Viral load assay sensitivity and low level viremia in HAART treated HIV patients.

BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of highly sensitive viral load assays resulted in a significant increase in number of treated HIV-infected patients with a detectable viral load. The significance of a viral load between 20 and 50 copies/mL remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of three viral load assays, with special attention for specificity and sensitivity at the lowest level of quantification. STUDY DESIGN: Samples (n=181) were selected from 62 HIV-positive individuals that experience viral blips or episodes of low but detectable viremia under antiretroviral treatment, and from 216 HIV-negative individuals. Each sample was tested in at least two of three assays: the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor (CAP/CA), the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 1 (CAP/CTM1) and the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 2 (CAP/CTM2). RESULTS: No false positive results were recorded. Kappa statistics revealed fair to moderate agreement between the results of the three assays, but important differences in sensitivity were observed, with the highest sensitivity reported for CAP/CTM2 followed by CAP/CTM1 and CAP/CA. The differences in sensitivity remained after equalization of the detection limit for all assays at 50 copies/mL. Analysis of samples collected over time showed that patients with single blips in CAP/CA present with recurrent blips in CAP/CTM1 and persistent detectable viremia in CAP/CTM2. CONCLUSIONS: Viral load results between 20 and 50 copies/mL in either CAP/CTM1 or CAP/CTM2, indicate true viremia. The availability of highly sensitive assays force reconsideration of the terms 'undetectable' viral load and 'virological success' of antiretroviral treatment.

Effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy and development of drug resistance in HIV-1 infected patients in Mombasa, Kenya.

Access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is increasing in resource-limited settings (RLS) and can successfully reduce HIV-related morbidity and mortality. However, virologic failure and development of viral drug resistance can result in reduced treatment options and disease progression. Additionally, transmission of resistant virus, and particularly multi-drug resistance, could become a public health concern. This study evaluated treatment success and development of ART drug resistance after short-term treatment among patients attending the Comprehensive HIV Care Centre (CCC) of Coast Province General Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya. One hundred and fifty HIV-infected individuals receiving ART were consecutively recruited to participate in the study. After determination of plasma viral load, patients with detectable viral load levels were subjected to genotypic drug resistance testing. At the time of sampling, 132 of the 150 participants were on ART for more than 6 months (median 21 months, IQR = 12-26). An efficient viral load reduction to below 50 copies/ml was observed in 113 (85.6%) of them. Of the 19 patients with a detectable viral load, sequencing of the protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) gene was successful in 16. Eleven (11) of these 16 patients were infected with a subtype A1 virus. Major PR mutations were absent, but mutations associated with drug resistance in RT were detected in 14 of the 16 patients (87.5%). High-level resistance against at least 2 drugs of the ART regimen was observed in 9/14 (64.3%). The 3TC mutation M184V and the NNRTI mutation K103N were most frequent but also the multi-drug resistance Q151M and the broad NRTI cross-resistance K65R were observed. The results of this study revealed a high rate of treatment success after short term ART in patients treated at a public provincial hospital in a RLS. Nevertheless, the observed high risk of accumulation of resistance mutations among patients failing treatment and the selection of multi-drug resistance mutations in some, remains of great concern for future treatment options and potential transmission to partners.

Evaluation of two commercially available alternatives for HIV-1 viral load testing in resource-limited settings.

There is an urgent need for low-cost assays for HIV-1 quantitation to ensure adequate follow-up of HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited countries. Two low-cost viral load assays are evaluated, a reverse transcriptase activity assay (ExavirLoad v2, Cavidi) and a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay (Generic HIV viral load, Biocentric). Both tests were compared with the ultrasensitive HIV Amplicor Monitor assay. Samples were collected in Mombasa, Kenya, from 20 HIV-1 seronegative and 150 HIV-1 seropositive individuals of whom 50 received antiretroviral treatment (ART). The ExavirLoad and the Generic HIV viral load assay were performed in a local laboratory in Mombasa, the Amplicor Monitor assay (version 1.5, Roche Diagnostics) was performed in Ghent, Belgium. ExavirLoad and Generic HIV viral load reached a sensitivity of 98.3% and 100% and a specificity of 80.0% and 90.0%, respectively. Linear regression analyses revealed good correlations between the Amplicor Monitor and the Generic HIV viral load (r=0.935, p<0.001) with high accuracy (100.1%), good precision (5.5%) and a low percent similarity coefficient of variation (5.4%). Bland-Altman analysis found 95% of the samples within clinically acceptable limits of agreement (-1.19 to 0.87logcopies/ml). Although, the ExavirLoad also showed a good linear correlation with the Amplicor Monitor (r=0.901, p<0.001), a problem with false positive results was more significant. The cost per test remains relatively high (US$ 30 for ExavirLoad and US$ 20 for the Generic HIV viral load). Hence, false positive results and the need for an expensive PCR instrument for the Generic HIV viral load assays still limit the implementation of these tests in less equipped, less experienced laboratories.