Nonimage-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

We report the utility of office-based, nonimaged guided fine needle aspiration of palpable axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. We examine the sensitivity and specificity of this procedure, and examine factors associated with a positive fine needle aspiration biopsy result. Although the utility of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) of axillary lymph nodes is well established, there is little data on nonimage guided office-based FNA of palpable axillary lymphadenopathy. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of nonimage-guided FNA of axillary lymphadenopathy in patients presenting with breast cancer, and report factors associated with a positive FNA result. Retrospective study of 94 patients who underwent office-based FNA of palpable axillary lymph nodes between 2004 and 2008 was conducted. Cytology results were compared with pathology after axillary sentinel node or lymph node dissection. Nonimage-guided axillary FNA was 86% sensitive and 100% specific. On univariate analysis, patients with positive FNA cytology had larger breast tumors (p = 0.007), more pathologic positive lymph nodes (p < 0.0001), and were more likely to present with a palpable breast mass (p = 0.006) or with radiographic lymphadenopathy (p = 0.002). FNA-positive patients had an increased presence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001), higher stage of disease (p < 0.001), higher N stage (p < 0.0001), and higher rate of HER2/neu expression (p = 0.008). On multivariate analysis, radiographic lymphadenopathy (p = 0.03) and number of positive lymph nodes (p = 0.04) were associated with a positive FNA result. Nonimage-guided FNA of palpable axillary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer patients is an inexpensive, sensitive, and specific test. Prompt determination of lymph node positivity benefits select patients, permitting avoidance of axillary ultrasound, sentinel lymph node biopsy, or delay in receiving neoadjuvant therapy. This results in time and cost savings for the health care system, and expedites definitive management.

Patterns of axillary surgical care for breast cancer in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Population-based overall patterns of surgical management of the axilla in women with operable breast cancer during the era of adoption of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) were studied. METHODS: Women with operable breast carcinoma residing in 14 geographic areas of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries (1998-2004, n=239,661) were assessed for axillary surgical patterns of care. RESULTS: Use of SLNB increased from 11 to 59%. Use of no axillary surgery decreased from 14 to 6.6%. In pathologic node-negative women, use of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) decreased from 94 to 36%. Independent factors most associated with failure to receive SLNB included diagnosis year (2000: 62%; 2004: 29%), surgery (mastectomy: 64%; breast-conserving surgery: 36%), tumor size (T3: 71%; T2: 56%; T1: 40%), age (>or= 70 years: 50%; <70 years: 45%), grade (high: 42%; low: 38%), urbanity (non-large metropolitan area: 49%; large metropolitan area: 42%), and, by quartile, poverty (highest: 47%; lowest: 35%), and white-collar employment (lowest: 56%; highest: 47%). In pathologic node-positive women who had SLNB, failure to undergo completion ALND increased from 20% in 1998 to 32% in 2004. Patients with smaller, lower-grade tumors, and those with smaller size of nodal metastasis, lack of extracapsular extension, age >or= 70 years, increased linguistic isolation, African-American or Hispanic race/ethnicity, and white-collar employment were less likely to undergo completion ALND. CONCLUSIONS: Management of the axilla changed dramatically during the period of rapid adoption of SLNB. Patterns of care suggest both appropriate and inappropriate selection for SLNB and ALND.

Invasive anal squamous-cell carcinoma in the HIV-positive patient: outcome in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of invasive anal squamous-cell carcinoma in patients with HIV is increasing. We report the outcome after combined chemoradiotherapy for anal squamous-cell carcinoma in HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: Thirty-two HIV-positive patients treated at the St. Vincent's Cancer Care Center for anal squamous-cell carcinoma from 1997 through mid 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients also received highly active antiretroviral therapy. Treatment consisted of radiotherapy concurrent with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C in most patients. Overall survival, anal cancer-specific survival, local recurrence, and toxicity were assessed. RESULTS: Median time from completion of radiotherapy to last follow-up of surviving patients was 35 months. Five-year locoregional relapse, anal cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 16 , 75, and 65 percent, respectively. In multivariate analysis, locoregional recurrence, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were all significantly associated with tumor size. Overall survival was independently associated with high viral load and low CD4 count. Acute toxicity included: Grade 3 skin in 25 percent of patients, Grade 3 diarrhea: 28 percent, and Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity in 21 and 48 percent, respectively. More than two-thirds of patients required radiotherapy interruption. There was no negative impact of chemoradiotherapy on viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome after chemoradiotherapy for HIV-related anal squamous-cell carcinoma in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy is comparable to outcome in patients without HIV. However, significant toxicity is seen with standard treatment regimens. Earlier diagnosis and risk-adapted therapy could lead to improved survival and decreased treatment-related morbidity.

Multi-institutional experience using the MammoSite radiation therapy system in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer: 2-year results.

