Generating genetic risk scores from intermediate phenotypes for use in association studies of clinically significant endpoints.

While previous results of genetic association studies for common, complex diseases (eg., coronary artery disease, CAD) have been disappointing, examination of multiple related genes within a physiologic pathway may provide improved resolution. This paper describes a method of calculating a genetic risk score (GRS) for a clinical endpoint by integrating data from many candidate genes and multiple intermediate phenotypes (IPs). First, the association of all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to an IP is determined and regression beta-coefficients are used to calculate an IP-specific GRS for each individual, repeating this analysis for every IP. Next, the IPs are assessed by a second regression as predictors of the clinical endpoint. Each IP's individual GRS is then weighted by the regression beta-coefficients from the second step, creating a single, composite GRS. As an example, 3,172 patients undergoing coronary angiography were evaluated for 3 SNPs from the cholesterol metabolism pathway. Although these data provide only a preliminary example, the GRS method detected significant differences in CAD by GRS group, whereas separate genotypes did not. These results illustrate the potential of the GRS methodology for multigenic risk evaluation and suggest that such approaches deserve further examination in common, complex diseases such as CAD.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of cyclosporine microemulsion in heart transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind comparison with the oil-based formulation of cyclosporine--results at 24 months after transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of cyclosporine has improved the survival of cardiac transplant patients as a result of reduced morbidity and mortality from rejection and infection. The original oil-based form of cyclosporine demonstrated unpredictable absorption resulting in an increased frequency of acute and chronic rejection in patients with poor bioavailability. The primary end. points of the present, prospective, randomized multicenter, double-blind trial were to compare the efficacy of the micro-emulsion form of cycolsporine (CsA-NL) with the oil-based formulation as determined by cardiac allograft and recipient survival and the incidence and severity of the acute rejection episodes and to determine the safety and tolerability of CsA-NL compared with Sandimmune CsA-(SM) in the study population. The 6-month analysis of the study showed reduced number of CsA-NL patients requiring antilymphocyte antibody therapy for rejection, fewer International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or =3A rejections in female patients and fewer infections. Our report represents the final analysis of the results 24 months after transplantation. METHODS: A total of 380 patients undergoing de novo cardiac transplants at 24 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of CsA-NL versus CsA-SM. Acute allograft rejection was diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy and graded according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation nomenclature. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Fisher's exact test were used for comparisons between groups. RESULTS: After 24 months, allograft and recipient survival were identical in both groups. There were fewer CsA-NL patients (6.9%) requiring antilymphocyte antibody therapy for rejection than in the CsA-SM-treated patient group (17.7%, P=0.002). There were fewer discontinuations of study drug for treatment failures in the CsA-NL groups (7; 3.7%) compared with the CsA-SM group (18; 9.4%, P=0.037). The average corticosteroid dose was lower in the CsA-NL group (0.37 mg/kg/day) compared with the CsA-SM group (0.48 mg/kg/day, P=0.034) over the 24-month study period. Overall, there was no difference in blood pressure or creatinine between the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The final results of this multi-center, randomized study of two forms of cyclosporine confirmed that there were fewer episodes of rejection requiring antilymphocyte antibodies and fewer study discontinuations for treatment failures in CsA-NL-treated patients compared to those treated with CsA-SM. The use of CsA-NL did not predispose these patients to a higher risk of adverse events.

Cardiac transplantation in survivors of lymphoma: a multi-institutional survey.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac transplantation has been successfully performed in patients with a history of presumably cured Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Though the risk of recurrence is a major concern, the long-term influence of prior cancer and cancer therapy on posttransplant outcome has not been previously investigated. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 130 cardiac transplant centers in the United States registered with the United Network for Organ Sharing. Data collected included patient demographics; type, stage, and timing of HD/NHL; treatment for HD/NHL; posttransplant immunosuppressive regimen, rejection history, and outcomes; and Epstein-Barr virus status. RESULTS: Thirty-four cardiac transplant recipients with a previous history of HD (n=16) or NHL (n=18) were identified. HD patients averaged 41+/-15 years of age, with a mean disease-free interval of 15+/-9 years at the time of transplantation. NHL patients averaged 42+/-17 years of age with a mean disease-free interval of 10+/-9 years at the time of transplantation. The mean follow-up for the entire group was 50 months (range, 2 days to 136 months), and mean follow-up for the survivors was 67 months (range, 23-136 months). The 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 10-year actuarial survival estimates for the entire group are 77%, 64%, 64%, 64%, and 50%, respectively. Actuarial survival was lower in HD patients (P=0.04) and in patients who had previously undergone splenectomy (P=0.008). Cox regression analysis identified only prior splenectomy (P=0.02) as an independent risk factor for mortality after cardiac transplantation with an adjusted relative risk of 6.2 (1.7-21.9, 95% confidence intervals). CONCLUSIONS: Although the numbers are small, these data strongly suggest that there is an increased mortality risk for cardiac transplant recipients with prior HD who have undergone splenectomy.

