[Ventilation Patients between Acute Care and Long-term Out-of-Hospital Ventilation - Routine Documentation based Analysis of the Care Situation]. / Beatmungspatienten zwischen Akutversorgung und außerstationärer Langzeitbeatmung.

BACKGROUND: The number of invasive and non-invasive long-term out-of-hospital ventilations has been increasing rapidly for years. At the same time, there is poor information on the quality of care of out-of-hospital ventilated patients. The present investigation was conducted as part of the OVER-BEAS study. The aim of this study was to describe the care situation of weaning patients from admission to discharge from the weaning center using existing routine documentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, we included all patients admitted in 2018 via the weaning ward of the Thorax Center Münnerstadt. Descriptive analysis of routine data collected as part of quality management was performed. Data sources were the WeanNet database, the discharge letter of the weaning center, and the transfer report of the referring hospital. RESULTS: In the studied weaning center, 50.8 % of the patients (n = 31) could be completely weaned from the respirator and extubated or decannulated (category 3aI). If complete weaning was not successful, 75.0 % (n = 21) required the constant presence of specially trained staff or a specialist nurse in the further course. In this case, further care was mostly provided in inpatient care facilities (e. g., ventilator shared living community). CONCLUSION: Based on routine documentation, the care situation of weaning patients can be presented and compared with known data. In this way, the outcome quality of a weaning center can be made comparable.

[Ventilation Patients between Acute Care and Long-term Out-of-Hospital Ventilation - Routine Documentation based Analysis of the Care Situation]. / Beatmungspatienten zwischen Akutversorgung und außerstationärer Langzeitbeatmung.

BACKGROUND: The number of invasive and non-invasive long-term out-of-hospital ventilations has been increasing rapidly for years. At the same time, there is poor information on the quality of care of out-of-hospital ventilated patients. The present investigation was conducted as part of the OVER-BEAS study. The aim of this study was to describe the care situation of weaning patients from admission to discharge from the weaning center using existing routine documentation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, we included all patients admitted in 2018 via the weaning ward of the Thorax Center Münnerstadt. Descriptive analysis of routine data collected as part of quality management was performed. Data sources were the WeanNet database, the discharge letter of the weaning center, and the transfer report of the referring hospital. RESULTS: In the studied weaning center, 50.8 % of the patients (n = 31) could be completely weaned from the respirator and extubated or decannulated (category 3aI). If complete weaning was not successful, 75.0 % (n = 21) required the constant presence of specially trained staff or a specialist nurse in the further course. In this case, further care was mostly provided in inpatient care facilities (e. g., ventilator shared living community). CONCLUSION: Based on routine documentation, the care situation of weaning patients can be presented and compared with known data. In this way, the outcome quality of a weaning center can be made comparable.

[Patient perspective of pain assessment by nursing personnel : Qualitative cross-sectional study on use of the NRS]. / Pflegerisches Schmerzassessment aus Patientenperspektive : Qualitative Querschnittsuntersuchung zur Anwendung der NRS.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of pain as a part of adequate pain management is an integral part of the clinical routine. Much research has been carried out concerning use, relevance and validity of different assessment scales; however, patients' perspective of pain assessment has not yet been studied in Germany. The aim of the present study was to collate patients' experiences regarding pain assessment based on the numeric rating scale (NRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey was conducted as a qualitative cross-sectional study based on the grounded theory methodology by Strauss and Corbin. Interviews were carried out with 15 surgery patients. A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect data. The structured analysis was performed using MAXQDA. Data were first openly coded followed by thematic coding. Finally, the codes were compared and linked via axial coding. The data analysis was completed by object-related theory construction. RESULTS: Patients have only vague ideas about the consequences of their responses. They experience pain assessment as a nursing routine, which was perceived as being largely insignificant for therapy. On reflection patients sporadically saw the scaling as being a problem as a reference value is missing and the quality of pain as well as the procedure fail the predetermined measurement system. Metric values not only reflect the level of pain but are also intentionally used to enable targeted measures, e.g. discharge from hospital. CONCLUSION: The survey results indicate that the validity of the measurement and therefore the indicated therapy is influenced by subjective concepts. Patients themselves suggested alternatives for detecting the quality of pain. The data should be replicated in larger samples and also take possible influences on the perception of the assessment into account.

[Memorandum 'Development of health services research in Bavaria from the perspective of the Bavarian State Working Group 'Health Services Research (LAGeV)': status quo - potential - strategies']. / Memorandum "Weiterentwicklung der Gesundheitsversorgungsforschung in Bayern aus Sicht der Landesarbeitsgemeinschaft Gesundheitsversorgungsforschung: Status quo - Entwicklungspotenziale - Strategien".

The aim of the memorandum on the development of health services research (HSR) in Bavaria is to operationalise the global objectives of the State Working Group "Health Services Research" (LAGeV) and to collectively define future topics, specific implementation steps, methods as well as ways of working for the future course of the LAGeV. The LAGeV is an expert committee that integrates and links the competencies of different actors from science, politics and health care regarding HSR and facilitates their cooperation. The memorandum is based on an explorative survey among the LAGeV members, which identified the status quo of health services research in Bavaria, potential for development, important constraints, promoting factors, specific recommendations as well as future topics for the further development of HSR in Bavaria. From the perspective of the LAGeV members, the 12 most important future topics are: 1) Interface and networking research, 2) Innovative health care concepts, 3) Health care for multimorbid patients, 4)Health care for chronically ill patients, 5) Evaluation of innovations, processes and technologies, 6) Patient orientation and user focus, 7) Social and regional inequalities in health care, 8) Health care for mentally ill patients, 9) Indicators of health care quality, 10) Regional needs planning, 11) Practical effectiveness of HSR and 12) Scientific use of routine data. Potential for development of HSR in Bavaria lies a) in the promotion of networking and sustainable structures, b) the establishment of an HSR information platform that bundles information and results in regard to current topics and aims to facilitate cooperation as well as c) in the initiation of measures and projects. The latter ought to pinpoint health care challenges and make recommendations regarding the improvement of health care and its quality. The cooperation and networking structures that were established with the LAGeV should be continuously expanded and be used to work on priority topics in order to achieve the global objectives of the LAGeV.