ABSTRACT
Background: The purpose of the study is to evaluate reoperation rate and its relationship to preoperative mechanical axis of rotating-hinge TKA used as the primary implant in complex knees. Methods: Patients subjected to primary TKA with a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis due to primary osteoarthritis between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative mechanical axis was measured using the last preoperative telemetry x-ray image. Preoperative axis was classified according to the type of deformity (varus or valgus) and its magnitude (0-15°, 16-25° or >25°). Reoperation rate (with or without implant removal) was the primary outcome of the current study. We studied if the preoperative mechanical axis (either varus-valgus, or magnitude of malalignment) was related to implant survival rate. Results: Forty-two patients were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 51.42 ± 31.88 months. The 83.3% of patients presented a valgus axis while the 16.7% presented a varus axis. Need of reoperation occurred in eight patients (19.0%). However, no patients (0%) required implant removal with revision TKA. No association was seen between the preoperative mechanical axis and risk of reoperation (p = 0.16). Conclusion: In selected situations that do not permit less constrained implants, primary rotating-hinge arthroplasty could be a good alternative. Risk of reoperation does not seem to depend upon the preoperative mechanical axis when using a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis for primary arthroplasty in non-tumoral complex knees.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgical management of patellar cartilage defects remains controversial. The ideal technique to regenerate hyaline cartilage is not yet defined. However, a synthetic resorbable osteochondral scaffold plug (TruFit CB) seems to offer a treatment option with good results at short-term follow-up, at least in the condylar setting. HYPOTHESIS: A synthetic implant provides a simple and efficacious means of treating the cartilage defects of the patellofemoral joint in young patients. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A study was designed to evaluate prospectively short- and medium-term results in patients with osteochondral patellar defects treated with synthetic reabsorbable scaffolds. Patient outcome scores (Short Form 36 [SF-36] and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]), demographics, prior surgeries, and data from a physical examination were collected at baseline (before implantation) and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Defect characteristics were collected during implantation. Diagnosis and monitoring were performed by magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Ten patients with a mean age of 33.3 years (range, 16-49 years) were evaluated prospectively at 24 months' follow-up. The number of plugs used for each patient ranged from 1 to 4. At 1-year follow-up, the results were satisfactory in 8 of 10 patients, and poor in 2, according to clinical assessment (KOOS, visual analog scale, and SF-36). At 18 months of follow-up, all patients except one complained of pain and knee swelling. Reoperation rate for implant failure at final follow-up was 70%. Magnetic resonance imaging at final follow-up showed a cylindrical cavity of fibrous tissue instead of subchondral bone restoration. CONCLUSION: A synthetic implant can improve symptoms and joint function, especially for small lesions, only for a short period of time. However, 2 years of monitoring has shown its failure in restoring the subchondral bone despite the formation of predominant hyaline cartilage from synthetic resorbable scaffolds. Under current conditions and according to our experience, we do not recommend TruFit synthetic implants for osteochondral patellar defects in active patients.
