The value of serum total oxidant to the antioxidant ratio as a biomarker of knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The balance between oxidants and antioxidants is known as oxidative balance, which is impaired in many disease conditions such as osteoarthritis (OA). In this study, we aimed to evaluate this balance in OA patients through the evaluation of the oxidant to the antioxidant ratio. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 62 knee OA patients and 20 age, sex, and BMI-matched healthy controls were included in this cross-sectional study. Serum total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were evaluated using the oxidation-reduction colorimetric assay. The TOS to TAC ratio (TOS/TAC) was evaluated as an estimate of the oxidant to antioxidant balance. RESULTS: The mean TOS was 14.2 ± 2 µM in the healthy controls and 23.3 ± 7 µM in the OA patients (p < 0.001). The mean TAC was 38.8 ± 6.6 µM in the healthy subjects and 35.8 ± 12 µM in the OA patients (p = 0.33). The mean TOS/TAC was 0.38 ± 0.09 in the healthy subjects and 0.72 ± 0.3 in the OA patients (p < 0.0001). TOS/TAC value was capable of distinguishing OA patients from healthy controls with the sensitivity and specificity of 87.1% and 80%, respectively (p < 0.001). At the cutoff value of 0.46, positive TOS/TAC (>0.46) was identified in 100% of grade I patients, whereas it was negative in 27.3%, 16.7%, and 16.7% of grades II, III, and IV, respectively (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: In the knee OA, an equation of the serum TOS to TAC could be a good representative of oxidative balance than each component individually.

Short to Mid-term Outcomes of Single-stage Reconstruction of Multiligament Knee Injury.

BACKGROUND: Multiligament knee injury (MLKI) is a complex orthopedic injury leading to the tear of at least two of the major knee ligaments. However, there is no consensus on the optimal management of this debilitating condition. Regarding this, the present study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of single-stage multiligament reconstruction surgery in patients with MLKI. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 41 consecutive MLKI patients who underwent surgical reconstruction. Objective evaluation of the outcome included active extension and flexion. Furthermore, the subjective evaluation of the outcome was accomplished using the Lysholm scoring scale and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form in Persian. Postoperative complications were also recorded for all patients. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 31.95±7.82 years. In addition, the mean follow-up period and the mean time interval between the injury and surgery were recorded as 36.9±17.8 and 11.5±8.9 months, respectively. The mean Lysholm and IKDC scores were obtained as 86.9±11.5 and 70±18.7, respectively. The mean Lysholm and IKDC scores were not statistically different between the patients who underwent surgery less than 6 months after the injury and those subjected to reconstruction 6 months postinjury (P=0.07 and P=0.3, respectively). Seven patients showed postoperative restricted range of motion, which was resolved with physiotherapy. The only surgical complication was popliteal artery injury. CONCLUSION: As the findings indicated, the single-stage reconstruction of MLKI provided an acceptable outcome. However, several aspects of this reconstruction, such as the timing of the surgery, still remain to be resolved in future investigations.

Clinical instability of the knee and functional differences following tibial plateau fractures versus distal femoral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the knee account for about 6% of all trauma admissions. While its management is mostly focused on fracture treatment, it is not the only factor that defines the final outcome. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to study objective and subjective outcomes after proximal tibial versus distal femoral fractures in terms of knee instability and health-related quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional, cohort study was carried out on 80 patients with either isolated proximal tibial (n = 42) or distal femoral (n = 38) fractures, who underwent open reduction and internal fixation. All the fractures were classified based on the Schatzker and AO classification for tibial plateau and distal femoral fractures, respectively. The patients were followed and examined by an orthopedic knee surgeon for clinical assessment of knee instability. In their last follow-up visit, these patients completed a Lysholm knee score and the short-form (SF) 36 health survey. RESULTS: Among the 42 tibial plateau fractures, 25% were classified as Schatzker type 2. Of the 38 distal femoral fractures, we did not find any type B1 or B3 fractures. The overall prevalence of anterior and posterior instability was 42% and 20%, respectively. Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) and Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL) injuries were detected clinically in 50% and 28%, respectively. The incidence rates of ligament injuries in tibial plateau fractures were as follows: Anterior Collateral Ligament (ACL) 26%, Posterior Collateral Ligament (PCL) 7%, MCL 24%, and LCL 14%. Medial collateral ligament injury was the most common in the Schatzker type 2 (50% of the injuries). Distal femoral fractures were associated with ACL injury in 16%, PCL in 13%, MCL in 26% and LCL in 14%. However, final knee range of motion (ROM) and function (Lysholm score) were not associated with fracture location. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups, except for the valgus stress test at 30°knee flexion, which was more positive in tibial fractures. All eight domains of SF-36 score in the distal femoral and proximal tibial fractures were significantly different from the normal values; however, there were no statistically significant differences between femoral and tibial fracture scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although ROM is acceptable in knee joint fractures, instability is common. However, it seems that knee function and quality of life are not associated with the location of the fracture.