New UNOS rules: historical background and implications for transplantation management. United Network for Organ Sharing.

The algorithm for the allocation of donor hearts used by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) was changed in January 1999. The new scheme alters the medical urgency criteria from a 2-tiered to a 3-tiered system. Blood type O and blood type B candidates are less disadvantaged and pediatric candidates are somewhat advantaged with regard to adolescent donors. The new allocation algorithm allows an individual with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias to be listed in the highest urgency status. Increased regulation will occur with the establishment of a review for the highest urgency status and the establishment of regional review boards.

Safety, tolerability and efficacy of cyclosporine microemulsion in heart transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind comparison with the oil based formulation of cyclosporine--results at six months after transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of cyclosporine has resulted in significant improvement in the survival of cardiac allograft recipients due to decreased mortality from infection and rejection. The original oil-based cyclosporine formulation exhibits variable and unpredictable bioavailability that correlates with an increased incidence of acute and chronic rejection in those patients in whom this is most pronounced. The primary objectives of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in cardiac transplant patients were: to compare the efficacy of cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-NL) with oil-based cyclosporine (CsA-SM) as measured by cardiac allograft and recipient survival and the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes; and to assess the safety and tolerability of CsA-NL compared with CsA-SM in this population. This report represents the analysis of results 6 months after transplantation. METHODS: A total of 380 patients undergoing their first cardiac transplant at 24 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized trial examining the safety and efficacy of CsA-NL versus CsA-SM. Rejection was diagnosed using endomyocardial biopsy and were graded according to standardized criteria of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Clinical parameters were monitored during the study. Survival and freedom from were used for analysis as was Fisher's exact test for comparisons between groups. RESULTS: At 6 months after transplantation, allograft and patient survival were the same for both groups. The frequency of ISHLT grade 3A or greater episodes in the two groups was identical. Fewer CsA-NL patients (5.9%) required antilymphocyte antibody (ATG or OKT-3) therapy for rejection compared with the CsA-SM-treated patients (14.1%, P=0.01). Females with ISHLT rejection grade > or = 3A treated with CsA-NL had a 46% lower incidence of rejection compared with the CsA-SM-treated group (31.3% vs. 57.6%, P=0.032). Fewer infections were seen in the CsA-NL. With the exception of baseline and 1 week posttransplant creatinines which were higher in the CsA-NL group, the overall creatinine was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter, randomized study of cardiac transplant recipients documented less severe rejection (in particular those requiring antibody therapy) and a lower incidence of infection in CsA-NL-treated patients. Results from the female subgroup analysis suggest that the improved bioavailability of CsA-NL might reduce the frequency of rejection episodes in female patients. The use of CsA-NL was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events.

Increased incidence of allograft rejection in stable heart transplant recipients after late conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a safe and effective immunosuppressive agent in kidney and liver transplantation. Preliminary studies also support its use in heart transplantation. However, the cost of MMF is substantially greater than azathioprine (AZA), the current alternative. Since the majority of rejection episodes occur within the first few months of transplantation, using MMF early after transplantation and subsequently converting to AZA, after the risk of rejection has diminished, might be cost-effective. In order to evaluate the safety of such a strategy in heart transplant recipients, we reviewed the rejection profiles of a group of patients who were converted from MMF to AZA late after transplantation. Forty-three stable patients on chronic MMF therapy as part of an open-label, long-term safety study were converted to either commercially available MMF (CellCept) or AZA, at the conclusion of the study. Demographic variables, rejection histories before and after conversion, and immunosuppressive regimens were examined. Twenty-three patients were continued on commercial MMF and 20 were converted to AZA therapy. The average duration of MMF therapy prior to conversion was 41 months in each group. Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. Treated allograft rejection occurred in 10 of 20 patients converting to AZA, as compared to only 1 of 23 patients remaining on MMF; p = 0.002. Additionally, mean scores (1-5 scale) for the three biopsies before and after conversion favored continued MMF therapy (1.5+/-0.6 before and 1.2+/-0.4 after conversion in MMF group vs. 1.3+/-0.5 before and 1.7+/-0.9 after conversion to AZA; p = 0.02). No allograft loss occurred as a result of conversion. These data suggest that conversion from MMF to AZA, even late after transplantation, can be associated with allograft rejection. The costs associated with these rejection episodes (the additional immunosuppressive agents, endomyocardial biopsies, and physician visits) may exceed the potential cost savings of converting stable heart transplant recipients from MMF to AZA.

