A streamlined three-dimensional volume estimation method accurately classifies prostate tumors by volume.

Prostate tumor volume has been suggested to be an important pathologic variable that predicts for clinical significance and outcome. However, the determination of tumor volume using standard methods such as computerized planimetry or image analysis is labor intensive. We studied whether length (L), width (W), and height (number of cross sections x sectional thickness, CST) of a tumor focus could be used to estimate prostate tumor volume. We studied 1091 tumor foci from 365 selected serially sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens. We randomly divided the specimens into evaluation (182 specimens) and validation (183 specimens) groups. After analyzing the evaluation group, we derived the formula 0.4 (slope of the regression line) x L x W x CST to estimate volume. We then tested whether our three-dimensional volume estimation formula could accurately classify tumor volume for specimens in the validation set as insignificant (0.5 cm3), and also into a five-category tumor volume scheme. Our three-dimensional estimate accurately classified tumors into insignificant and significant total volume categories in 94.0% of cases and into the five-category scheme in 85.8% cases. These accuracy rates were significantly better than rates for other methods. The three-dimensional estimate is an accurate and straightforward method for assessing prostate tumor volume.

Bcl-2 is significantly overexpressed in localized radio-recurrent prostate carcinoma, compared with localized radio-naive prostate carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We set out to determine whether patients who underwent prostatectomy for recurrence after external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer had a higher incidence of alterations in the apoptotic pathway than did patients who underwent surgery as initial treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent unsuccessful full-dose external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer and subsequently underwent salvage radical surgery (radio-recurrent group), and 20 patients matched for various clinical parameters who underwent only radical prostatectomy for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (radio-naive group), were studied. Tissue samples were examined for immunoreactivity for p53, p21, Bcl-2, and Ki-67 proteins. Statistically, the two groups were compared using exact logistic regression. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the tumors from patients initially treated with radiotherapy were noted to overexpress Bcl-2; whereas, in the radio-naive group, no patient had Bcl-2 overexpression (p = 0.0004). More patients who underwent salvage radical surgery were found to have a higher mean proliferative index (Ki-67 staining) (39.6%), compared with patients undergoing prostatectomy alone (22.1%), p = 0.0800. No significant difference was noted in immunohistochemical expression of p53 and p21 between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy after radiotherapy had a significantly higher rate of Bcl-2 overexpression than did patients who underwent surgery as the initial treatment. Alterations in the apoptotic pathway may be important in the development of local recurrence after radiation therapy.

Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone.

PURPOSE: We determine the effect of clinical and pathological variables on the outcome of patients with prostate cancer of Gleason scores 8 or greater treated with radical prostatectomy alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1987 and October 1998, 1,199 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. We identified 188 patients assigned a Gleason score of 8 or higher in the prostatectomy specimen who did not receive any neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Median followup was 60 months (range 1 to 129). Disease recurrence was defined as any detectable prostate specific antigen level 0.1 ng./ml. or greater. RESULTS: Of 188 patients 128 (68%) had no evidence of prostate cancer after a median followup of 60 months, while 60 (32%) demonstrated a detectable PSA level. There were 58 (31%) patients with disease confined to the prostate with negative surgical margins while 108 (57%) had prostate cancer confined to the surgical specimen. Positive surgical margin with extraprostatic extension was seen in 16 (9%) patients and seminal vesicle invasion was present in 40 (21%). The 5 and 7-year disease-free survival rates for the entire cohort were 71% and 55%, respectively. Patients with specimen confined disease had a significantly higher 5-year disease-free survival rate than those with nonspecimen confined disease (84% and 50%, p <0.0001). On multivariate analysis pathological status of the surgical specimen was the most significant independent predictor of disease recurrence. Age, ethnicity, clinical stage and preoperative PSA had no independent effect on disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term disease-free survival can be expected in those patients with high grade prostate cancer whose disease is confined to the prostate and/or the surgical specimen.