Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices.

OBJECTIVES: To review important patient safety practices for evidence of effectiveness, implementation, and adoption. DATA SOURCES: Searches of multiple computerized databases, gray literature, and the judgments of a 20-member panel of patient safety stakeholders. REVIEW METHODS: The judgments of the stakeholders were used to prioritize patient safety practices for review, and to select which practices received in-depth reviews and which received brief reviews. In-depth reviews consisted of a formal literature search, usually of multiple databases, and included gray literature, where applicable. In-depth reviews assessed practices on the following domains: • How important is the problem? • What is the patient safety practice? • Why should this practice work? • What are the beneficial effects of the practice? • What are the harms of the practice? • How has the practice been implemented, and in what contexts? • Are there any data about costs? • Are there data about the effect of context on effectiveness? We assessed individual studies for risk of bias using tools appropriate to specific study designs. We assessed the strength of evidence of effectiveness using a system developed for this project. Brief reviews had focused literature searches for focused questions. All practices were then summarized on the following domains: scope of the problem, strength of evidence for effectiveness, evidence on potential for harmful unintended consequences, estimate of costs, how much is known about implementation and how difficult the practice is to implement. Stakeholder judgment was then used to identify practices that were "strongly encouraged" for adoption, and those practices that were "encouraged" for adoption. RESULTS: From an initial list of over 100 patient safety practices, the stakeholders identified 41 practices as a priority for this review: 18 in-depth reviews and 23 brief reviews. Of these, 20 practices had their strength of evidence of effectiveness rated as at least "moderate," and 25 practices had at least "moderate" evidence of how to implement them. Ten practices were classified by the stakeholders as having sufficient evidence of effectiveness and implementation and should be "strongly encouraged" for adoption, and an additional 12 practices were classified as those that should be "encouraged" for adoption. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supporting the effectiveness of many patient safety practices has improved substantially over the past decade. Evidence about implementation and context has also improved, but continues to lag behind evidence of effectiveness. Twenty-two patient safety practices are sufficiently well understood, and health care providers can consider adopting them now.

High affinity binding of receptor-associated protein to heparin and low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein requires similar basic amino acid sequence motifs.

The 39-kDa receptor-associated protein (RAP) is a specialized chaperone for members of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene family, which also binds heparin. Previous studies have identified a triplicate repeat sequence within RAP that appears to exhibit differential functions. Here we generated a series of truncated and site-directed RAP mutants in order to define the sites within RAP that are important for interacting with heparin and low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP). We found that high affinity binding of RAP to heparin is mediated by the carboxyl-terminal repeat of RAP, whereas both the carboxyl-terminal repeat and a combination of amino and central repeats exhibit high affinity binding to LRP. Several motifs were found to mediate the binding of RAP to heparin, and each contained a cluster of basic amino acids; among them, an intact R(282)VSR(285)SR(287)EK(289) motif is required for high affinity binding of RAP to heparin, whereas two other motifs, R(203)LR(205)R(206) and R(314)ISR(317)AR(319), also contribute to this interaction. We also found that intact motifs of both R(203)LR(205)R(206) and R(282)VSR(285)SR(287)EK(289) are required for high affinity binding of RAP to LRP, with the third motif, R(314)ISR(317)AR(319), contributing little to RAP-LRP interaction. We conclude that electrostatic interactions likely contribute significantly in the binding of RAP to both heparin and LRP and that high affinity interaction with both heparin and LRP appears to require mostly overlapping sequence motifs within RAP.

ERD2 proteins mediate ER retention of the HNEL signal of LRP's receptor-associated protein (RAP).

The 39 kDa receptor-associated protein (RAP) is a receptor antagonist that interacts with several members of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene family. Upon binding to these receptors, RAP inhibits all ligand interactions with the receptors. Our recent studies have demonstrated that RAP is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) resident protein and an intracellular chaperone for the LDL receptor-related protein (LRP). The HNEL sequence at the carboxyl terminus of RAP represents a novel ER retention signal that shares homology with the well-characterized KDEL signal. In the present study, using immunoelectron microscopy we demonstrate that cells stably transfected with human growth hormone (GH) tagged with either KDEL (GH + KDEL) or HNEL (GH + HNEL) signals exhibit ER and cis-Golgi localization typical of ER-retained proteins. Overexpression of not only GH + HNEL but also GH + KDEL cDNA in transfected cells results in saturation of ER retention receptors and secretion of endogenous RAP indicating that the two signals interact with the same ER retention receptor(s). The role of RAP in the maturation of LRP is further supported by the observation that functional LRP is reduced about 60% as a result of decreased intracellular RAP. Pulse-chase labeling and immunolocalization studies of ERD2.1 and ERD2.2 proteins in transfected cells demonstrate a long half-life and Golgi localization for both receptors. Finally, overexpression of either ERD2.1 or ERD2.2 proteins significantly increases the capacity of cells to retain both KDEL and HNEL-containing proteins. Taken together, our results thus demonstrate that ERD2 proteins are capable of retaining the novel ER retention signal associated with RAP.

Receptor-associated protein is a folding chaperone for low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein.

The 39-kDa receptor-associated protein (RAP) is a receptor antagonist that inhibits ligand interactions with the receptors that belong to the low density lipoprotein receptor gene family. Our previous studies have demonstrated that RAP interacts with the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) within the endoplasmic reticulum and prevents premature interaction of ligands with the receptor. To analyze whether RAP is also involved in the folding of LRP during receptor biosynthesis, we generated anchor-free, soluble minireceptors that represent each of the four putative ligand-binding domains of LRP (SLRP1, -2, -3, and -4, corresponding to the clusters with 2, 8, 10, and 11 cysteine-rich complement-type repeats, respectively). When these SLRPs were overexpressed by cell transfection, only SLRP1 was secreted. Little or no secretion was observed for SLRP2, -3, and -4. However, when RAP cDNA was cotransfected with SLRP2, -3, and -4 cDNAs, each of these SLRPs was secreted. The cellular retention of SLRPs in the absence of RAP coexpression appeared to be a result of the formation of SDS-resistant, oligomeric aggregates observed under nonreducing conditions. Such oligomers of the SLRPs likely resulted from formation of intermolecular disulfide bonds since they were reduced to monomers when analyzed under reducing conditions. The oligomers were formed not only among molecules of a given SLRP, but also between different SLRPs. The role of RAP in the process of LRP folding was shown by the reduction in aggregated SLRP oligomers upon RAP coexpression. A similar role of RAP in preventing the aggregation of newly synthesized receptor was also observed using membrane-containing minireceptor of LRP. Coimmunoprecipitation and ligand binding studies demonstrated that RAP binds avidly to SLRP2, -3, and -4, but not to SLRP1. These results suggest that these interactions may be important for proper folding of LRP by ensuring the formation of proper intradomain, but not intermolecular or interdomain, disulfide bonds. Thus, our results strongly suggest that, in addition to the prevention of premature binding of ligands to LRP, RAP also plays an important role in receptor folding.