Tibial metaphyseal sleeves in primary total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy and tibial plateau fracture; preliminary mid-term survival and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO), and tibial plateau fractures (TPF) may cause problems in subsequent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to altered metaphyseal bone structure. Higher rates of loosening of the tibial component have been described. In post-HTO and TPF cases, a more durable fixation could be achieved by tibial sleeves. This study investigates the preliminary short-to-midterm clinical and radiographic results in a cohort of these cases. METHODS: A cohort of 28 patients was selected, 11 following HTO, and 17 following TPF. Standard clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed at 6 weeks, and one and two years. Revision with removal of primary prosthesis for any reason was the primary outcome. Patient reported pre- and postoperative pain, satisfaction and general health scores were collected at one and two years. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed for radiolucent lines. RESULTS: There were no cases of aseptic loosening. Survival for all reasons was 96.4% (CI 77.2%-99.5%). One progressive radiolucent line was seen. Numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain with and without weightbearing at 2-year follow-up improved from 8 to 3 and from 5 to 2 points respectively. Overall general health scores improved with a median of 70 at ≥ 2 years, compared to 63 pre-operatively. CONCLUSION: With no revision for aseptic loosening the use of tibial sleeves in primary TKA seems a safe and reliable method for fixation of the tibial component in metaphyseal bone with altered bone structure at short and mid-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, cohort study.

Arthrodesis of the knee following failed arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Primary stability in arthrodesis of the knee can be achieved by external fixation, intramedullary nailing or plate fixation. Each method has different features and results. We present a practical algorithm for arthrodesis of the knee following a failed (infected) arthroplasty, based on our own results and a literature review. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2010, patients were included with an indication for arthrodesis after failed (revision) arthroplasty of the knee. Patients were analyzed with respect to indication, fusion method and bone contact. End-point was solid fusion. RESULTS: Twenty-six arthrodeses were performed. Eighteen patients were treated because of an infected arthroplasty. In total, ten external fixators, ten intramedullary nails and six plate fixations were applied; solid fusion was achieved in 3/10, 8/10 and 3/6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is no definite answer as to which method is superior in performing an arthrodesis of the knee. Intramedullary nailing achieved the best fusion rates, but was used most in cases without--or cured--infection. Our data and the contemporary literature suggest that external fixation can be abandoned as standard fusion method, but can be of use following persisting infection. The Ilizarov circular external fixator, however, seems to render high fusion rates. Good patient selection and appropriate individual treatment are the key to a successful arthrodesis. Based upon these findings, a practical algorithm was developed.