Reduced elimination of cyclosporine A in elderly (>65 years) kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Physiologic functions that may affect pharmacokinetics of drugs are altered in elderly patients. The current study was performed to elucidate the effect of age on cyclosporine A (CsA) pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients. METHOD: Twenty-five renal transplant recipients on CsA treatment were included in the study. CsA doses were adjusted by C2 monitoring. The patients were divided into two groups based on age; elderly: more than 65 years (n=11, mean 73 years) and younger: 18 to 64 years (n=14, mean 43 years). A full 12-hr pharmacokinetic profile was performed during stable phase. CsA whole blood and intracellular T-lymphocytes concentrations (first 6 hr) were measured. Genotyping of the CYP3A5*1/*3 and ABCB1 (C1236T, G2677T, C3435T) polymorphisms and quantification of whole blood mRNA ABCB1 expression were performed in all patients. RESULTS: Elderly patients achieved target C2 levels with lower CsA doses than the younger patients (4.3+/-0.8 vs. 6.1+/-2.1 mg/day/kg, P=0.025) because of lower clearance of CsA (22.7+/-5.1 vs. 30.5+/-11.1 L/hr, P=0.031). Elderly patients also showed 44% higher intracellular-to-whole blood CsA ratio than younger patients (P=0.02). Neither the CYP3A5*1, the ABCB1 genotypes nor mRNA ABCB1 expression revealed any significant influence on CsA pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION: The clearance of CsA decreased with increasing age. In addition, elderly patients had a significant larger proportion of the whole blood CsA concentration located at the site of action (within T lymphocytes). This indicates that in elderly recipients it might be safe to aim for an even lower whole blood target levels than current guidelines propose.

Declining intracellular T-lymphocyte concentration of cyclosporine a precedes acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: We investigated cyclosporine A (CsA) concentrations at the site of action, inside T-lymphocytes, to evaluate its applicability as a new supplementary therapeutic drug monitoring method after renal transplantation. METHOD: In this prospective single-center study, 20 kidney transplant recipients, mean age 54 (range 21-74) years, on CsA-based immunosuppression were included within 2 weeks posttransplant and followed for 3 months. Nine patients also had one full 12-hour pharmacokinetic profile performed. T-lymphocytes were isolated from 7 ml whole blood using Prepacyte and intracellular CsA concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography double mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: Seven patients (35%) experienced acute rejections (all biopsy verified) during the first three months posttransplantation. Intracellular CsA concentrations tended to decline 1 week prior to acute rejection and the decrease was significant (-27.1+/-14.6%, P=0.014) three days before the rejection episodes were recognized clinically. In addition, the intracellular CsA area under the curve 0-12 measured during stable phase was 182% higher in the rejection-free patients (P=0.004). There was no difference between patients experiencing rejection and the rejection-free patients with respect to CsA C2-levels, dose (mg/kg), human leukocyte antigen mismatch, donor age, recipient age, or ABCB1 genotyping. CONCLUSION: Intracellular CsA T-lymphocyte concentrations declined significantly 3 days prior to a rejection episode and there was a general lower intracellular exposure of CsA in recipients experiencing rejection. Intracellular measurement of CsA therefore seems to have a potential to further improve individualization of therapeutic drug monitoring. Larger studies are needed to elucidate the role for intracellular T-lymphocyte measurements in ordinary clinical care, for both CsA and other immunosuppressive drugs.