Skin prick tests reveal stable and heritable reduction of allergenic potency of gene-silenced tomato fruits.

BACKGROUND: Today, for patients with food allergy, the only possibility to prevent allergic reactions is avoidance of the allergenic food. Genetic engineering of hypoallergenic plants by means of RNA interference (RNAi) could be an approach to improve the quality of life of subjects with food allergy. OBJECTIVES: We sought to achieve stable inhibition of expression of the allergenic nonspecific lipid transfer protein Lyc e 3 in tomato and to analyze the reduction of allergenicity in vitro by using histamine release assays and in vivo by using skin prick tests with transgenic tomato fruits. METHODS: Gene silencing was performed by means of RNAi and monitored by using Western blotting with nonspecific lipid transfer protein-specific antibodies and sera from patients with tomato allergy. Dose-dependent basophil histamine release assays, prick-to-prick skin testing, and determination of endogenous histamine content were performed with fruits harvested from plants of the first and second generation to assess the allergenic potency compared with that of wild-type fruits. RESULTS: We demonstrated that silencing of Lyc e 3 by means of RNAi contributes to reduced skin reactivity and is passed on to the next generation of fruits. A significant reduction of allergenic potency was determined in vitro and confirmed by using skin prick tests. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these results indicate that RNAi technology is an effective tool to generate foods with reduced allergenicity. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Allergen-reduced plant foods might allow reduction of dietary restrictions for patients allergic to panallergen families.

Germin-like protein Cit s 1 and profilin Cit s 2 are major allergens in orange (Citrus sinensis) fruits.

Oranges are clinically relevant allergenic foods. To date, orange allergens have not been characterized in detail. The study is aimed at analyzing the sensitization profile in orange-sensitized subjects with and without clinical allergy, and to identify orange allergens. Fifty-six sensitized subjects with self-reported reactions to orange were grouped into reactors (anaphylaxis or multiple episodes of immediate reactions and/or positive challenge tests) and non-reactors (negative open food challenge tests). Allergens were characterized by IgE immunoblotting, N-terminal sequencing, IgE-inhibition assays, and mediator release assays were performed to determine the allergenic potency of orange profilin. Of 56 subjects, 23 were classified as orange allergic showing mainly an oral allergy syndrome. Of 23 subjects classified as orange allergic, 22 were sensitized to profilin, Cit s 2. In patients with mono-sensitization to profilin in vitro histamine releases up to 75% from basophils were induced using orange extract and purified plant profilins. Of the allergic patients 78% were sensitized to germin-like protein, Cit s 1. Both allergens showed retained IgE reactivity in heat-processed orange juice. Interestingly, subjects with and without clinical allergy showed a comparable sensitization profile. Profilin and germin-like proteins are major orange allergens. The potential clinical relevance of orange profilin was indicated by its strong capacity to release histamine from basophils. However, a predominant sensitization to both allergens in subjects without symptoms also indicates a high frequency of clinically insignificant sensitization.

Strong allergenicity of Pru av 3, the lipid transfer protein from cherry, is related to high stability against thermal processing and digestion.

BACKGROUND: Nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) have been identified as major fruit allergens in patients from the Mediterranean area. Sensitization to nsLTPs is accompanied by severe reactions, possibly because of specific biophysical and biochemical properties of this allergen family. OBJECTIVE: To assess the protein stability and allergenic potency of nsLTP from fruits in comparison with birch pollen-related allergens from the same allergenic source. METHODS: Stability of natural and recombinant cherry allergens Pru av 3 (nsLTP), Pru av 1 (Bet v 1 homologue), and Pru av 4 (profilin) to pepsin digestion and to thermal processing and stability of allergens in skin prick test reagents was investigated by immunoblotting and/or circular dichroism spectroscopy. Moreover, allergenicity of processed and fresh fruits in regard to Pru av 1 and Pru av 3 was analyzed by histamine release assays. RESULTS: Lipid transfer proteins showed the highest resistance to digestion by pepsin (rPru av 3 > rPru av 1 > rPru av 4). Immunologically active Pru av 3 was detectable after 2 hours of digestion by pepsin, whereas IgE reactivity of Pru av 1 and Pru av 4 was abolished within less than 60 minutes. In contrast with Pru av 1, IgE reactivity to nsLTPs was not diminished in thermally processed fruits, and secondary structures of purified Pru av 3 were more resistant to heating. Moreover, nsLTPs were stable components in skin prick test reagents. Histamine release assays confirmed the strong allergenicity of nsLTPs, which was not affected by protease treatment or thermal processing of fruits. CONCLUSION: In contrast with birch pollen-related allergens, nsLTPs are highly stable to pepsin treatment and thermal processing and show higher allergenic potency. Therefore, nsLTPs have the potential to act as true food allergens, probably eliciting severe systemic reactions by reaching the intestinal mucosa in an intact and fully active form.

Biological activity of IgE specific for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of IgE specific for cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) has been a matter of controversy. Until now, no convincing experiments have been performed to test the biologic significance of individual multivalent allergens that carry multiple carbohydrate epitopes. OBJECTIVE: We sought to contribute to the understanding of the role of CCD-specific IgE antibodies and to study whether CCD-specific IgE antibodies are able to activate basophils using different multivalent glycoproteins as antigens. METHODS: Purified natural tomato beta-fructofuranosidase (nLyc e 2) and rLyc e 2.02 expressed in Escherichia coli were compared by means of histamine release tests. In addition, native and deglycosylated horseradish peroxidase and a neoglycoprotein consisting of a defined glycopeptide (Manalpha1-6[Xylbeta1-2]Manbeta1-4GlcNAcbeta1-4[Fucalpha1-3]GlcNAc) coupled to BSA were used in histamine release assays using stripped basophils from normal donors resensitized with IgE from CCD-reactive patients with food allergy to tomato. RESULTS: Ten CCD-positive and 2 CCD-negative sera from patients with tomato allergy underwent histamine release testing by using the glycoproteins and nonglycosylated controls as antigens, respectively. All sera induced histamine release with tomato extract (up to 100%), confirming the allergic status of the donors. Four of the CCD-positive sera induced releases ranging from 12% to 82% with all of the glycoproteins but not with the nonglycosylated or monovalent controls. All other sera showed no response or only very weak response to the glycoproteins. CONCLUSION: Approximately one third of the CCD-positive sera from patients with tomato allergy have biologically relevant CCD-specific IgE antibodies. Therefore the general claim that CCD-specific IgE is clinically irrelevant has to be reconsidered critically. Hence IgE specific for CCDs should be taken into consideration in the diagnosis and therapy of certain allergies. In the subgroup of patients sensitized to CCDs, the use of natural allergens should be preferred over the use of recombinant allergens expressed in prokaryotic organisms.