Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Med Ethics ; 45(8): 497-503, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31331951

ABSTRACT

Following the recent condemnation of the National Health Service charging regulations by medical colleges and the UK Faculty of Public Health, we demonstrate that through enactment of this policy, the medical profession is betraying its core ethical principles. Through dissection of the policy using Beauchamp and Childress' framework, a disrespect for autonomy becomes evident in the operationalisation of the charging regulations, just as a disregard for confidentiality was apparent in the data sharing Memorandum of Understanding. Negative consequences of the regulations are documented to highlight their importance for clinical decision makers under the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. Exploration of the principle of justice illuminates the core differentiation between the border-bound duties of the State and borderless duties of the clinician, exposing a fundamental tension.


Subject(s)
Eligibility Determination/ethics , Emigration and Immigration , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Social Justice/ethics , State Medicine , Beneficence , Case-Control Studies , Decision Making , Eligibility Determination/legislation & jurisprudence , Emigration and Immigration/legislation & jurisprudence , Emigration and Immigration/statistics & numerical data , Government Regulation , Health Services Accessibility/ethics , History, 20th Century , Humans , Moral Obligations , Personal Autonomy , Physician-Patient Relations , Social Welfare , State Medicine/ethics , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Vulnerable Populations/ethnology , West Indies/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...