Impact of prophylactic immediate posttransplant ganciclovir on development of transplant atherosclerosis: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease occurs in an accelerated fashion in the donor heart after heart transplantation (TxCAD), but the cause is poorly understood. The risk of developing TxCAD is increased by cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and decreased by use of calcium blockers. Our group observed that prophylactic administration of ganciclovir early after heart transplantation inhibited CMV illness, and we now propose to determine whether this therapy also prevents TxCAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine consecutive patients (131 men and 18 women aged 48+/-13 years) were randomized to receive either ganciclovir or placebo during the initial 28 days after heart transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of muromonab-CD3 (OKT-3) prophylaxis and maintenance with cyclosporine, prednisone, and azathioprine. Mean follow-up time was 4.7+/-1.3 years. In a post hoc analysis of this trial designed to assess efficacy of ganciclovir for prevention of CMV disease, we compared the actuarial incidence of TxCAD, defined by annual angiography as the presence of any stenosis. Because calcium blockers have been shown to prevent TxCAD, we analyzed the results by stratifying patients according to use of calcium blockers. TxCAD could not be evaluated in 28 patients because of early death or limited follow-up. Among the evaluable patients, actuarial incidence of TxCAD at follow-up (mean, 4.7 years) in ganciclovir-treated patients (n=62) compared with placebo (n=59) was 43+/-8% versus 60+/-10% (P<0.1). By Cox multivariate analysis, independent predictors of TxCAD were donor age >40 years (relative risk, 2.7; CI, 1.3 to 5.5; P<0.01) and no ganciclovir (relative risk, 2.1; CI, 1.1 to 5.3; P=0.04). Stratification on the basis of calcium blocker use revealed differences in TxCAD incidence when ganciclovir and placebo were compared: no calcium blockers (n=53), 32+/-11% (n=28) for ganciclovir versus 62+/-16% (n=25) for placebo (P<0.03); calcium blockers (n=68), 50+/-14% (n=33) for ganciclovir versus 45+/-12% (n=35) for placebo (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: TxCAD incidence appears to be lower in patients treated with ganciclovir who are not treated with calcium blockers. Given the limitations imposed by post hoc analysis, a randomized clinical trial is required to address this issue.

A randomized, multicenter comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine immunosuppressive regimens in cardiac transplantation: decreased hyperlipidemia and hypertension with tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression seems safe and effective in liver and kidney transplantation. To assess the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression after cardiac transplantation as well as the relative impact of tacrolimus on immunosuppression-related side effects such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia, we conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of otherwise identical tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimens in adult patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Eighty-five adult patients (pts) at six United States cardiac transplant centers, undergoing their first cardiac transplant procedure, were prospectively randomized to receive either TAC-based (n = 39) or cyclosporine (CYA)-based (n = 46) immunosuppression. All pts received a triple-drug protocol with 15 pts (18%) receiving peri-operative OKT3 to delay TAC/CYA due to pre-transplant renal dysfunction. Endomyocardial biopsies were performed at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, and 52. The study duration was 12 months. RESULTS: Patients were mostly male (87%) Caucasian (90%) with a mean age of 54 years and primary diagnoses of coronary artery disease (55%) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (41%). There were no significant demographic differences between groups. Patient and allograft survival were not different in the two groups. The probability and overall incidence of each grade of rejection, whether treated or not, and the types of treatment required did not differ between the groups. At baseline and through 12 months of follow-up, chemistry and hematology values were similar between the groups except serum cholesterol was higher in the CYA group at 3, 6, and 12 months (239 vs 205 mg/dL, 246 vs 191 mg/dL, 212 vs 186 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.001). Likewise, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly higher in the CYA group. More CYA patients received therapy for hypercholesterolemia (71% vs 41% at 12 months, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in renal function, hyperglycemia, hypomagnesemia, or hyperkalemia during the first 12 months. More CYA patients developed new-onset hypertension requiring pharmacologic treatment (71% vs 48%, p = 0.05). The incidence of infection was the same for the two groups (2.6 episodes/pt/12 month follow-up). CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression seems effective for rejection prophylaxis during the first year after cardiac transplantation and is associated with less hypertension and hyperlipidemia and no difference in renal function, hyperglycemia or infection incidence when compared to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.

