Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
N Z Vet J ; 68(1): 60-64, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31433953

ABSTRACT

Aims: To compare urine urinary pH, blood pH and concentration of electrolytes in blood of healthy horses fed an anionic salt supplement to achieve diets with a dietary cation-anion difference (DCAD) of -40 or 0 mEq/kg DM, with horses a fed a diet with a DCAD of 85 mEq/kg DM.Methods: Eight healthy horses received each of three diets in a randomised crossover design. Diets consisted of grass hay and concentrate feed, with a varying amount of an anionic supplement to achieve a DCAD of 85 (control), 0 or -40 mEq/kg DM. They were fed for 14 days each with a washout period of 7 days between. Urine pH was measured daily and blood samples were collected on Days 0, 7 and 14 of each study period for the measurement of pH and concentration of electrolytes.Results: Four horses voluntarily consumed the anionic supplement with their feed, but four horses required oral supplement administration via dose syringe. During the study period mean urine pH was lower in horses fed diets with a DCAD of 0 (6.91; SD 0.04) and -40 (6.83; SD 0.04) mEq/kg DM compared to the control diet (7.30; SD 0.04). Compared with horses fed the control diet, mean urine pH was lower in horses fed the 0 and -40 mEq/kg DM diets on Days 1-12 and 14 (p < 0.05) of the study period. On Day 13 it was only lower in horses fed the -40 mEq/kg DM diet (p < 0.01). Urine pH was similar for horses fed the 0 and -40 mEq/kg DM diets (p = 0.151). The DCAD of the diet had no effect on blood pH, ionised Ca or anion gap. Mean concentrations of bicarbonate in blood were affected by diet (p = 0.049); they were lower when horses were fed the 0 mEq/kg diet relative to the control diet on Day 14.Conclusions and clinical relevance: The anionic supplement reduced urine pH in horses fed diets with a DCAD of 0 or -40 mEq/kg DM compared with 85 mEq/kg DM. However as urinary pH did not fall below pH 6.5, the pH below which calcium carbonate uroliths do not form, this reduction in urine pH is unlikely to be clinically significant. The supplement was variably palatable and showed minimal promise as an effective urinary acidifier at the doses administered in this study.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Anions/blood , Dietary Supplements , Electrolytes/blood , Horses/blood , Urinalysis/veterinary , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Anions/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Diet/veterinary , Electrolytes/administration & dosage , Female , Horses/urine , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Urine/chemistry
2.
J Vet Intern Med ; 32(3): 1185-1193, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29582480

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The original equine sepsis score provided a method of identifying foals with sepsis. New variables associated with sepsis have been evaluated, but the sepsis score has not been updated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of 2 updated sepsis scores and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria in regard to detecting sepsis in foals. ANIMALS: Two-hundred and seventy-three ill foals and 25 healthy control foals. METHODS: Historical, physical examination, and clinicopathologic findings were used to calculate the original sepsis score and 2 updated sepsis scores. SIRS criteria were also evaluated. Sepsis scores and positive SIRS scores were statistically compared to foals with sepsis. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-six foals were septic and 147 sick-nonseptic. The original and updated sepsis scores were significantly higher in septic foals as compared to sick-nonseptic and healthy foals. The sensitivity and specificity of the updated sepsis scores to predict sepsis were not significantly better than those of the original sepsis score. One-hundred and twenty-seven of 273 (46.5%) foals met the original SIRS criteria and 88/273 (32%) foals met the equine neonatal SIRS criteria. The original SIRS criteria had similar sensitivity and specificity for predicting sepsis as did the 3 sepsis scores in our study. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The updated sepsis scores did not provide improved ability in predicting sepsis. Fulfilling the original SIRS criteria provided similar sensitivity and specificity in predicting sepsis as the modified sepsis score and might serve as a diagnostic aid in identifying foals at risk for sepsis.


Subject(s)
Horse Diseases/diagnosis , Sepsis/veterinary , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/veterinary , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Female , Horse Diseases/classification , Horse Diseases/microbiology , Horses , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sepsis/classification , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/microbiology , Severity of Illness Index , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/classification , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/diagnosis , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...