ABSTRACT
Benthic communities in floodplain lake ecosystems are often exposed to varying levels of both food and toxicants. Inhibition through toxicants of sensitive species and stimulation through increased amounts of food of opportunistic species have been observed in separate studies. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the responses of benthic invertebrates to combined food and contamination input. Hence, seven floodplain lakes located along the River Waal, The Netherlands, with different levels of food (being either phytoplankton or macrophyte dominated) and toxicants were selected. The responses of the sensitive mayfly Ephoron virgo and the opportunistic midge Chironomus riparius to these sediments were assessed in 10-d growth bioassays with both species and a 28-d emergence experiment with C. riparius. A decrease in both survival and growth of E. virgo was observed with increasing contaminant levels. In contrast, C. riparius responded to the food quantity and quality in the sediments in spite of the toxicants present. Therefore, we conclude that the midge C. riparius is not a suitable test organism for the assessment of sediment toxicity. Alternatively, it proved to be an appropriate test organism to determine the nutritional value of sediments. The mayfly E. virgo turned out to be a much more appropriate test organism for sediment toxicity bioassays because it responds to the toxicant levels in the sediments rather than to the nutritional value. Our results demonstrate that the trophic state of an ecosystem (macrophyte or plankton dominated) influences the ecological risk of toxicants to benthic invertebrates in a species-specific way. It is concluded that not the toxicant load but the combination of food and contaminants determines the persistence of benthic invertebrates and therewith the benthic invertebrate composition in complexly polluted ecosystems.