Avoidance of cellular blood product transfusions in LVAD recipients does not prevent HLA allosensitization.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of cellular blood products during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has been associated with HLA allosensitization, resulting in the need for a negative prospective cross-match and prolonged transplant waiting times. In order to prevent this risk, we developed a protocol to avoid transfusion of cellular blood products. METHODS: The protocol included preoperative patient stabilization, perioperative recombinant erythropoietin and blood conservation strategies, and postoperative monitoring of mixed venous oxygen saturation (SVO2) to assure adequate peripheral oxygen delivery. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) was measured in all patients pre and post LVAD placement to assess HLA sensitization. RESULTS: Seven consecutive patients underwent LVAD implantation without transfusion of blood or platelets, one of whom expired perioperatively. Mean hematocrit was 35.2% preoperatively, and 21.8% postoperatively, reaching a nadir of 20.2%. Postoperative SVO2 was >60% in all patients. In the six survivors, mean hematocrit reach 24.3%, 27.3%, and 33.0% by postoperative day seven, fourteen, and thirty, respectively. PRA in three patients was 0% preoperatively and remained 0% until transplantation after 33, 34, and 50 days of support. In two patients, preoperative PRA was 7% and 17%, dropped to 3% and 0% after thirty days, then progressively rose to 96% and 100% after 60 and 90 days, respectively. In one other patient, preoperative PRA was 0%, remained at 0% after thirty days, then rose to 96% by 60 days. CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding transfusion of cellular blood products in LVAD recipients is safe and well tolerated, but does not universally protect from HLA allosensitization. Other factors may also produce sensitization, such as immunogenic components of the LVAD, soluble antigen in fresh frozen plasma, or latent sensitization which is not initially evident in critically ill and possibly anergic patients.

A randomized active-controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients. Mycophenolate Mofetil Investigators.

BACKGROUND: After heart transplantation, 1-year and 5-year survival rates are 79% and 63%, respectively, with rejection, infection, and allograft coronary artery disease accounting for the majority of deaths. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an inhibitor of the de novo pathway for purine biosynthesis, decreases rejection in animals and in human renal transplantation. METHODS: In a double-blind, active-controlled trial, 28 centers randomized 650 patients undergoing their first heart transplant to receive MMF (3000 mg/day) or azathioprine (1.5-3 mg/kg/day), in addition to cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Rejection and survival data were obtained for 6 and 12 months, respectively. Because 11% of the patients withdrew before receiving study drug, data were analyzed on all randomized patients (enrolled patients) and on patients who received study medications (treated patients). RESULTS: Survival and rejection were similar in enrolled patients (MMF, n=327; azathioprine, n=323). In treated patients (MMF, n=289; azathioprine, n=289), the MMF group compared with the azathioprine group was associated with significant reduction in mortality at 1 year (18 [6.2%] versus 33 deaths [11.4%]; P=0.031) and a significant reduction in the requirement for rejection treatment (65.7% versus 73.7%; P=0.026). There was a trend for fewer MMF patients to have > or = grade 3A rejection (45.0% versus 52.9%; P=0.055) or require the murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody or antithymocyte globulin (15.2% versus 21.1%; P=0.061). Opportunistic infections, mostly herpes simplex, were more common in the MMF group (53.3% versus 43.6%; P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Substitution of MMF for azathioprine may reduce mortality and rejection in the first year after cardiac transplantation.

Adjuvant intrapleural amphotericin B therapy for pulmonary mucormycosis in a cardiac allograft recipient.

