Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Reprod Domest Anim ; 53(2): 534-544, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29399898

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of various abiotic factors, such as light, physical stress (pipetting) and thermal shock, on the quality of fresh and cooled equine sperm. In experiment I, four sperm aliquots were subjected to different light exposures: (i) protected control samples (CTRL), (ii) exposed to UV light at 10 cm (UV10), (iii) exposed to UV light at 20 cm (UV20) and (iv) exposed to laboratory lighting (LAB). In experiment II, four semen aliquots were subjected to repeated pipetting for 0, 10, 20 and 30 times (CTRL, P10, P20 and P30, respectively). In experiment III, four semen aliquots at 15°C were subjected to thermal oscillations: (i) cooled control sperm at 15°C (CTRL), (ii) oscillations of 1.9°C/min to a temperature of 30°C (T30), (iii) oscillations of 1.4°C/min, with the temperature rapidly falling until reaching 1.3°C (T0R) and (iv) oscillations of 1.1°C/min, with the temperature slowly falling until reaching 4.2°C (T0S). The results revealed that after 30 min, UV10 and UV20 sperm samples showed significantly (p < .05) lower total and progressive motility values, sperm kinematic parameters and mitochondrial potential. After 45 min of exposure, differences were highly significant (p < .001). No significant differences (p > .05) were found for pipetting or thermal oscillations. The results suggest that, even if equine sperm samples are not handled in the laboratory under optimal conditions, fresh and cooled equine spermatozoa are able to resist the impact of various abiotic stimuli without any reduction in their quality. This study analyses the effect on normospermic samples, but future research could look at the tolerance that asthenozoospermic equine samples have to these abiotic influences.


Subject(s)
Horses/physiology , Semen Preservation/veterinary , Spermatozoa/physiology , Spermatozoa/radiation effects , Animals , Light/adverse effects , Male , Sperm Motility/radiation effects , Spermatozoa/cytology , Stress, Physiological , Temperature , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects
2.
Cryobiology ; 80: 62-69, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29229561

ABSTRACT

There has been a lack of research into equine sperm vitrification to date, but studies of other species suggest it may have significant potential. To evaluate the impact of various cryoprotectant agents (CPA) and vitrification on equine sperm quality, a controlled study was carried out. A total of 12 ejaculates were subjected to exposure to CPA and vitrification. Sperm was diluted in a range of CPA: fresh, control (BSA), sucrose (0.15M, 0.3M and 0.5M), trehalose (0.15M, 0.3M and 0.5M) and the combination of sucrose and trehalose (M1: 0.15M sucrose+0.5M trehalose; M2: 0.5M sucrose+0.15M trehalose). Sperm motility, viability, acrosome integrity and DNA fragmentation were assessed at the time of CPA exposure and after vitrification. The exposure of spermatozoa to various concentrations of sucrose and/or trehalose significantly reduced sperm motility, with lower concentrations resulting in higher sperm motility. Sperm viability and DNA fragmentation did not vary after exposure to CPA, but acrosome integrity fell significantly when spermatozoa were exposed to CPA with high osmolality. When spermatozoa were vitrified, motility values were significantly higher than those obtained during the exposure. Low concentrations of sucrose (0.15M and 0.3M) and trehalose (0.15M) showed the best progressive sperm motility. The vitrification-warmed procedure significantly reduced sperm viability and acrosome integrity, but DNA did not vary with any of CPA used. Equine sperm vitrification demonstrates a low capacity for preserving sperm motility, and extenders containing trehalose or sucrose at lower concentrations are associated with a better protective effect on sperm motility. After vitrification, acrosome and plasma membranes were severely impaired, while the DNA structure was maintained. Equine spermatozoa partially recover the motility after vitrification, but there is a need for further studies into the preservation of sperm membranes.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation/methods , Cryoprotective Agents/pharmacology , Semen Preservation/methods , Sucrose/pharmacology , Trehalose/pharmacology , Vitrification/drug effects , Acrosome/drug effects , Animals , Cell Membrane/drug effects , Cryopreservation/veterinary , DNA Fragmentation/drug effects , Horses , Male , Semen Preservation/veterinary , Sperm Motility/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...