Comparative effects of ventricular resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with or without coronary artery disease.

UNLABELLED: In patients with advanced heart failure, intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), multisite cardiac pacing can be proposed as an additive treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of atrioventricular pacing according to the etiology of LVSD, by comparing the outcome of patients with and without coronary artery disease. Between August 1997 and November 1998, 103 patients were included in the InSync trial and received a biventricular pacemaker and a specifically designed left ventricular pacing lead. Baseline evaluation (12 lead ECG, New York Heart Association Class, quality of life (QOL) and distance walked during the 6 min walk test) was repeated in survival patients at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation. Patients were split in two groups, ischemic (N = 48) and non-ischemic (N = 55), according the result of a recent coronary angiography, the existence of coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass or the history of a prior myocardial infarction. RESULTS: The mortality rate was similar in the two groups with a mean 12 months actuarial survival rate of 78%. Nevertheless, the delay between the death and the pacemaker implantation was significantly higher in the non-ischemic group. A significant reduction in QRS duration and a significant improvement in NYHA class (-1.5). QOL score (-50%) and 6 min walking test (+18%) were observed similarly in the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that biventricular pacing improves significantly functional status of patients with LVSD, IVCD and advanced heart failure, regardless the etiology of the cardiomyopathy, ischemic or not, without over-mortality in ischemic patients.

[Medium-term results of multisite biventricular stimulation in severe cardiac failure]. / Effets à moyen terme de la stimulation multisite biventriculaire dans l'insuffisance cardiaque sévère.

Since its introduction in cardiac failure in 1994, biventricular cardiac stimulation has been widely applied with many clinical trials and the development of new specific technology. The authors present the results observed in the first 125 consecutively implanted patients at the Rennes University Hospital. After a mean follow-up of 22 months, the mortality rate was 40%. The causes of death were sudden death in 42% of patients, progression of cardiac failure in 34% and non-cardiac in 24%. The functional benefits of biventricular cardiac stimulation were seen through significant improvement in HYHA Class, 3.3 +/- 0.5 before implantation to 2.3 +/- 0.8 at the end of follow-up, and by a significant increase of 40% of peak VO2 and of maximal duration of exercise. With the learning curve and development of new technology, the left ventricular catheterisation via a coronary sinus vein, increased from 56% to over 95% during the last two years with an acceptable rate of complications. These results, with the reserve of not being a controlled trial, show the feasibility, safety and efficacy of biventricular cardiac stimulation in terms of functional benefit. Clinical trials are currently underway to assess the impact of this method on morbi-mortality and to assess the concept in association with ventricular defibrillation.