Infectious complications after heart transplantation remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality. While many viral, bacterial, and protozoal infections can be successfully treated, fungal infections continue to be challenging. Mucormycosis is a rare infection in heart transplant recipients; however, mortality is exceedingly high. We report a case of cavitary Rhizopus lung infection 2 months after cardiac transplantation. The infection was complicated by inadvertent exposure of the pleural cavity to the fungus during surgical resection. Therapy consisted of standard systemic amphotericin B, surgical excision, and for the first time, the use of adjuvant intrapleural amphotericin B. Cure was achieved with no clinical or radiological evidence of disease at 3 months follow-up. Rhizopus pulmonary infection is a rare complication of cardiac transplantation. Treatment consists of the triad of systemic anti-fungal therapy, surgical resection, and control of any underlying predisposing diseases. Adjuvant intrapleural amphotericin B use could also be considered in patients with fungal pneumonias and evidence of chest wall and/or pleural cavity involvement.

Incidence of adenomatous colorectal polyps in cardiac transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluates the effects of long-term immunosuppression after cardiac transplantation on the risk for adenomatous polyps. METHODS: The endoscopic procedures performed at LDS and University Hospitals in cardiac transplant recipients were reviewed and compared with results from a previously studied control group. RESULTS: A total of 123 endoscopic procedures were performed in 98 heart transplant patients (59% for cancer screening and 41% for gastrointestinal complaints). Eighty-five percent of patients were male and 15% were female; their mean age was 57 years. In the group <3 years posttransplant, adenomatous polyps were present in 25%, hyperplastic polyps were present in 10%, and synchronous lesions in 3 patients. In the group >3 years posttransplant, adenomatous polyps were present in 16%, hyperplastic polyps were present in 22%, and synchronous lesions in were evident in 3 patients. No significant difference with results from a previously studied control group. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term immunosuppression does not increase the risk for adenomatous polyps of the colon.

Cyclophosphamide in cardiac transplant recipients with frequent rejection: a six-year retrospective review.

Allograft rejection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Cyclophosphamide, a nitrogen mustard, is a potent immunosuppressive agent with effects on both T- and B-lymphocytes, and thus may be effective in preventing further cellular and/or humoral rejection in cardiac transplant recipients with recurrent or recalcitrant rejection. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 320 surviving cardiac transplant recipients. Cyclophosphamide was substituted for azathioprine in 28 patients because of frequent allograft rejection. We then reviewed the rejection history of these 28 patients, specifically looking at rejection frequency, type (cellular, vascular or mixed), and treatment. Cyclophosphamide was substituted for azathioprine at an average of 8.4 +/- 2.8 months after transplantation. Despite a 56.0% reduction in prednisone dose (p < 0.001), at least a threefold reduction in rejection frequency (p < 0.001) was observed, while cyclosporine levels were unchanged. Twenty-eight percent of the patients did not experience even mild rejection after beginning therapy with cyclophosphamide, 55% had 1 or 2 subsequent mild or moderate rejection episodes, and only 17% had more than two subsequent episodes of mild or moderate rejection. Overall, the number of treated rejection episodes decreased from 0.37 episodes per patient month with azathioprine to 0.10 episodes per patient month on therapy with cyclophosphamide. Separating the patients into two groups based on the predominant rejection type (cellular vs. vascular) occurring at the time of cyclophosphamide substitution revealed a similar reduction in cellular and vascular rejection in each respective group. While white blood cell count decreased by 16%, cyclophosphamide was not discontinued in any patient due to leukopenia, and no change was noted in hematocrit. Cyclophosphamide appears to be safe and effective in maintenance immunosuppression and may reduce rejection frequency in some patients with frequently occurring allograft rejection without necessitating the augmentation of either corticosteroids or cyclosporine.

Improved long-term survival after heart transplantation predicted by successful early withdrawal from maintenance corticosteroid therapy.

BACKGROUND: Short-term studies suggest that cardiac transplant immunosuppression without maintenance corticosteroids is feasible in selected patients. However, concern exists as to the long-term effects, specifically the possibility of increased morbidity and mortality because of late allograft rejection and allograft coronary artery disease. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records from 441 consecutive heart transplantation procedures done in 416 patients with use of an immunosuppressive protocol that attempted corticosteroid withdrawal within 2 months of transplantation. forty-two patients died or underwent retransplantation during the first 3 months and were excluded from further analysis. Analysis focused on demographic and long-term outcome variables (including death, rejection, retransplantation, and infection). RESULTS: Thirty percent (111) of eligible patients (374) met the definition of successful early steroid withdrawal. Only male gender independently predicted successful withdrawal. Mortality, both short and long term, was significantly lower in patients in whom successful early withdrawal from corticosteroids was achieved than in patients in whom the early attempts failed (1.7% per year versus 4.7% per year; p < 0.0001). The prevalence of late acute allograft rejection (more than 1 year after transplantation) was lower in patients successfully withdrawn from steroid therapy early after transplantation (0.07 pt-yr of follow-up versus 0.15 pt-yr; p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis of the entire group identified incidence of infection (p = 0.001), older age (p = 0.001), failed early steroid withdrawal (p = 0.006), and female gender (p = 0.016) as independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Successful early corticosteroid withdrawal identifies a subgroup of "immunologically privileged" patients with a low risk for long-term mortality and is not associated with an increased prevalence of late rejection or clinically significant coronary artery disease.

