Psychometric Properties and Predictive Value of a Screening Questionnaire for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Young Children With Down Syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in children with Down syndrome (DS) and is associated with adverse health and cognitive outcomes. Daytime clinical assessment is poorly predictive of OSA, so regular screening with sleep studies is recommended. However, sleep studies are costly and not available to all children worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and predictive value of a newly developed screening questionnaire for OSA in this population. METHODS: 202 children aged 6 months to 6th birthday with DS were recruited, of whom 188 completed cardio-respiratory sleep studies to generate an obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI). Parents completed the 14-item Down syndrome OSA screening questionnaire. Responses were screened, a factor analysis undertaken, internal consistency calculated and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves drawn to generate an area under the curve (AUC) to assess criterion related validity. RESULTS: Of 188 children who completed cardiorespiratory sleep studies; parents completed the screening questionnaire for 186. Of this study population 15.4% had moderate to severe OSA defined by an OAHI of ≥5/h. Sixty-three (33.9%) participants were excluded due to "unsure" responses or where questions were not answered. Using the remaining 123 questionnaires a four-factor solution was found, with the 1st factor representing breathing related symptoms, explaining a high proportion of the variance. Internal consistency was acceptable with a Cronbach alpha of 0.87. ROC curves for the total score generated an AUC statistic of 0.497 and for the breathing subscale an AUC of 0.603 for moderate to severe OSA. CONCLUSION: A well designed questionnaire with good psychometric properties had limited predictive value to screen for moderate to severe OSA in young children with DS. The use of a screening questionnaire is not recommended. Screening for OSA in this population requires objective sleep study measures.

Evaluating a nurse-led sleep support intervention to reduce melatonin prescribing in children and young people.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance, often arising from the way parents manage their child's sleep, affects 40% of children and leads to increased demand on clinical services. Children and young people with significant sleep issues can be treated effectively with a supportive approach but are often prescribed the hormone melatonin because of a lack of available support services. AIM: To understand the effect and clinical implications of a nurse-led sleep support clinic on melatonin prescribing in children and young people. METHOD: A retrospective case note evaluation was undertaken of a nurse-led sleep support service delivering a bespoke programme and follow-up support to a patient group of 124 children and young people, 104 of whom had co-morbidities. RESULTS: A total of 78 (63%) patients were successfully discharged without melatonin prescriptions after a median of two face-to-face clinic visits and three telephone calls. Eleven out of 12 patients had not restarted melatonin after 12 months. CONCLUSION: A nurse-led, non-pharmacological approach to sleep support in children and young people can provide an effective, sustainable alternative to melatonin prescribing. The authors recommend that appropriate sleep support should be administered and the response reviewed before melatonin is prescribed. Investment in sleep services to support this approach is important.

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Contributes to Executive Function Impairment in Young Children with Down Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Children with Down syndrome (DS) commonly experience difficulties with executive function (EF). They are also vulnerable to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). OSA is associated with EF deficits in typically developing children. A recent study reported an association between OSA and cognitive deficits in 38 school-aged children with DS. We experimentally investigated EF behaviours in young children with DS, and their association with OSA. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Children with DS were recruited to take part in a larger study of OSA (N = 202). Parents of 80 children (50 male) aged 36 to 71 months (M = 56.90, SD = 10.19 months) completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). Of these 80 children, 69 were also successfully studied overnight with domiciliary cardiorespiratory polygraphy to diagnose OSA. RESULTS: Obstructive apnoea/hypopnoea index was in the normal range (0-1.49/h) for 28 children but indicated OSA (≥1.5/h) in 41 children. Consistent with previous research, we found a large effect for children experiencing particular weaknesses in working memory, planning and organising, whilst emotional control was a relative strength. OSA was associated with poorer working memory (ß = .23, R2 = .05, p = .025), emotional control (ß = .20, R2 = .04, p = .047) and shifting (ß = .24, R2 = .06, p = .023). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that known EF difficulties in DS are already evident at this young age. Children with DS already have limited cognitive reserve and can ill afford additional EF deficit associated with OSA. OSA is amenable to treatment and should be actively treated in these children to promote optimal cognitive development.

Pilot study of an integrated model of sleep support for children: a before and after evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the success of behavioural sleep support interventions in the third sector, sleep support is not universally available for families in the UK. The aim of the study was to provide evidence of efficacy and to propose a delivery model for integrated sleep support for families of vulnerable children. DESIGN AND SETTING: A sleep support intervention was carried out in Sheffield Local Authority evaluated using a preintervention and postintervention study design by Sheffield Children's National Health Service (NHS) Trust. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six children aged 6-16 years with significant sleep problems were recruited; 39 completed the intervention and evaluation. INTERVENTIONS: Basic sleep education and an individualised programme was delivered by a sleep practitioner. Follow-on telephone support was provided to empower the parent (and/or young person) to carry out the sleep programme at home. An integrated NHS and Local Authority delivery model was designed and implemented. RESULTS: Parents' ratings of their child's ability to self-settle improved from 1.1/10 to 6.4/10 (p<0.05). Mean Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale scores improved significantly for parents/carers (MD 5.16, 95%CIs 2.62 to 7.69, p<0.05). Children who completed the intervention gained on average an extra 2.4 hours sleep a night. There was reduction in healthcare utilisation, illnesses and medication use. CONCLUSIONS: The behavioural approach to sleep support for these vulnerable groups of children is highly effective. Follow-on individual support to empower parents is key to achieving success. Sleep support can be implemented in NHS and Local Authority services by integration into the existing workforce using a cross-agency model.

Sleep in infants and toddlers with Down syndrome compared to typically developing peers: looking beyond snoring.