PURPOSE: To present a retrospective multi-institutional experience of patients treated with the MammoSite radiation therapy system (RTS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine institutions participated in a pooled analysis of data evaluating the clinical experience of the MammoSite RTS for delivering accelerated partial breast irradiation. Between 2000 and 2004, 483 patients were treated with the MammoSite RTS to 34 Gy delivered in 10 fractions. Treatment parameters were analyzed to identify factors affecting outcome. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24 months (minimum of 1 year). Overall, infection was documented in 9% of patients, but the rate was only 4.8% if the catheter was placed after lumpectomy. Six patients (1.2%) experienced an in-breast failure; four failures occurred remote from the lumpectomy site (elsewhere failure). Cosmetic results were good/excellent in 91% of patients. Treatment parameters identified as significant on univariate analysis were tested in multivariate regression analysis. The closed-cavity placement technique significantly reduced the risk of infection (p = 0.0267). A skin spacing of <6 mm increased the risk of severe acute skin reaction (p = 0.0178) and telangiectasia (p = 0.0280). The use of prophylactic antibiotics reduced the risk of severe acute skin reaction (p < 0.0001). The use of multiple dwell positions reduced the risk of severe hyperpigmentation (p = 0.0278). Infection was associated with an increased risk of fair or poor overall cosmesis (p = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of patients, the MammoSite RTS seems to have acceptable toxicity rates and cosmetic outcomes, comparable to those with whole-breast radiotherapy. On the basis of these data, the closed-cavity placement technique, use of prophylactic antibiotics, use of multiple dwell positions, and a minimum skin spacing of 6 mm seem to improve patient outcome.

Acute toxicity of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy with the MammoSite applicator in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intracavitary brachytherapy with the MammoSite applicator as the sole radiation treatment in breast-conserving therapy is an option for women with early-stage breast cancer; we evaluated the acute toxicities associated with this treatment method. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with 32 stage I or II breast carcinomas underwent breast-conserving therapy, which included lumpectomy with negative margins, sentinel node biopsy, or axillary dissection, followed by brachytherapy with the MammoSite applicator. Acute radiation skin complications were graded on the day of radiotherapy completion and at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12 after radiation treatment. Cosmesis was graded on the Harvard Scale at all follow-ups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 11 months (range, 4-15 months). Twenty-seven of the 31 patients were treated with the device as the sole method of radiotherapy. No acute toxicities occurred during the 5 days of treatment. Nineteen patients (68%) had no to mild acute skin reactions, and 25% developed bright erythema and patchy moist desquamation. Two patients (7%) developed confluent moist desquamation within the first 4 weeks (grade 3); this healed by week 12. All skin reactions were localized to the area overlying the balloon. Sixteen percent (5 of 32) of all breasts with implants developed infection. Cosmesis was good to excellent in 86% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Most acute skin toxicities were mild. Our infection rate was higher than in prior studies that used interstitial brachytherapy. Cosmesis was good to excellent in most patients. Breast brachytherapy with the MammoSite catheter was well tolerated; further investigations of breast brachytherapy with this system are warranted.

Leptomeningeal relapse of multiple myeloma following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Progressive multiple myeloma may manifest features of 'de-differentiation', including a plasmablastic appearance, failure to secrete paraprotein, extramedullary involvement, and resistance to treatment. A 44-year-old woman with kappa-light chain myeloma underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Twenty months later she developed paraspinal plasmablastic myeloma in the absence of paraprotein in urine or myeloma in the marrow. The paraspinal masses responded to chemotherapy. At 30 months she developed myelomatous meningitis, which proved resistant to intrathecal chemotherapy, irradiation, and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The leptomeningeal disease led to death at 38 months. This is the first report of leptomeningeal relapse of myeloma after allografting.

Use of postoperative radiotherapy for node-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

The appropriate patient selection for adjuvant radiotherapy after primary surgical therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear. Four thousand thirteen patients diagnosed from 1988-1995 in 9 registry areas of the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results program who received primary surgical therapy for pathologic stage T1-3 N1/2 M0 NSCLC were identified. County-level and patient-specific variables associated with the use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) were studied by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Prognostic factors for cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Cox multivariate analysis. Overall, 58% of node-positive patients received PORT. Use of PORT was independently associated with younger age, more advanced nodal disease, no prior cancer, less extensive surgery than pneumonectomy, and patient residence close to a radiotherapy facility. In multivariate analysis of the entire node-positive population, there were no differences in OS or CSS with the use of PORT. In the patients with N2 disease, PORT was associated with improved OS (5-year OS: 16% without PORT, 22% with PORT; P = 0.001) and CSS (5-year CSS: 25% without PORT, 30% with PORT; P = 0.02). Additionally, patients with = 4 nodes involved also had an improved survival in association with PORT (5-year OS: 11% without PORT, 18% with PORT; P = 0.001; 5-year CSS: 17% without PORT, 25% with PORT; P = 0.009). Therefore, recognizing the inherent limitations of a retrospective, registry-based analysis, patients with more advanced nodal disease appear to have an improved survival with the use of PORT.