The repetitive histologic pattern of vascular cardiac allograft rejection. Increased incidence associated with longer exposure to prophylactic murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3).

While vascular cardiac allograft rejection increases morbidity and mortality following transplantation, factors predisposing to its development have not been completely elucidated. To evaluate the influence of the duration of early rejection prophylaxis with the murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3) on the development of a repetitive histologic pattern of vascular cardiac allograft rejection, endomyocardial biopsies from 344 heart transplant recipients were prospectively evaluated. The influence of clinical characteristics was assessed. Eighty-three patients (24%) developed and 261 patients (76%) did not develop a repetitive histologic pattern of vascular cardiac allograft rejection. The vascular rejection pattern was more common in patients with a positive crossmatch (89% versus 11%, P<0.0001) and OKT3 sensitization (73% versus 27%, P<0.0001), and was positively correlated with the duration of OKT3 treatment (P<0.0001). The correlation persists even after excluding patients with a positive crossmatch or OKT3 sensitization. Patients developing a repetitive histologic pattern of vascular cardiac allograft rejection early after transplantation had decreased allograft survival (P=0.0008). The development of a repetitive histologic pattern of vascular cardiac allograft rejection is positively correlated with the duration of OKT3 treatment. Judicious use of OKT3 in early rejection prophylaxis in cardiac transplantation is warranted.

Long-term results of cardiac transplantation in patients older than sixty years. UTAH Cardiac Transplant Program.

Advanced age has traditionally been a contraindication to cardiac transplantation. We have, however, offered cardiac transplantation to patients older than 60 years with end-stage heart failure if they were otherwise acceptable candidates. From 1985 to 1994, 527 patients underwent cardiac transplantation. Among these patients, 101 were older than 60 years at transplantation. The mean follow-up of this group is 6 years. Patients older than 60 years had significantly fewer rejection episodes per patient than those who were younger than 60 years at transplantation (1.9 +/- 1.3 vs 2.6 +/- 1.8, p = 0.009). No difference in the number of infectious complications per patient was detected between the two groups. Both short-term and long-term survival after transplantation were significantly lower for patients who were older than 60 years at transplantation than for younger patients (p < 0.05). The 6-year actuarial survival after transplantation for patients older than 60 years was 54% compared with 72% for patients younger than 60 years at transplantation (p < 0.05). Patients older than 60 years at transplantation were more likely to die of infectious complications or malignant disease after transplantation (p < 0.05). We believe caution is warranted in offering cardiac transplantation to patients older than 60 years. This group of patients should be carefully observed for the development of potentially life-threatening infectious complications or new malignant tumors after transplantation.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in heart transplantation: rejection prevention and treatment.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), the morpholinoethylester of mycophenolic acid, inhibits the de novo pathway for purine synthesis. Evidence suggests that MMF suppresses lymphocyte function more than that of neutrophils, erythrocytes, and other rapidly dividing cell lines that can utilize salvage pathways for purine synthesis. While rigorous efficacy data await the completion of an ongoing, multicenter, prospectively randomized, placebo-controlled trial, long-term safety data are, however, available from numerous uncontrolled trials in cardiac transplantation. Dose-ranging trials in 49 heart recipients suggest that doses > or = 4000 mg/d are associated with significant, reversible gastrointestinal toxicity when compared with doses < 4000 mg/d (p < 0.001). Patients receiving > or = 1000 mg/d may have fewer rejection episodes. Even in the long term, changing from azathioprine to MMF is associated with increases in hematocrit (p < 0.001), total WBC count (p < 0.005), and absolute neutrophil count (p < 0.005). Successful use of MMF in refractory cardiac allograft rejection suggests an advantage over azathioprine. MMF is safe and appears to be at least as effective as azathioprine for immunosuppression following heart transplantation.