violent incident after the release. The ROC curves (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis indicated that the total score of HCR-20 (AUC 0.98, p = 0.01) has a high predictive validity. CONCLUSIONS: The social and medical changes that take place after the release of patients with severe mental illness justify the need to reassess the risk of violence. In this evaluation, the HCR-20 guide is a useful tool for predicting the risk of involvement in future violent incidents, and the inclusion of factors such as social exclusion and its consequences, as well as problems with substance use is especially important
Subject(s)
Humans , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Social Marginalization/psychology , Prisons/statistics & numerical data , Prisoners/psychology , Violence/psychology , Community Integration/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Risk Management/methods , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Late-onset forms of psychosis have been the object of increasing interest in recent years. Despite the fact that there are still many obscure areas, significant advances in the pathophysiology, delimitation of risk factors, clinical presentation, neuropsychology and the pharmacological treatment have been made. Nevertheless, the psychological aspects of both aetiology and treatment of these late forms of psychosis have received much less attention than the rest. In contrast with that, the clinician is confronted with the need to manage patients that are reluctant to take medications and in which the outcome of pharmacological treatments is not always optimal. The elderly psychotic patient should not be excluded from the possibility of receiving any kind of psychological help. He may benefit from adaptations of different psychotherapeutic measures that can include the more classical techniques as psychodynamic oriented and behavioural-cognitive therapies or the newer forms of treatment specially designed for the aged, as reminiscence or psychomotor therapy. In any case, to obtain any result the patient needs to be managed in a way that goes well further the prescription of a neuroleptic drug. In this paper we review some of the most important psychological cues for the understanding of the elderly psychotic patient. Furthermore, we divide the therapeutic relationship over the time in three parts: The initial contact, the central phase and the termination. We offer some keys for the practical management of the patient in each of these phases, with special attention to the adherence to treatment and early identification of treatment-emergent complications like depressive symptoms or hypochondriac concerns.