ABSTRACT
In order to generate a machine learning algorithm (MLA) that can support ophthalmologists with the diagnosis of glaucoma, a carefully selected dataset that is based on clinically confirmed glaucoma patients as well as borderline cases (e.g., patients with suspected glaucoma) is required. The clinical annotation of datasets is usually performed at the expense of the data volume, which results in poorer algorithm performance. This study aimed to evaluate the application of an MLA for the automated classification of physiological optic discs (PODs), glaucomatous optic discs (GODs), and glaucoma-suspected optic discs (GSODs). Annotation of the data to the three groups was based on the diagnosis made in clinical practice by a glaucoma specialist. Color fundus photographs and 14 types of metadata (including visual field testing, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and cup-disc ratio) of 1168 eyes from 584 patients (POD = 321, GOD = 336, GSOD = 310) were used for the study. Machine learning (ML) was performed in the first step with the color fundus photographs only and in the second step with the images and metadata. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the classification of GSOD vs. GOD and POD vs. GOD were evaluated. Classification of GOD vs. GSOD and GOD vs. POD performed in the first step had AUCs of 0.84 and 0.88, respectively. By combining the images and metadata, the AUCs increased to 0.92 and 0.99, respectively. By combining images and metadata, excellent performance of the MLA can be achieved despite having only a small amount of data, thus supporting ophthalmologists with glaucoma diagnosis.
