Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res ; 18(4): 379-385, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38250235

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the thickness profile and the endothelial cell density (ECD) of donated corneas maintained in Optisol-GS with those preserved in Sinasol over seven days. Methods: Twenty paired donor corneas were received from the Central Eye Bank of Iran. After recording the osmolarity of each medium, one of each of the cornea pairs was preserved in either Optisol-GS or Sinasol media. Then, slit-lamp biomicroscopy and specular microscopic examinations were performed at the baseline and on day seven. Visante optical coherence tomography (V-OCT) was also performed at 1 hour (h), 24h, 72h, and one week post-preservation. The specular microscopic and V-OCT values were then compared between the two groups. Results: The mean osmolarity of the Sinasol group was significantly less than the Optisol-GS group (296 vs. 366 mOsm/L, P = 0.0008). The mean central corneal thickness at the measurement points was comparable between the two groups. However, the increase of thickness one week post-preservation in the Sinasol group was remarkably lower than those in the Optisol-GS group (P = 0.027). The mean ECD was comparable between the groups at the baseline and on day seven. However, the mean change of ECD from baseline to day seven was considerably higher in the Optisol-GS group than in the Sinasol group (P = 0.019). Conclusion: Corneal storage in Sinasol over seven days provides better and superior maintenance and preservation of corneal tissue deturgescence and a lower rate of ECD loss over Optisol-GS.

2.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 22(4): 563-574, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33937957

ABSTRACT

To compare ex vivo results of donor corneas maintained in Sinasol with those stored in Optisol-GS and reporting clinical outcomes of grafted Sinasol-versus Optisol-GS-stored corneas. In phase I, paired donor corneas were maintained in Sinasol or Optisol-GS. Afterward, the corneas were subjected to slit-lamp biomicroscopic and specular microscopic examinations on days 1 and 7, and then to trypan blue staining on day 7. The same examinations were performed on the corneas that were kept in Sinasol or Optisol-GS for 14 days. In phase II, the post-operative reports of 72 consecutive corneal transplantations were recorded using Sinasol- or Optisol-GS-preserved corneas. In phase I, 128 corneas from 64 donors and 59 corneas from 33 donors were investigated for 7 and 14 days, respectively. The EC indices were comparable between the groups at the measurement periods. The EC losses over 7 and 14 days were 3.7% and 19.9% in Sinasol against 4.6% and 20.8% in Optisol-GS. Although fair quality corneas were more common in Optisol-GS group after 7 (P = 0.04) and 14 days (P = 0.034), changes of stromal edema, Descemet's fold, and other quality ratings during 14 days were not different between the groups. In phase II, all the transplanted corneas were postoperatively clear with no adverse reactions. The overall results indicate that Sinasol is a safe, effective, and affordable intermediate cold storage medium for preservation of corneas.


Subject(s)
Organ Preservation Solutions , Chondroitin Sulfates , Complex Mixtures , Cornea/surgery , Culture Media, Serum-Free , Dextrans , Endothelium, Corneal , Gentamicins , Humans , Organ Preservation , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...