AIMS: To compare sleep in infants and toddlers with Down syndrome (DS) to typically developing controls, including differences in snoring and sleep ecology (sleep setting and parent behaviors). METHODS: Parents of 104 children with DS and 489 controls aged 6-36 months completed the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire (BISQ). We explored group differences, controlling for demographic variables. RESULTS: Parents of children with DS reported more sleep problems (45% v 19%), snoring (19% vs 2%), room-sharing (37% vs 17%), as well as less night-time sleep (55 mins) and total sleep over 24 h (38 mins). They were more likely to be present when their child fell asleep (OR 4.40). Snoring increased night waking but did not limit night-time/24-hour sleep. However, parental presence was associated with 55 min less night-time and 64 min less 24-hour sleep. After controlling for snoring and parental presence, children with DS slept less at night (38 mins) but more during the day (21 mins) with no significant difference in 24-hour sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, significant differences in sleep patterns, problems, and ecology were found between children with DS and controls. Parental presence at settling, not snoring, explained most differences, including over an hour's less 24-hour sleep. Early intervention programmes that promote self-soothing skills could prevent the burden of sleep loss in young children with DS.

Cardiorespiratory sleep studies at home: experience in research and clinical cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success rates of home cardiorespiratory polygraphy in children under investigation for sleep-disordered breathing and parent perspectives on equipment use at home. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Sheffield, Evelina London and Southampton Children's Hospitals. PATIENTS: Data are reported for 194 research participants with Down syndrome, aged 0.5-5.9 years across the three centres and 61 clinical patients aged 0.4-19.5 years from one centre, all of whom had home cardiorespiratory polygraphy including respiratory movements, nasal pressure flow, pulse oximetry, body position and motion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of home cardiorespiratory studies successfully acquiring ≥4 hours of artefact-free data at the first attempt. Parental report of ease of use of equipment and preparedness to repeat home diagnostics in the future. RESULTS: 143/194 (74%; 95% CI 67% to 79%) of research participants and 50/61 (82%; 95% CI 71% to 90%) of clinical patients had successful home cardiorespiratory polygraphy at the first attempt. Some children required multiple attempts to achieve a successful study. Overall, this equated to 1.3 studies per research participant and 1.2 studies per clinical child. The median artefact-free sleep time for successful research studies was 515 min (range 261-673) and for clinical studies 442 min (range 291-583). 84% of research and 87% of clinical parents expressed willingness to repeat home cardiorespiratory polygraphy in the future. 67% of research parents found the equipment 'easy or okay' to use, while 64% of clinical parents reported it as 'easy' or 'very easy'. CONCLUSIONS: Home cardiorespiratory polygraphy offers an acceptable approach to the assessment of sleep-disordered breathing in children.

Home oximetry to screen for obstructive sleep apnoea in Down syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Children with Down syndrome are at high risk of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and screening is recommended. Diagnosis of OSA should be confirmed with multichannel sleep studies. We aimed to determine whether home pulse oximetry (HPO) discriminates children at high risk of OSA, who need further diagnostic multichannel sleep studies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional prospective study in a training sample recruited through three UK centres. Validation sample used single-centre retrospective analysis of clinical data. PATIENTS: Children with Down syndrome aged 0.5-6 years. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic multichannel sleep study and HPO. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of HPO to predict moderate-to-severe OSA. RESULTS: 161/202 children with Down syndrome met quality criteria for inclusion and 25 had OSA. In this training sample, the best HPO parameter predictors of OSA were the delta 12 s index >0.555 (sensitivity 92%, specificity 65%) and 3% oxyhaemoglobin (SpO2) desaturation index (3% ODI)>6.15 dips/hour (sensitivity 92%, specificity 63%). Combining variables (delta 12 s index, 3% ODI, mean and minimum SpO2) achieved sensitivity of 96% but reduced specificity to 52%. All predictors retained or improved sensitivity in a clinical validation sample of 50 children with variable loss of specificity, best overall was the delta 12 s index, a measure of baseline SpO2 variability (sensitivity 92%; specificity 63%). CONCLUSIONS: HPO screening could halve the number of children with Down syndrome needing multichannel sleep studies and reduce the burden on children, families and health services alike. This approach offers a practical universal screening approach for OSA in Down syndrome that is accessible to the non-specialist paediatrician.

Prevalence and predictors of obstructive sleep apnoea in young children with Down syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Children with Down syndrome (DS) are vulnerable to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) because of their unique craniofacial anatomy and hypotonia. Understanding the predictors of OSA in DS may enable targeted screening. METHODS: Children with DS (n = 202) aged from six months to below six years (110 boys) were recruited from three UK children's hospitals. The clinical assessment included height, weight and tonsillar size. The parents either set up cardiorespiratory polygraphy at home or chose laboratory studies. Studies with less than four hours of interpretable data were repeated where possible. American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) 2012 scoring criteria were used to derive an obstructive apnoea/hypopnoea index (OAHI). Predictors of moderate to severe OSA were examined. RESULTS: In total, 188/202 (93%) participants were successfully studied. Of these, 169 studies were completed at home and 19 in a sleep laboratory. Moderate to severe OSA, defined by an OAHI of >5/h, was found in 14% and mild to moderate OSA (1/h≥OAHI <5/h) was found in 59% of the children. Male gender and habitual snoring predicted OSA but did not have independent predictive power in the presence of the other factors. Age in months, body mass index (BMI) centile and tonsillar size did not predict OSA. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe OSA is common in very young children with DS. Examination of tonsillar size did not predict OSA severity. Population-based screening for OSA is recommended in these children, and domiciliary cardiorespiratory polygraphy is an acceptable screening approach. Further research is required to understand the natural history, associated morbidity, optimal screening methodology and treatment modality for OSA in these children.