Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Low Extrem Wounds ; 23(1): 19-26, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37920918

ABSTRACT

This study aims to explore the effect in each stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). A total of 246 DM patients with diagnosed PAD were enrolled in this study. Of these, 86 patients (35%) died and 34 patients had non-fatal cardiovascular events occurred at the last 7 years follow-up. The baseline eGFR obtained from the first quantified eGFR value within 6 months from the date of enrollment estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI). Then, based on eGFR at entry, we defined CKD as an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and stratified all patients into four groups: eGFR-1, normal eGFR (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2); eGFR-2, mildly decreased eGFR (60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2); eGFR-3, moderately decreased eGFR (30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2); and eGFR-4, severely decreased eGFR (<30 mL/min/1.73 m2). The mean eGFR was 54.4 ± 28.9 mL/min/1.73m2, and more than 30% of all patients had CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2). The seven-year cumulative incidence of MACE was 29.8% (95% confident interval [95% CI] 15.5-35.7) for eGFR-1 group, 40.4% (95% CI 27.4-45.2) for eGFR-2group, 66.2% (95% CI 47.6-71.4) for eGFR-3 group, and 94% (95% CI 75.0-99.0) for eGFR-4 group. In addition, after adjustment, hazard ratio (HR) for MACE was 2.36 (95% CI 1.26-4.40) in the eGFR-3 group and 7.62 (95% CI 3.71-15.66) in the eGFR-4 group. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) for survival analysis was consistent with HR in this study. After adjusting confounders, relative to eGFR-1 group, an association between the eGFR group and MACE outcome was found only in eGFR-3 group and eGFR-4 group. The moderate to severe reduction in eGFR, was an independent risk factor for MACE among DM patients with PAD throughout a 7-year follow-up duration. Thus, early CKD screening might be essential in the management of diabetic patients with PAD.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models
2.
Int J Low Extrem Wounds ; : 15347346221104590, 2022 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35637546

ABSTRACT

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common cause of lower extremity wound. Consequently, PAD leads to a cause of leg amputation nowadays, especially in diabetic patients. In general practice (GP), confrontation with PAD prevention is a challenge. In general, ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement can be used as a PAD diagnostic tool, but this takes some time. The tool is not generally available and this need to train healthcare workers to perform. Multiple independent predictors developed the diagnostic prediction model known as clinical decision rules (CDRs) to identify patients with high-risk PAD. This might therefore limit the number of patients (only high-risk patients) to refer for ABI evaluation. This narrative review summarized existing CDRs for PAD.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...