Exploring the Value Added of a Guided, Silent Reading Intervention: Effects on Struggling Third-Grade Readers' Achievement.

The authors' purpose was to explore the effects of a supplementary, guided, silent reading intervention with 80 struggling third-grade readers who were retained at grade level as a result of poor performance on the reading portion of a criterion referenced state assessment. The students were distributed in 11 elementary schools in a large, urban school district in the state of Florida. A matched, quasi-experimental design was constructed using propensity scores for this study. Students in the guided, silent reading intervention, Reading Plus, evidenced higher, statistically significant mean scores on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test criterion assessment measure of reading at posttest. The effect size, favoring the guided, silent reading intervention group was large, 1 full standard deviation, when comparing the 2 comparison groups' mean posttest scores. As such, the results indicate a large advantage for providing struggling third-grade readers guided silent reading fluency practice in a computer-based practice environment. No significant difference was found between the treatment and control group on the Stanford Achievement Test-10 (SAT-10) posttest scores, although posttest scores for the treatment group trended higher than the control. After conducting a power analysis, it was determined that the sample size (n = 80) was too small to provide sufficient statistical power to detect a difference in third-grade students' SAT-10 scores.

Genomic imbalances in 61 renal cancers from the proximal tubulus detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has been applied to characterize 61 primary renal cell carcinomas derived histogenetically from the proximal tubulus. The tumor samples comprised 46 clear-cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs) and 15 papillary renal cell carcinomas (pRCCs). Changes in the copy number of entire chromosomes or subregions were detected in 56 tumors (92%). In ccRCCs, losses of chromosome 3 or 3p (63%); 14q (30%); 9 (26%); 1 and 6 or 6q (17% each); 4 and 8 or 8p (15% each); 22 (11%); 2 or 2q and 19 (9% each); 7q, 10, 16, 17p, 18, and Y (7% each); and 5, 11, 13, 15, and 21 (4% each) were detected. Most frequent genomic gains in ccRCC were found on chromosome 5 (63%); 7 (35%); 1 or 1q (33%); 2q (24%); 8 or 8q, 12, and 20 (20% each); 3q (17%); 16 (15%); 19 (13%); 6 and 17 or 17q (11% each); and 4, 10, 11, 21, and Y (9% each). In pRCCs, gains in the copy number of chromosomes 7 and 17 (7/15, each) and 16 and 20 (6/15, each) were frequent. One pRCC showed amplification of subchromosome regions 2q22-->q33, 16q, 17q and the entire X chromosome. In pRCC, losses were less frequently seen than gains. Losses of chromosomes 1, 14, 15, and Y (3/15 each) and 2, 4, 6, and 13 (2/15 each) were observed. In ccRCCs, statistical evaluation revealed significant correlations of chromosomal imbalances with tumor stage and grade, i.e., a gain in copy number of chromosome 5 correlated positively with low tumor grade, whereas a gain of chromosomes 10 and 17 correlated positively with high tumor grade. Furthermore, loss of chromosome 4 correlated positively with high tumor stage.

Complete karyotype characterization of the K562 cell line by combined application of G-banding, multiplex-fluorescence in situ hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and comparative genomic hybridization.

This study combines conventional cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiplex-FISH and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). In applying this multimodal approach on the human leukemia cell line K562, the chromosome composition was refined in detail and compared with data from the literature. A hypotriploid karyotype with a modal chromosome number of 67, and 21 unique marker chromosomes were identified. The classification of six markers was identical to published data and the composition of five further markers from the literature could be fully clarified for the first time. The composition of another five markers, which have been interpreted in divergent ways in different studies, were elucidated without doubt. Finally, five new markers of our study seem to have no equivalents in former studies, very likely due to limitations of conventional cytogenetics. The combinatory application of complementary techniques as shown in this study will be very useful to provide the basis of a refined genotype analysis on the chromosomal level.