Infections after pediatric ambulatory surgery: Incidence and risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of surgical site infections (SSIs) after pediatric ambulatory surgery. DESIGN: Observational cohort study with 60 days follow-up after surgery. SETTING: The study took place in 3 ambulatory surgical facilities (ASFs) and 1 hospital-based facility in a single pediatric healthcare network.ParticipantsChildren <18 years undergoing ambulatory surgery were included in the study. Of 19,777 eligible surgical encounters, 8,502 patients were enrolled. METHODS: Data were collected through parental interviews and from chart reviews. We assessed 2 outcomes: (1) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)-defined SSI and (2) evidence of possible infection using a definition developed for this study. RESULTS: We identified 21 NSHN SSIs for a rate of 2.5 SSIs per 1,000 surgical encounters: 2.9 per 1,000 at the hospital-based facility and 1.6 per 1,000 at the ASFs. After restricting the search to procedures completed at both facilities and adjustment for patient demographics, there was no difference in the risk of NHSN SSI between the 2 types of facilities (odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.3). Within 60 days after surgery, 404 surgical patients had some or strong evidence of possible infection obtained from parental interview and/or chart review (rate, 48 SSIs per 1,000 surgical encounters). Of 306 cases identified through parental interviews, 176 cases (57%) did not have chart documentation. In our multivariable analysis, older age and black race were associated with a reduced risk of possible infection. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of NHSN-defined SSI after pediatric ambulatory surgery was low, although a substantial additional burden of infectious morbidity related to surgery might not have been captured by standard surveillance strategies and definitions.

User Testing an Information Foraging Tool for Ambulatory Surgical Site Infection Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance for surgical site infections (SSIs) after ambulatory surgery in children requires a detailed manual chart review to assess criteria defined by the National Health and Safety Network (NHSN). Electronic health records (EHRs) impose an inefficient search process where infection preventionists must manually review every postsurgical encounter (< 30 days). Using text mining and business intelligence software, we developed an information foraging application, the SSI Workbench, to visually present which postsurgical encounters included SSI-related terms and synonyms, antibiotic, and culture orders. OBJECTIVE: This article compares the Workbench and EHR on four dimensions: (1) effectiveness, (2) efficiency, (3) workload, and (4) usability. METHODS: Comparative usability test of Workbench and EHR. Objective test metrics are time per case, encounters reviewed per case, time per encounter, and retrieval of information meeting NHSN definitions. Subjective measures are cognitive load using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Task Load Index (NASA TLX), and a questionnaire on system usability and utility. RESULTS: Eight infection preventionists participated in the test. There was no difference in effectiveness as subjects retrieved information from all cases, using both systems, to meet the NHSN criteria. There was no difference in efficiency in time per case between the Workbench and EHR (8.58 vs. 7.39 minutes, p = 0.36). However, with the Workbench subjects opened fewer encounters per case (3.0 vs. 7.5, p = 0.002), spent more time per encounter (2.23 vs. 0.92 minutes, p = 0.002), rated the Workbench lower in cognitive load (NASA TLX, 24 vs. 33, p = 0.02), and significantly higher in measures of usability. CONCLUSION: Compared with the EHR, the Workbench was more usable, short, and reduced cognitive load. In overall efficiency, the Workbench did not save time, but demonstrated a shift from between-encounter foraging to within-encounter foraging and was rated as significantly more efficient. Our results suggest that infection surveillance can be better supported by systems applying information foraging theory.

Observational trial of antibiotic-coated central venous catheters in critically ill pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSI) are among the most common and serious adverse events experienced by critically ill children. Randomized trials have demonstrated that the use of central venous catheters (CVC) coated with antiseptic solutions reduces rates of CABSI in adult patients; however, their efficacy in children has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of CABSI, rate of complications, and microbiology of infection in critically ill children treated with antibiotic-coated or noncoated CVC (NC-CVC). METHODS: A prospective observational trial was conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) during a 13-month period. A minocycline-rifampin-coated CVC (MR-CVC) or NC-CVC was placed by PICU physicians who nonpreferentially selected CVC type. RESULTS: We studied the outcomes associated with the first CVC placed in 225 patients, including 69 MR-CVC and 156 NC-CVC. Patients who received MR-CVC, as compared with NC-CVC, were similar in gender, age, and severity of illness at time of PICU admission. The incidence density of CABSI did not vary by catheter type [MR-CVC: 7.53 per 1000 catheter-days (95% confidence interval 2.05-19.17); NC-CVC: 8.64 CABSI per 1000 catheter-days (95% confidence interval 3.74-16.96)]. However, the median time to infection in children with MR-CVC was 3-fold longer than in children with NC-CVC [18 versus 5 days (P = 0.053)]. No difference was seen in the incidence of complications, including thrombosis and catheter site reaction, between MR- and NC-CVC. No significant difference was observed in the types of organisms recovered from patients with MR- and NC-CVC. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MR-CVC significantly delayed the onset of CABSI in PICU patients. Larger, randomized trials are needed to better define potential differences in the incidence of CABSI, rate of complications, and microbiology of infection among pediatric patients treated with antiseptic-coated CVC and NC-CVC.

Administrative data fail to accurately identify cases of healthcare-associated infection.

OBJECTIVE: Some policy makers have embraced public reporting of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) as a strategy for improving patient safety and reducing healthcare costs. We compared the accuracy of 2 methods of identifying cases of HAI: review of administrative data and targeted active surveillance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional prospective study was performed during a 9-month period in 2004 at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, a 418-bed academic pediatric hospital. "True HAI" cases were defined as those that met the definitions of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System and that were detected by a trained infection control professional on review of the medical record. We examined the sensitivity and the positive and negative predictive values of identifying HAI cases by review of administrative data and by targeted active surveillance. RESULTS: We found similar sensitivities for identification of HAI cases by review of administrative data (61%) and by targeted active surveillance (76%). However, the positive predictive value of identifying HAI cases by review of administrative data was poor (20%), whereas that of targeted active surveillance was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The positive predictive value of identifying HAI cases by targeted active surveillance is very high. Additional investigation is needed to define the optimal detection method for institutions that provide HAI data for comparative analysis.