Conciliación de la medicación en el alta desde la unidad de cuidados intensivos a la planta de hospitalización / Medication reconciliation for patients after their discharge from intensive care unit to the hospital ward

Objetivos : el objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si la transición del alta de la unidad de cuidados intensivos a la planta de hospitalización conlleva un alto riesgo de errores de conciliación. Se definió como objetivo principal del estudio describir y cuantificar las discrepancias y los errores de conciliación. Los objetivos secundarios incluyeron clasificar los errores de conciliación por tipo, grupo terapéutico de los medicamentos implicados y la gravedad potencial. Métodos: se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional retrospectivo de los pacientes dados de alta de la unidad de cuidados intensivos a la planta de hospitalización. Antes de que un paciente fuese dado de alta desde la unidad de cuidados intensivos, sus últimas prescripciones fueron comparadas con el listado de medicación propuesto en la planta de hospitalización. Las discrepancias entre ambos listados fueron clasificadas como discrepancias justificadas o errores de conciliación. Los errores de conciliación fueron clasificados por tipo de error, por gravedad potencial y por grupo terapéutico. Resultados: fueron conciliados 452 pacientes. Se encontró al menos una discrepancia en un 34,29% (155/452), y presentaba al menos un error de conciliación 18,14% (82/452). Los errores de conciliación más frecuentes fueron diferente dosis o vía de administración (31,79% [48/151]) y errores de omisión (31,79% [48/151]). Un 19,20% (29/151) involucraba a medicamentos de alto riesgo. Conclusiones: el alta desde la unidad de cuidados intensivos a la planta de hospitalización convencional es una transición asistencial que presenta alto riesgo de errores de conciliación. Los errores de conciliación ocurren con frecuencia, en ocasiones involucran a medicamentos de alto riesgo, su potencial gravedad puede requerir una monitorización adicional o producir daño temporal, y en algunos casos, más de un error de conciliación puede tener lugar. ... (AU)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether the transition of care from the intensive care unit to the ward would pose a high risk for reconciliation errors. The primary outcome of this study was to describe and quantify the discrepancies and reconciliation errors. Secondary outcomes included classification of the reconciliation errors by type of medication error, therapeutic group of the drugs involved and grade of potential severity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of reconciliated adult patients discharged from the Intensive Care Unit to the ward. Before a patient was discharged from the intensive care unit, their last intensive care unit’s prescriptions were compared with their proposed medication list in the ward. The discrepancies between these were classified as justified discrepancies or reconciliation errors. Reconciliation errors were classified by type of error, potential severity, and therapeutic group. Results: We found that 452 patients were reconciliated. At least one discrepancy was detected in 34.29% (155/452), and 18.14% (82/452) had at least one reconciliation errors. The most found error types were a different dose or administration route (31.79% [48/151]) and omission errors (31.79% [48/151]). High alert medication was involved in 19.20% of reconciliation errors (29/151). Conclusions: Our study shows that intensive care unit to non-intensive care unit transitions are high-risk processes for reconciliation error. They frequently occur and occasionally involve high alert medication, and their severity could require additional monitoring or cause temporary harm. Medication reconciliation can reduce reconciliation errors. (AU)

Medication reconciliation for patients after their discharge from intensive care unit to the hospital ward. / [Artículo traducido] Conciliación de la medicación en el alta desde la unidad de cuidados intensivos a la planta de hospitalización.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether the transition of care from the intensive care unit to the ward would pose a high risk for reconciliation errors. The primary outcome of this study was to describe and quantify the discrepancies and reconciliation errors. Secondary outcomes included classification of the reconciliation errors by type of medication error, therapeutic group of the drugs involved and grade of potential severity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of reconciliated adult patients discharged from the Intensive Care Unit to the ward. Before a patient was discharged from the intensive care unit, their last intensive care unit's prescriptions were compared with their proposed medication list in the ward. The discrepancies between these were classified as justified discrepancies or reconciliation errors. Reconciliation errors were classified by type of error, potential severity, and therapeutic group. RESULTS: We found that 452 patients were reconciliated. At least one discrepancy was detected in 34.29% (155/452), and 18.14% (82/452) had at least one reconciliation errors. The most found error types were a different dose or administration route (31.79% [48/151]) and omission errors (31.79% [48/151]). High alert medication was involved in 19.20% of reconciliation errors (29/151). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that intensive care unit to non-intensive care unit transitions are high-risk processes for reconciliation error. They frequently occur and occasionally involve high alert medication, and their severity could require additional monitoring or cause temporary harm. Medication reconciliation can reduce reconciliation errors.

Medication reconciliation for patients after their discharge from intensive care unit to the hospital ward.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether the transition of care from the intensive care unit to the ward would pose a high risk for reconciliation errors. The primary outcome of this study was to describe and quantify the discrepancies and reconciliation errors. Secondary outcomes included classification of the reconciliation errors by type of medication error, therapeutic group of the drugs involved and grade of potential severity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of reconciliated adult patients discharged from the Intensive Care Unit to the ward. Before a patient was discharged from the intensive care unit, their last intensive care unit's prescriptions were compared with their proposed medication list in the ward. The discrepancies between these were classified as justified discrepancies or reconciliation errors. Reconciliation errors were classified by type of error, potential severity, and therapeutic group. RESULTS: We found that 452 patients were reconciliated. At least one discrepancy was detected in 34.29% (155/452), and 18.14% (82/452) had at least one reconciliation errors. The most found error types were a different dose or administration route (31.79% (48/151)) and omission errors (31.79% (48/151)). High alert medication was involved in 19.20% of reconciliation errors (29/151). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that intensive care unit to non-intensive care unit transitions are high-risk processes for reconciliation error. They frequently occur and occasionally involve high alert medication, and their severity could require additional monitoring or cause temporary harm. Medication reconciliation can reduce reconciliation errors.