Prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection in HBV serologically-negative South African HIV patients and retrospective evaluation of the clinical course of mono- and co-infection.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with undetectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has been reported in HIV patients, but the clinical significance is unknown. This study presents the prevalence of HBV DNA in HIV-positive patients negative for all HBV serological markers and a retrospective evaluation of the clinical course of mono- and co-infection. METHODS: Of 502 HIV-positive patients, 222 tested negative for HBsAg, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). An in-house real-time PCR targeting the HBV S-region was used to quantify HBV DNA. HBV isolates were genotyped. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of HBV DNA-positive and HBV DNA-negative patients were described. Treatment outcomes of patients at 6, 12, and 24 months after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) were summarized. RESULTS: HBV DNA was detected in 5.4% (12/222) of serologically negative patients. Mean HBV viral load was 5359.2 IU/ml (standard deviation (SD) ±12 768.27). Eleven HBV isolates belonged to genotype A and one to genotype C. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or clinical course between the HBV DNA-positive and HBV DNA-negative groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found 5.4% of the HBV serologically-negative HIV-positive patients had low levels of HBV DNA. There were no significant differences in clinical outcome between the mono- and co-infected groups.

HIV-HBV coinfection among South African patients receiving antiretroviral therapy.

There are approximately 33 million individuals with HIV infection worldwide. The majority of infections are in southern Africa where hepatitis B is also known to be endemic. As access to life-saving antiretroviral therapy (ART) increases, the possibility for hepatitis B treatment resistance increases because most ART regimens contain lamivudine. Patients coinfected with HBV are therefore receiving monotherapy for HBV infection, leading to possible HBV-resistant mutants and the concurrent public health effect thereof. Additional information is needed on the prevalence of HIV-HBV coinfection and treatment response to ART. We present a summary of the information available from South Africa to date.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in patients with isolated core antibody and HIV co-infection in an urban clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection in South Africa ranges from 4.8% to 17% using the standard marker surface antigen (hepatitis B surface antigen, HBsAg) for chronic active HBV infection. However, sensitive molecular techniques for detecting HBV DNA in serum can detect occult HBV infection. We report the first observational prospective study of occult HBV infection in HIV-positive people in South Africa. METHODS: Five hundred and two patients attending an urban hospital were screened for HBV using serological testing for HBsAg, core antibody (anti-HBc), and surface antibody (anti-HBs). DNA was analyzed using real-time quantitative PCR to determine the HBV viral load. RESULTS: Of the 502 participants, 24 (4.8%) were HBsAg-positive and 53 (10.6%) were positive for anti-HBc alone. Of these 53, screening for occult disease was carried out in 43, of whom 38 (88.4%) were positive. The mean HBV viral load was 2.8 x 10(4) copies/ml (range 1 x 10(2) to 1 x 10(6) copies/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Combining the participants with positive HBsAg and occult HBV DNA results, the prevalence of HBV increases from 4.8% (HBsAg alone) to 12.4%. While the clinical impact of occult HBV infection is unclear, consideration should be given to changing the guidelines to recommend dual HBV therapy for the treatment of co-infected patients in the developing world.

The prevalence of hepatitis B co-infection in a South African urban government HIV clinic.

OBJECTIVE: There are an estimated 350 million hepatitis B carriers worldwide. In South Africa the prevalence of mono-infection with hepatitis B has been estimated to range from 1% in urban areas to approximately 10% in rural areas. The exact prevalence of hepatitis B in the HIV-infected population has not been well established. Hepatitis B screening is not standard practice in government HIV clinics. Co-infection with hepatitis B and HIV can influence antiretroviral treatment and prognosis of both diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of hepatitis B/HIV coinfection. DESIGN: This is believed to be the first prospective observational report on the prevalence of hepatitis B/HIV co-infection in South Africa. Patients on whom hepatitis B serological tests could not have been done previously were recruited from an HIV clinic in a regional hospital in Johannesburg. Standard hepatitis B serological tests were performed. RESULTS: Five hundred and two participants were screened. The cohort's average age was 37 +/- 9 years and the average CD4 count was 128 cells/pi. Twenty-four (4.80%) were hepatitis B surface antigen positive. Nearly half (47%) of the participants showed some evidence of hepatitis B exposure. The risk of hepatitis B co-infection was not significantly different when analysed in terms of sex, race, CD4 count or age. Liver function tests were not a good predictor of hepatitis B infection. CONCLUSION: The rate of hepatitis B infection, as defined by hepatitis B surface antigen positivity in HIV-infected individuals in urban South Africa was 5 times the rate in people who were not HIV-infected. A 5% rate of hepatitis B/HIV co-infection is a reason to increase the accessibility of tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) for first-line treatment for this population.